Mode of delivery and outcomes among inborn extremely preterm singletons: A cohort study

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Colm P. Travers, Dhuly Chowdhury, Abhik Das, Namasivayam Ambalavanan, Myriam Peralta-Carcelen, Nancy Newman, Shirley Cosby, Myra Wyckoff, Alan Tita, Waldemar A. Carlo, For the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network
{"title":"Mode of delivery and outcomes among inborn extremely preterm singletons: A cohort study","authors":"Colm P. Travers,&nbsp;Dhuly Chowdhury,&nbsp;Abhik Das,&nbsp;Namasivayam Ambalavanan,&nbsp;Myriam Peralta-Carcelen,&nbsp;Nancy Newman,&nbsp;Shirley Cosby,&nbsp;Myra Wyckoff,&nbsp;Alan Tita,&nbsp;Waldemar A. Carlo,&nbsp;For the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network","doi":"10.1111/aogs.15028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Cesarean delivery is the most common mode of delivery among extremely preterm infants but there are insufficient data regarding the best mode of delivery among extremely preterm singletons. The objective of this study was to compare the rate of death or severe neurodevelopmental impairment among extremely preterm singletons by actual mode of delivery.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Observational study using prospectively collected data from 25 US medical centers. We included postnatally-treated singletons with birth weight 401–1000 g, gestational age 22 + 0/7–26 + 6/7 weeks, without a major birth defect, born 2006–2016. Death or severe neurodevelopmental impairment (Bayley Scales of Infant Development-3rd edition cognitive composite score&lt;70, cerebral palsy (Gross Motor Function Classification Scale &gt;3), bilateral blindness, or bilateral hearing loss) at 18–26 month follow-up were compared by mode of delivery (cesarean, vaginal including vertex or breech) using propensity score analysis to adjust for baseline characteristics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There was no difference in death or severe neurodevelopmental impairment between cesarean and vaginal (vertex or breech) births (42.4% cesarean vs. 47.2% vaginal; adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 95% confidence intervals (CI); 1.03, 0.91–1.17). Both cesarean delivery (26.8% cesarean vs. 51.5% breech vaginal; aOR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.55–0.92) and vertex vaginal delivery (28.5% vertex vaginal vs. 51.5% breech vaginal; aOR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.45–0.76) were associated with lower mortality compared with breech vaginal delivery.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Among postnatally-treated extremely preterm singletons, there was no difference in death or severe neurodevelopmental impairment between cesarean or vaginal delivery. Both vertex vaginal and cesarean delivery were associated with lower mortality compared with breech vaginal delivery.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":6990,"journal":{"name":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","volume":"104 2","pages":"408-422"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11782074/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aogs.15028","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Cesarean delivery is the most common mode of delivery among extremely preterm infants but there are insufficient data regarding the best mode of delivery among extremely preterm singletons. The objective of this study was to compare the rate of death or severe neurodevelopmental impairment among extremely preterm singletons by actual mode of delivery.

Material and Methods

Observational study using prospectively collected data from 25 US medical centers. We included postnatally-treated singletons with birth weight 401–1000 g, gestational age 22 + 0/7–26 + 6/7 weeks, without a major birth defect, born 2006–2016. Death or severe neurodevelopmental impairment (Bayley Scales of Infant Development-3rd edition cognitive composite score<70, cerebral palsy (Gross Motor Function Classification Scale >3), bilateral blindness, or bilateral hearing loss) at 18–26 month follow-up were compared by mode of delivery (cesarean, vaginal including vertex or breech) using propensity score analysis to adjust for baseline characteristics.

Results

There was no difference in death or severe neurodevelopmental impairment between cesarean and vaginal (vertex or breech) births (42.4% cesarean vs. 47.2% vaginal; adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 95% confidence intervals (CI); 1.03, 0.91–1.17). Both cesarean delivery (26.8% cesarean vs. 51.5% breech vaginal; aOR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.55–0.92) and vertex vaginal delivery (28.5% vertex vaginal vs. 51.5% breech vaginal; aOR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.45–0.76) were associated with lower mortality compared with breech vaginal delivery.

Conclusions

Among postnatally-treated extremely preterm singletons, there was no difference in death or severe neurodevelopmental impairment between cesarean or vaginal delivery. Both vertex vaginal and cesarean delivery were associated with lower mortality compared with breech vaginal delivery.

Abstract Image

出生极早产单胎的分娩方式和结局:一项队列研究。
剖宫产是极早产儿中最常见的分娩方式,但关于极早产儿单胎的最佳分娩方式的数据不足。本研究的目的是通过实际分娩方式比较极早产单胎的死亡率或严重神经发育障碍。材料和方法:观察性研究使用来自25个美国医疗中心的前瞻性数据。我们纳入出生在2006-2016年,出生体重401- 1000g,胎龄22 + 0/7-26 + 6/7周,无重大出生缺陷的产后单胎。在18-26个月的随访中,通过分娩方式(剖宫产、阴道包括顶点或臀位)比较死亡或严重神经发育障碍(Bayley婴儿发育量表-第三版认知综合评分3)、双侧失明或双侧听力损失。结果:剖宫产与阴道分娩(顶点分娩或臀位分娩)在死亡或严重神经发育障碍方面无差异(剖宫产42.4% vs阴道分娩47.2%;校正优势比(aOR), 95%置信区间(CI);1.03, 0.91 - -1.17)。两种剖宫产(剖宫产26.8% vs阴道产51.5%;优势:0.71;95% CI: 0.55-0.92)和经阴道分娩(经阴道分娩28.5% vs经阴道分娩51.5%;优势:0.59;95% CI: 0.45-0.76)与臀位阴道分娩相比,死亡率较低。结论:在产后治疗的极早产单胎中,剖宫产和阴道分娩在死亡或严重神经发育障碍方面没有差异。阴道顶点分娩和剖宫产与阴道臀位分娩相比死亡率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
180
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Published monthly, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica is an international journal dedicated to providing the very latest information on the results of both clinical, basic and translational research work related to all aspects of women’s health from around the globe. The journal regularly publishes commentaries, reviews, and original articles on a wide variety of topics including: gynecology, pregnancy, birth, female urology, gynecologic oncology, fertility and reproductive biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信