Analysis of the outcomes and factors influencing vaginal trial labor in primiparas at term.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Songwen Nian, Huixia Yang, Yumei Wei
{"title":"Analysis of the outcomes and factors influencing vaginal trial labor in primiparas at term.","authors":"Songwen Nian, Huixia Yang, Yumei Wei","doi":"10.1007/s00404-024-07816-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the outcomes and factors influencing vaginal trial labor in primiparas with term singleton fetuses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 9174 first-time mothers who opted for a vaginal trial of labor at Peking University First Hospital from October 2019 to September 2022 was performed. The primary outcomes included the outcome of the trial of labor and influencing factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the total population, the success rate of attempted vaginal delivery was 74.3% (6818/9174). Logistic regression analysis revealed that increasing maternal age (OR = 1.054; 95% CI = 1.239-2.316; p < 0.001), gestational weight gain (OR = 1.033; 95% CI = 1.022-1.045; p < 0.001), neonatal weight (OR = 1.971; 95% CI = 1.724-2.253; p < 0.001), prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) ≥ 24 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (OR = 1.605; 95% CI = 1.411-1.825; p < 0.001), prenatal BMI ≥ 24 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (OR = 1.326; 95% CI = 1.137-1.546; p < 0.001), and induced labor (OR = 2.434; 95% CI = 2.187-2.708; p < 0.001) increased the risk of failed vaginal delivery attempts, and labor analgesia reduced the risk of failed vaginal delivery attempts (OR = 0.356; 95% CI = 0.320-0.397; p < 0.001). However, the use of assisted reproductive technology had no significant effect on the outcome of attempted vaginal delivery (p = 0.137). According to the partial regression coefficient, the area under the ROC curve was 0.710 (95% CI = 0.698-0.723), and the model passed the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and had good discrimination and calibration (χ<sup>2</sup> = 12.833, p = 0.118). The postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) rate and overall neonatal asphyxia rate differed significantly between women who had different outcomes of vaginal trial labor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are many factors affecting the occurrence of abnormal delivery in primiparas. These independent factors can be used for prenatal evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07816-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the outcomes and factors influencing vaginal trial labor in primiparas with term singleton fetuses.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 9174 first-time mothers who opted for a vaginal trial of labor at Peking University First Hospital from October 2019 to September 2022 was performed. The primary outcomes included the outcome of the trial of labor and influencing factors.

Results: Of the total population, the success rate of attempted vaginal delivery was 74.3% (6818/9174). Logistic regression analysis revealed that increasing maternal age (OR = 1.054; 95% CI = 1.239-2.316; p < 0.001), gestational weight gain (OR = 1.033; 95% CI = 1.022-1.045; p < 0.001), neonatal weight (OR = 1.971; 95% CI = 1.724-2.253; p < 0.001), prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) ≥ 24 kg/m2 (OR = 1.605; 95% CI = 1.411-1.825; p < 0.001), prenatal BMI ≥ 24 kg/m2 (OR = 1.326; 95% CI = 1.137-1.546; p < 0.001), and induced labor (OR = 2.434; 95% CI = 2.187-2.708; p < 0.001) increased the risk of failed vaginal delivery attempts, and labor analgesia reduced the risk of failed vaginal delivery attempts (OR = 0.356; 95% CI = 0.320-0.397; p < 0.001). However, the use of assisted reproductive technology had no significant effect on the outcome of attempted vaginal delivery (p = 0.137). According to the partial regression coefficient, the area under the ROC curve was 0.710 (95% CI = 0.698-0.723), and the model passed the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and had good discrimination and calibration (χ2 = 12.833, p = 0.118). The postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) rate and overall neonatal asphyxia rate differed significantly between women who had different outcomes of vaginal trial labor.

Conclusions: There are many factors affecting the occurrence of abnormal delivery in primiparas. These independent factors can be used for prenatal evaluation.

初产妇足月阴道试产结局及影响因素分析。
目的:探讨影响单胎足月初产妇阴道试产的因素及结局。方法:回顾性分析2019年10月至2022年9月北京大学第一医院9174例选择阴道试产的产妇。主要结局包括产程试验结果及影响因素。结果:阴道分娩成功率为74.3%(6818/9174)。Logistic回归分析显示,产妇年龄增加(OR = 1.054;95% ci = 1.239-2.316;p 2 (OR = 1.605;95% ci = 1.411-1.825;p 2 (OR = 1.326;95% ci = 1.137-1.546;P = 12.833, P = 0.118)。产后出血(PPH)率和新生儿窒息率在阴道试产不同结局的妇女之间有显著差异。结论:影响初产妇异常分娩的因素很多。这些独立因素可用于产前评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
493
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report". The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信