The relationships among illness perceptions, dyadic coping and illness management in breast cancer patients and their spouses: A dyadic longitudinal mediation model

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Mingfang Li, Lijuan Zhang, Liping Zhang, Xinyi Li, Yantong Xie, Yuqi Qiu, Meng Zhao, Jing Chen, Jun Yan
{"title":"The relationships among illness perceptions, dyadic coping and illness management in breast cancer patients and their spouses: A dyadic longitudinal mediation model","authors":"Mingfang Li,&nbsp;Lijuan Zhang,&nbsp;Liping Zhang,&nbsp;Xinyi Li,&nbsp;Yantong Xie,&nbsp;Yuqi Qiu,&nbsp;Meng Zhao,&nbsp;Jing Chen,&nbsp;Jun Yan","doi":"10.1111/bjhp.12771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To describe and compare dyads' illness perceptions, dyadic coping and illness management among breast cancer patients and their spouses. In addition, we explore the direct actor and partner effects of illness perception on illness management, and whether this association is mediated by dyadic coping.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>A descriptive and longitudinal study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Baseline illness perceptions and dyadic coping during hospitalization were measured by using the Illness Perception Questionnaire–revised (IPQ-R) and the Dyadic Coping Inventory (DCI). At the 3rd month after discharge, the Cancer Self-Management Assessment Scale (CSMAS) and the Caregiver's Contribution to the Cancer Patient's Self-Management Scale (CC-CPSMS) were used to test the dyads' illness management. Then, the actor–partner interdependence mediation model (APIMeM) was constructed to explore intrapersonal and interpersonal effects.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 225 postsurgical breast cancer patients and their spouses completed the questionnaires. It revealed that patients' or spouses' illness perceptions had both positive and negative direct actor effects on their own illness management (positive: personal control and illness coherence dimension; and negative: timeline acute/chronic, consequence, emotional representation and causes-uncontrollable factors dimension). The significant direct partner effects were only displayed in the timeline acute/chronic dimension. Moreover, dyadic coping had mediating effects on these paths, and only the actor–actor and partner–actor indirect effects were statistically significant.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study demonstrates the significance of illness perceptions in influencing dyads' illness management and reveals the underlying mediating mechanism of dyadic coping. It can provide more specific guidance for dyadic interventions to optimize dyads' behaviour among breast cancer patients and their spouses.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48161,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Health Psychology","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjhp.12771","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To describe and compare dyads' illness perceptions, dyadic coping and illness management among breast cancer patients and their spouses. In addition, we explore the direct actor and partner effects of illness perception on illness management, and whether this association is mediated by dyadic coping.

Design

A descriptive and longitudinal study.

Methods

Baseline illness perceptions and dyadic coping during hospitalization were measured by using the Illness Perception Questionnaire–revised (IPQ-R) and the Dyadic Coping Inventory (DCI). At the 3rd month after discharge, the Cancer Self-Management Assessment Scale (CSMAS) and the Caregiver's Contribution to the Cancer Patient's Self-Management Scale (CC-CPSMS) were used to test the dyads' illness management. Then, the actor–partner interdependence mediation model (APIMeM) was constructed to explore intrapersonal and interpersonal effects.

Results

A total of 225 postsurgical breast cancer patients and their spouses completed the questionnaires. It revealed that patients' or spouses' illness perceptions had both positive and negative direct actor effects on their own illness management (positive: personal control and illness coherence dimension; and negative: timeline acute/chronic, consequence, emotional representation and causes-uncontrollable factors dimension). The significant direct partner effects were only displayed in the timeline acute/chronic dimension. Moreover, dyadic coping had mediating effects on these paths, and only the actor–actor and partner–actor indirect effects were statistically significant.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates the significance of illness perceptions in influencing dyads' illness management and reveals the underlying mediating mechanism of dyadic coping. It can provide more specific guidance for dyadic interventions to optimize dyads' behaviour among breast cancer patients and their spouses.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Health Psychology
British Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
1.30%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The focus of the British Journal of Health Psychology is to publish original research on various aspects of psychology that are related to health, health-related behavior, and illness throughout a person's life. The journal specifically seeks articles that are based on health psychology theory or discuss theoretical matters within the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信