A Prospective Multicenter Analysis of Mobile Stroke Unit Cost-Effectiveness.

IF 8.1 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Annals of Neurology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1002/ana.27105
Suja S Rajan, Jose-Miguel Yamal, Mengxi Wang, Jeffrey L Saver, Asha P Jacob, Nicole R Gonzales, Nneka Ifejika, Stephanie A Parker, Christopher Ganey, Michael O Gonzalez, David R Lairson, Patti L Bratina, William J Jones, Jason S Mackey, Mackenzie P Lerario, Babak B Navi, Ann W Alexandrov, Andrei Alexandrov, May Nour, Ilana Spokoyny, Ritvij Bowry, Alexandra L Czap, James C Grotta
{"title":"A Prospective Multicenter Analysis of Mobile Stroke Unit Cost-Effectiveness.","authors":"Suja S Rajan, Jose-Miguel Yamal, Mengxi Wang, Jeffrey L Saver, Asha P Jacob, Nicole R Gonzales, Nneka Ifejika, Stephanie A Parker, Christopher Ganey, Michael O Gonzalez, David R Lairson, Patti L Bratina, William J Jones, Jason S Mackey, Mackenzie P Lerario, Babak B Navi, Ann W Alexandrov, Andrei Alexandrov, May Nour, Ilana Spokoyny, Ritvij Bowry, Alexandra L Czap, James C Grotta","doi":"10.1002/ana.27105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Given the high disease and cost burden of ischemic stroke, evaluating the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of new approaches to prevent and treat ischemic stroke is critical. Effective ischemic stroke management depends on timely administration of thrombolytics after stroke onset. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness associated with the use of mobile stroke units (MSUs) to expedite tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) administration, as compared with standard management through emergency medical services (EMS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a prospective, multicenter, alternating-week, cluster-controlled trial of MSU versus EMS. One-year and life-time cost-effectiveness analyses, using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) method, were performed from the perspective of CMS's Medicare. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) estimated using patient-reported EQ-5D-5L data were used as the effectiveness measure. Health care utilizations were converted to costs using average national Medicare reimbursements. ICERs excluding patients with pre-existing disability, and limited to stroke-related costs were also calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The first-year ICER for all tPA-eligible patients using total cost differences between MSU and EMS groups was $238,873/QALY; for patients without pre-existing disability was $61,199/QALY. The lifetime ICERs for all tPA-eligible patients and for those without pre-existing disability were $94,710 and $31,259/QALY, respectively. All ICERs were lower when restricted to stroke-related costs and were highly dependent on the number of patients treated per year in an MSU.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>MSUs' cost-effectiveness is borderline if we consider total first-year costs and outcomes in all tPA-eligible patients. MSUs are cost-effective to highly cost-effective when calculations are based on patients without pre-existing disability, patients' lifetime horizon, stroke-related costs, and more patients treated per year in an MSU. ANN NEUROL 2025;97:209-221.</p>","PeriodicalId":127,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"209-221"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.27105","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Given the high disease and cost burden of ischemic stroke, evaluating the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of new approaches to prevent and treat ischemic stroke is critical. Effective ischemic stroke management depends on timely administration of thrombolytics after stroke onset. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness associated with the use of mobile stroke units (MSUs) to expedite tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) administration, as compared with standard management through emergency medical services (EMS).

Methods: This study is a prospective, multicenter, alternating-week, cluster-controlled trial of MSU versus EMS. One-year and life-time cost-effectiveness analyses, using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) method, were performed from the perspective of CMS's Medicare. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) estimated using patient-reported EQ-5D-5L data were used as the effectiveness measure. Health care utilizations were converted to costs using average national Medicare reimbursements. ICERs excluding patients with pre-existing disability, and limited to stroke-related costs were also calculated.

Results: The first-year ICER for all tPA-eligible patients using total cost differences between MSU and EMS groups was $238,873/QALY; for patients without pre-existing disability was $61,199/QALY. The lifetime ICERs for all tPA-eligible patients and for those without pre-existing disability were $94,710 and $31,259/QALY, respectively. All ICERs were lower when restricted to stroke-related costs and were highly dependent on the number of patients treated per year in an MSU.

Interpretation: MSUs' cost-effectiveness is borderline if we consider total first-year costs and outcomes in all tPA-eligible patients. MSUs are cost-effective to highly cost-effective when calculations are based on patients without pre-existing disability, patients' lifetime horizon, stroke-related costs, and more patients treated per year in an MSU. ANN NEUROL 2025;97:209-221.

一项前瞻性多中心分析移动卒中单元成本-效果。
目的:鉴于缺血性脑卒中的高疾病负担和费用负担,评估预防和治疗缺血性脑卒中新方法的临床疗效和成本效益至关重要。有效的缺血性卒中管理取决于卒中发作后及时使用溶栓药物。与通过紧急医疗服务(EMS)进行的标准管理相比,本研究评估了与使用移动卒中单元(msu)加快组织纤溶酶原激活剂(tPA)给药相关的成本效益。方法:本研究是一项前瞻性、多中心、隔周、集群对照的MSU与EMS对照试验。采用增量成本-效果比(ICER)方法,从CMS医疗保险的角度进行1年和终生成本-效果分析。使用患者报告的EQ-5D-5L数据估计的质量调整生命年(QALYs)作为有效性度量。利用全国医疗保险平均报销额将医疗保健利用转换为成本。ICERs排除了已有残疾的患者,并且仅限于中风相关的费用。结果:使用MSU组和EMS组之间的总成本差异,所有符合tpa条件的患者的第一年ICER为238,873美元/QALY;无既往残疾的患者为61,199美元/QALY。所有符合tpa条件的患者和没有预先存在残疾的患者的终生ICERs分别为94,710美元/QALY和31,259美元/QALY。当仅限于卒中相关费用时,所有ICERs都较低,并且高度依赖于每年在MSU治疗的患者数量。解释:如果我们考虑所有符合tpa条件的患者第一年的总成本和结果,MSUs的成本效益是边缘的。当计算基于没有预先存在的残疾的患者、患者的生命周期、卒中相关费用和每年在MSU治疗的患者数量时,MSU具有成本效益到高度成本效益。Ann neurol 2024。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Neurology
Annals of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
18.00
自引率
1.80%
发文量
270
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Neurology publishes original articles with potential for high impact in understanding the pathogenesis, clinical and laboratory features, diagnosis, treatment, outcomes and science underlying diseases of the human nervous system. Articles should ideally be of broad interest to the academic neurological community rather than solely to subspecialists in a particular field. Studies involving experimental model system, including those in cell and organ cultures and animals, of direct translational relevance to the understanding of neurological disease are also encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信