{"title":"Management Strategies for Macadamia Branch Dieback in South Africa","authors":"Fahimeh Jami, Liesl Morey","doi":"10.1111/jph.13443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Macadamia trees are potentially at risk of many diseases especially those caused by latent pathogens. The <i>Botryosphaeriaceae</i> and <i>Diaporthaceae</i> species are among the most important latent pathogens, with widespread distribution across many climate zones and regions. Due to many recent reports of branch dieback in macadamia trees in South Africa this study aimed to: (i) identify the causal fungal species; (ii) examine the aggressiveness of the species obtained; (iii) evaluate the reaction of macadamia cultivars against the most aggressive species; (iv) evaluate the effectiveness of fungicides on disease development and (v) understand pathogens distribution in nurseries as well as common woody plants surrounding macadamia orchards. The samples were collected from trees showing symptoms in 12 orchards and the obtained isolates were identified by DNA sequence data for the rDNA-ITS and TEF1-α loci. Seven <i>Botryosphaeriaceae</i> species (<i>Diplodia eriobotryicola, D. pseudoseriata, Lasiodiplodia theobromae, L. pseudotheobromae, Neofusicoccum parvum, N. kwambonambiense</i> and <i>Pseudofusicoccum olivaceum</i>) and two <i>Diaporthaceae</i> species (<i>Diaporthe ilicicola</i> and <i>Di. macadamiae</i>) were identified. While <i>L. theobromae</i> was the most aggressive species, it produced significantly shorter lesions on the cultivars A4 and Nelmak2 than on Beaumont when their tolerance and susceptibility were evaluated. Out of the 14 commercial tested fungicides in the laboratory, greenhouse and field, five fungicides were confirmed to be effective against <i>L. theobromae</i>. In the survey of pathogen distribution, one species of <i>Diaporthaceae</i> was found to be common between trees in orchards and those in the nursery, while three species of <i>Botryosphaeriaceae</i> were common between trees in orchards and surrounding trees. This study highlights the risks posed by <i>Botryosphaeriaceae</i> and <i>Diaporthaceae</i> species to the macadamia crop. The evaluation of cultivar tolerance and efficacy testing of fungicides provide valuable insights for disease management and mitigation strategies in macadamia orchards, emphasising the need for proactive measures in preserving tree health and productivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":16843,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Phytopathology","volume":"172 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jph.13443","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Phytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jph.13443","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Macadamia trees are potentially at risk of many diseases especially those caused by latent pathogens. The Botryosphaeriaceae and Diaporthaceae species are among the most important latent pathogens, with widespread distribution across many climate zones and regions. Due to many recent reports of branch dieback in macadamia trees in South Africa this study aimed to: (i) identify the causal fungal species; (ii) examine the aggressiveness of the species obtained; (iii) evaluate the reaction of macadamia cultivars against the most aggressive species; (iv) evaluate the effectiveness of fungicides on disease development and (v) understand pathogens distribution in nurseries as well as common woody plants surrounding macadamia orchards. The samples were collected from trees showing symptoms in 12 orchards and the obtained isolates were identified by DNA sequence data for the rDNA-ITS and TEF1-α loci. Seven Botryosphaeriaceae species (Diplodia eriobotryicola, D. pseudoseriata, Lasiodiplodia theobromae, L. pseudotheobromae, Neofusicoccum parvum, N. kwambonambiense and Pseudofusicoccum olivaceum) and two Diaporthaceae species (Diaporthe ilicicola and Di. macadamiae) were identified. While L. theobromae was the most aggressive species, it produced significantly shorter lesions on the cultivars A4 and Nelmak2 than on Beaumont when their tolerance and susceptibility were evaluated. Out of the 14 commercial tested fungicides in the laboratory, greenhouse and field, five fungicides were confirmed to be effective against L. theobromae. In the survey of pathogen distribution, one species of Diaporthaceae was found to be common between trees in orchards and those in the nursery, while three species of Botryosphaeriaceae were common between trees in orchards and surrounding trees. This study highlights the risks posed by Botryosphaeriaceae and Diaporthaceae species to the macadamia crop. The evaluation of cultivar tolerance and efficacy testing of fungicides provide valuable insights for disease management and mitigation strategies in macadamia orchards, emphasising the need for proactive measures in preserving tree health and productivity.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Phytopathology publishes original and review articles on all scientific aspects of applied phytopathology in agricultural and horticultural crops. Preference is given to contributions improving our understanding of the biotic and abiotic determinants of plant diseases, including epidemics and damage potential, as a basis for innovative disease management, modelling and forecasting. This includes practical aspects and the development of methods for disease diagnosis as well as infection bioassays.
Studies at the population, organism, physiological, biochemical and molecular genetic level are welcome. The journal scope comprises the pathology and epidemiology of plant diseases caused by microbial pathogens, viruses and nematodes.
Accepted papers should advance our conceptual knowledge of plant diseases, rather than presenting descriptive or screening data unrelated to phytopathological mechanisms or functions. Results from unrepeated experimental conditions or data with no or inappropriate statistical processing will not be considered. Authors are encouraged to look at past issues to ensure adherence to the standards of the journal.