Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Screening With Polymerase Chain Reaction for Early De-escalation of Empiric Vancomycin in the Treatment of Suspected/Confirmed Respiratory Infection in Critically Ill Patients.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Amanda Lin, Evelyn Luo, Eric Gottesman, David LeDoux, Patricia Saunders-Hao, Sumeet Jain, Dimitre G Stefanov, Ryan Butzko, Kelvin Wong, Christian Daniel Barrera Maldonado, Pranisha Gautam-Goyal
{"title":"Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Screening With Polymerase Chain Reaction for Early De-escalation of Empiric Vancomycin in the Treatment of Suspected/Confirmed Respiratory Infection in Critically Ill Patients.","authors":"Amanda Lin, Evelyn Luo, Eric Gottesman, David LeDoux, Patricia Saunders-Hao, Sumeet Jain, Dimitre G Stefanov, Ryan Butzko, Kelvin Wong, Christian Daniel Barrera Maldonado, Pranisha Gautam-Goyal","doi":"10.1097/MJT.0000000000001809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vancomycin empirically for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) pneumonia coverage often is prolonged. With high negative predictive value for MRSA pneumonia, we evaluated the efficacy of MRSA nasal screening with polymerase chain reaction for early de-escalation of empiric vancomycin for treatment of respiratory infections in patients admitted to the intensive care units.</p><p><strong>Study question: </strong>The impact of MRSA nasal screening on early de-escalation of vancomycin for respiratory infections.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective, single-center cohort study was conducted to evaluate the outcomes of vancomycin therapy in patients admitted to the intensive care units with diagnosis of pneumonia before (control group) and after (study group) implementation of MRSA nasal screening.</p><p><strong>Measures and outcomes: </strong>The primary end point was the difference in duration of vancomycin drug therapy in patients with suspected/confirmed pneumonia between the control and study groups. Secondary end points included the number of vancomycin trough levels obtained, discordance between polymerase chain reaction and sputum culture results, and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 123 patients (control: n = 76; study: n = 47) were included. The median vancomycin duration in the control group and the study group was 73.3 hours (54.3-110.6) and 30.2 hours (20.3-39.7), respectively, P < 0.0001. The control group had 2.73 times (95% CI: 2.15-3.45, P < 0.0001) longer vancomycin duration than the study group. There was a significant difference in the number of trough levels obtained between the 2 groups. The median in the control and study groups were 1 (1-3) and 1 (0-1), respectively, P < 0.0001. There was no difference between groups for length of stay, 30-day readmission for MRSA infection, reinitiation of anti-MRSA therapy for infection, vancomycin-resistant enterococci infection within 30 days, acute kidney injury, and in-hospital all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The implementation of a MRSA nasal screening for critically ill patients treated with vancomycin for pneumonia resulted in a significantly shorter duration of vancomycin treatment without negatively affecting patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7760,"journal":{"name":"American journal of therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MJT.0000000000001809","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Vancomycin empirically for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) pneumonia coverage often is prolonged. With high negative predictive value for MRSA pneumonia, we evaluated the efficacy of MRSA nasal screening with polymerase chain reaction for early de-escalation of empiric vancomycin for treatment of respiratory infections in patients admitted to the intensive care units.

Study question: The impact of MRSA nasal screening on early de-escalation of vancomycin for respiratory infections.

Study design: A retrospective, single-center cohort study was conducted to evaluate the outcomes of vancomycin therapy in patients admitted to the intensive care units with diagnosis of pneumonia before (control group) and after (study group) implementation of MRSA nasal screening.

Measures and outcomes: The primary end point was the difference in duration of vancomycin drug therapy in patients with suspected/confirmed pneumonia between the control and study groups. Secondary end points included the number of vancomycin trough levels obtained, discordance between polymerase chain reaction and sputum culture results, and clinical outcomes.

Results: In total, 123 patients (control: n = 76; study: n = 47) were included. The median vancomycin duration in the control group and the study group was 73.3 hours (54.3-110.6) and 30.2 hours (20.3-39.7), respectively, P < 0.0001. The control group had 2.73 times (95% CI: 2.15-3.45, P < 0.0001) longer vancomycin duration than the study group. There was a significant difference in the number of trough levels obtained between the 2 groups. The median in the control and study groups were 1 (1-3) and 1 (0-1), respectively, P < 0.0001. There was no difference between groups for length of stay, 30-day readmission for MRSA infection, reinitiation of anti-MRSA therapy for infection, vancomycin-resistant enterococci infection within 30 days, acute kidney injury, and in-hospital all-cause mortality.

Conclusion: The implementation of a MRSA nasal screening for critically ill patients treated with vancomycin for pneumonia resulted in a significantly shorter duration of vancomycin treatment without negatively affecting patient outcomes.

应用聚合酶链反应进行耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌鼻腔筛查,早期降低经用型万古霉素治疗疑似/确诊呼吸道感染危重患者的剂量
背景:万古霉素经经验治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)肺炎的覆盖面往往延长。由于MRSA肺炎的高阴性预测值,我们评估了MRSA鼻腔聚合酶链反应筛查在重症监护病房收治的患者早期降低经验性万古霉素治疗呼吸道感染的效果。研究问题:MRSA鼻腔筛查对早期万古霉素降低呼吸道感染的影响。研究设计:本研究采用回顾性单中心队列研究,评估重症监护病房确诊为肺炎的患者在实施MRSA鼻腔筛查前(对照组)和后(研究组)使用万古霉素治疗的结果。测量和结果:主要终点是对照组和研究组之间疑似/确诊肺炎患者万古霉素药物治疗持续时间的差异。次要终点包括获得的万古霉素谷底水平的数量,聚合酶链反应和痰培养结果之间的不一致,以及临床结果。结果:共123例患者(对照组76例;研究:n = 47)。对照组和研究组万古霉素的中位持续时间分别为73.3小时(54.3 ~ 110.6)和30.2小时(20.3 ~ 39.7),P < 0.0001。对照组使用万古霉素的时间比研究组长2.73倍(95% CI: 2.15 ~ 3.45, P < 0.0001)。两组间获得的低谷水平数有显著差异。对照组和研究组的中位数分别为1(1-3)和1 (0-1),P < 0.0001。在住院时间、MRSA感染30天再入院、感染后重新开始抗MRSA治疗、30天内万古霉素耐药肠球菌感染、急性肾损伤和院内全因死亡率方面,两组间无差异。结论:对使用万古霉素治疗肺炎的危重患者进行MRSA鼻腔筛查可显著缩短万古霉素治疗时间,且未对患者预后产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of therapeutics
American journal of therapeutics PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
142
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Therapeutics is an indispensable resource for all prescribing physicians who want to access pharmacological developments in cardiology, infectious disease, oncology, anesthesiology, nephrology, toxicology, and psychotropics without having to sift through stacks of medical journals. The journal features original articles on the latest therapeutic approaches as well as critical articles on the drug approval process and therapeutic reviews covering pharmacokinetics, regulatory affairs, pediatric clinical pharmacology, hypertension, metabolism, and drug delivery systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信