Germanic Rampart or Roman Encampment?—New Geoarchaeological Evidence at the Roman Conflict Site at Kalkriese (NW-Germany)

IF 1.4 3区 地球科学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Joachim W. Härtling, Andreas Stele, Salvatore Ortisi, Andre Jepsen, Marc Rappe, Jens Bussmann, Alexander Fülling
{"title":"Germanic Rampart or Roman Encampment?—New Geoarchaeological Evidence at the Roman Conflict Site at Kalkriese (NW-Germany)","authors":"Joachim W. Härtling,&nbsp;Andreas Stele,&nbsp;Salvatore Ortisi,&nbsp;Andre Jepsen,&nbsp;Marc Rappe,&nbsp;Jens Bussmann,&nbsp;Alexander Fülling","doi":"10.1002/gea.22031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Kalkriese, near Osnabrueck (NW Germany), is considered the location of the ‘Battle of Varus’, where a coalition of Germanic tribes, under the leadership of Arminius, defeated three Legions under the command of Varus in 9 <span>ad</span>. Roman coinage and remains of military equipment prove that the Oberesch site at Kalkriese saw military operations between Germanic tribes and the Roman legions during Early Imperial times, but the sequence and magnitude of the military operations still remain unclear. In this study, we present for the first time absolute dates from the Oberesch site to decipher the general sequence of the Holocene landscape development at Kalkriese, identify the antique surface, and evaluate the ‘Germanic Rampart Theory’ and the ‘Roman Encampment Theory’. The geoprofile encompasses the entire stratigraphic sequence from the Pleistocene base, indicating intensive agricultural use of the area since the Early Neolithic. A fossil topsoil of late Pre-Roman Iron Age to Roman Imperial Age was identified, which probably represents the antique surface of the Roman conflict site. Our results do not support either the ‘Germanic Rampart Theory’ or the ‘Roman Encampment Theory’, as both linear structures seem to be of High Middle Age origin.</p>","PeriodicalId":55117,"journal":{"name":"Geoarchaeology-An International Journal","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gea.22031","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoarchaeology-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gea.22031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Kalkriese, near Osnabrueck (NW Germany), is considered the location of the ‘Battle of Varus’, where a coalition of Germanic tribes, under the leadership of Arminius, defeated three Legions under the command of Varus in 9 ad. Roman coinage and remains of military equipment prove that the Oberesch site at Kalkriese saw military operations between Germanic tribes and the Roman legions during Early Imperial times, but the sequence and magnitude of the military operations still remain unclear. In this study, we present for the first time absolute dates from the Oberesch site to decipher the general sequence of the Holocene landscape development at Kalkriese, identify the antique surface, and evaluate the ‘Germanic Rampart Theory’ and the ‘Roman Encampment Theory’. The geoprofile encompasses the entire stratigraphic sequence from the Pleistocene base, indicating intensive agricultural use of the area since the Early Neolithic. A fossil topsoil of late Pre-Roman Iron Age to Roman Imperial Age was identified, which probably represents the antique surface of the Roman conflict site. Our results do not support either the ‘Germanic Rampart Theory’ or the ‘Roman Encampment Theory’, as both linear structures seem to be of High Middle Age origin.

Abstract Image

日耳曼堡垒还是罗马营地?-卡尔克里塞(德国西北部)罗马冲突遗址的新地质考古证据
附近Kalkriese Osnabrueck (NW德国),被认为是“弓形腿的战斗”的位置,一个日耳曼部落联盟,阿米尼乌斯的领导下,打败了三个军团的指挥下弓形腿公元9。罗马钱币和军事装备的遗迹证明,在帝国早期,卡尔克里塞的奥伯雷施遗址见证了日耳曼部落和罗马军团之间的军事行动,但军事行动的顺序和规模仍不清楚。在这项研究中,我们首次提出了Oberesch遗址的绝对日期,以破译Kalkriese全新世景观发展的一般顺序,识别古董表面,并评估“日耳曼壁垒理论”和“罗马营地理论”。地质剖面包括从更新世基地开始的整个地层序列,表明该地区自新石器时代早期以来就有密集的农业利用。发现了前罗马铁器时代晚期至罗马帝国时代的表土化石,可能代表了罗马冲突遗址的古代表面。我们的研究结果既不支持“日耳曼堡垒理论”,也不支持“罗马营地理论”,因为这两种线性结构似乎都起源于中世纪鼎盛时期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoarchaeology-An International Journal
Geoarchaeology-An International Journal 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Geoarchaeology is an interdisciplinary journal published six times per year (in January, March, May, July, September and November). It presents the results of original research at the methodological and theoretical interface between archaeology and the geosciences and includes within its scope: interdisciplinary work focusing on understanding archaeological sites, their environmental context, and particularly site formation processes and how the analysis of sedimentary records can enhance our understanding of human activity in Quaternary environments. Manuscripts should examine the interrelationship between archaeology and the various disciplines within Quaternary science and the Earth Sciences more generally, including, for example: geology, geography, geomorphology, pedology, climatology, oceanography, geochemistry, geochronology, and geophysics. We also welcome papers that deal with the biological record of past human activity through the analysis of faunal and botanical remains and palaeoecological reconstructions that shed light on past human-environment interactions. The journal also welcomes manuscripts concerning the examination and geological context of human fossil remains as well as papers that employ analytical techniques to advance understanding of the composition and origin or material culture such as, for example, ceramics, metals, lithics, building stones, plasters, and cements. Such composition and provenance studies should be strongly grounded in their geological context through, for example, the systematic analysis of potential source materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信