E-52862—A selective sigma-1 receptor antagonist, in peripheral neuropathic pain: Two randomized, double-blind, phase 2 studies in patients with chronic postsurgical pain and painful diabetic neuropathy

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Rafael Gálvez, Victor Mayoral, Jesús Cebrecos, Francisco J. Medel, Adelaida Morte, Mariano Sust, Anna Vaqué, Antonio Montes-Pérez, Fernando Neira-Reina, Luz Cánovas, César Margarit, Didier Bouhassira
{"title":"E-52862—A selective sigma-1 receptor antagonist, in peripheral neuropathic pain: Two randomized, double-blind, phase 2 studies in patients with chronic postsurgical pain and painful diabetic neuropathy","authors":"Rafael Gálvez,&nbsp;Victor Mayoral,&nbsp;Jesús Cebrecos,&nbsp;Francisco J. Medel,&nbsp;Adelaida Morte,&nbsp;Mariano Sust,&nbsp;Anna Vaqué,&nbsp;Antonio Montes-Pérez,&nbsp;Fernando Neira-Reina,&nbsp;Luz Cánovas,&nbsp;César Margarit,&nbsp;Didier Bouhassira","doi":"10.1002/ejp.4755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>We report the efficacy and safety of E-52862—a selective, sigma-1 receptor antagonist—from phase 2, randomized, proof-of-concept studies in patients with moderate-to-severe, neuropathic, chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) and painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Adult patients (CPSP [<i>N</i> = 116]; PDN [<i>N</i> = 163]) were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to 4 weeks of treatment with E-52862 (CPSP [<i>n</i> = 55]; PDN [<i>n</i> = 85]) or placebo (CPSP [<i>n</i> = 61]; PDN [<i>n</i> = 78]) orally once daily. Pain intensity scores were measured using a numerical pain rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). The primary analysis population comprised patients who received study drug with ≥1 baseline and on-treatment observation (full analysis set).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In CPSP, mean baseline average pain was 6.2 for E-52862 vs. 6.5 for placebo. Week 4 mean change from baseline (CFB) for average pain was −1.6 for E-52862 vs. –0.9 for placebo (least squares mean difference [LSMD]: −0.9; <i>p</i> = 0.029). In PDN, mean baseline average pain was 5.3 for E-52862 vs. 5.4 for placebo. Week 4 mean CFB for average pain was −2.2 for E-52862 vs. –2.1 for placebo (LSMD: –0.1; <i>p</i> = 0.766). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 90.9% of E-52862-treated patients vs. 76.7% of placebo-treated patients in CPSP and 34.1% vs. 26.9% in PDN. Serious TEAEs occurred in CPSP only: E-52862: 5.5%; placebo: 6.7%.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>E-52862 demonstrated superior relief of CPSP vs. placebo after 4 weeks. Reductions in pain intensity were seen in PDN with E-52862; high placebo response rates may have prevented differentiation between treatments. E-52862 had acceptable tolerability in both populations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Significance Statement</h3>\n \n <p>These proof-of-concept studies validate the mode of action of E-52862, a selective sigma-1 receptor antagonist. In CPSP, E-52862 resulted in clinically meaningful pain relief. In PDN, reductions in pain intensity were seen with E-52862; high placebo response rates may have prevented differentiation between E-52862 and placebo. These findings are clinically relevant given that neuropathic pain is highly incapacitating, lacking effective treatments and representing a significant unmet medical need, and support further development of sigma-1 receptor antagonists for peripheral neuropathic pain.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12021,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pain","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejp.4755","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejp.4755","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

We report the efficacy and safety of E-52862—a selective, sigma-1 receptor antagonist—from phase 2, randomized, proof-of-concept studies in patients with moderate-to-severe, neuropathic, chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) and painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN).

Methods

Adult patients (CPSP [N = 116]; PDN [N = 163]) were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to 4 weeks of treatment with E-52862 (CPSP [n = 55]; PDN [n = 85]) or placebo (CPSP [n = 61]; PDN [n = 78]) orally once daily. Pain intensity scores were measured using a numerical pain rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). The primary analysis population comprised patients who received study drug with ≥1 baseline and on-treatment observation (full analysis set).

Results

In CPSP, mean baseline average pain was 6.2 for E-52862 vs. 6.5 for placebo. Week 4 mean change from baseline (CFB) for average pain was −1.6 for E-52862 vs. –0.9 for placebo (least squares mean difference [LSMD]: −0.9; p = 0.029). In PDN, mean baseline average pain was 5.3 for E-52862 vs. 5.4 for placebo. Week 4 mean CFB for average pain was −2.2 for E-52862 vs. –2.1 for placebo (LSMD: –0.1; p = 0.766). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 90.9% of E-52862-treated patients vs. 76.7% of placebo-treated patients in CPSP and 34.1% vs. 26.9% in PDN. Serious TEAEs occurred in CPSP only: E-52862: 5.5%; placebo: 6.7%.

Conclusions

E-52862 demonstrated superior relief of CPSP vs. placebo after 4 weeks. Reductions in pain intensity were seen in PDN with E-52862; high placebo response rates may have prevented differentiation between treatments. E-52862 had acceptable tolerability in both populations.

Significance Statement

These proof-of-concept studies validate the mode of action of E-52862, a selective sigma-1 receptor antagonist. In CPSP, E-52862 resulted in clinically meaningful pain relief. In PDN, reductions in pain intensity were seen with E-52862; high placebo response rates may have prevented differentiation between E-52862 and placebo. These findings are clinically relevant given that neuropathic pain is highly incapacitating, lacking effective treatments and representing a significant unmet medical need, and support further development of sigma-1 receptor antagonists for peripheral neuropathic pain.

Abstract Image

E-52862-A选择性sigma-1受体拮抗剂治疗周围神经性疼痛:两项随机、双盲、2期研究,研究对象是慢性术后疼痛和疼痛性糖尿病神经病变患者
我们报告了选择性sigma-1受体拮抗剂e- 52862在中度至重度神经性慢性术后疼痛(CPSP)和疼痛性糖尿病神经病变(PDN)患者中的有效性和安全性,这是一项随机的二期概念验证研究。方法成人CPSP患者[N = 116];PDN [N = 163])按1:1的比例随机分配至E-52862 (CPSP [N = 55];PDN [n = 85])或安慰剂(CPSP [n = 61];PDN [n = 78])每日口服1次。疼痛强度评分采用从0(无疼痛)到10(可想象的最严重疼痛)的数值疼痛等级量表进行测量。主要分析人群包括接受研究药物且基线和治疗中观察≥1次的患者(完整分析集)。结果:在CPSP中,E-52862组的平均基线疼痛为6.2,安慰剂组为6.5。第4周,E-52862组的平均疼痛基线平均变化(CFB)为- 1.6,安慰剂组为-0.9(最小二乘平均差[LSMD]: -0.9;p = 0.029)。在PDN中,E-52862组的平均基线疼痛为5.3,而安慰剂组为5.4。第4周,E-52862组平均疼痛的平均CFB为- 2.2,安慰剂组为-2.1 (LSMD: -0.1;p = 0.766)。在接受e -52862治疗的患者中,90.9%的患者报告了治疗后出现的不良事件(teae),而在接受安慰剂治疗的患者中,这一比例为76.7%,在接受PDN治疗的患者中,这一比例为34.1%,而在接受PDN治疗的患者中,这一比例为26.9%。严重teae仅发生在CPSP中:E-52862: 5.5%;安慰剂:6.7%。结论E-52862在4周后对CPSP的缓解优于安慰剂。服用E-52862的PDN患者疼痛强度降低;高安慰剂反应率可能阻碍了治疗之间的区分。E-52862在两个人群中都有可接受的耐受性。这些概念验证研究验证了选择性sigma-1受体拮抗剂E-52862的作用模式。在CPSP中,E-52862导致临床意义上的疼痛缓解。在PDN中,E-52862可以减轻疼痛强度;高安慰剂反应率可能阻止了E-52862和安慰剂之间的区分。这些发现具有临床意义,因为神经性疼痛是高度失能的,缺乏有效的治疗方法,代表着显著的未满足的医疗需求,并支持进一步开发sigma-1受体拮抗剂治疗周围神经性疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Pain
European Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Pain (EJP) publishes clinical and basic science research papers relevant to all aspects of pain and its management, including specialties such as anaesthesia, dentistry, neurology and neurosurgery, orthopaedics, palliative care, pharmacology, physiology, psychiatry, psychology and rehabilitation; socio-economic aspects of pain are also covered. Regular sections in the journal are as follows: • Editorials and Commentaries • Position Papers and Guidelines • Reviews • Original Articles • Letters • Bookshelf The journal particularly welcomes clinical trials, which are published on an occasional basis. Research articles are published under the following subject headings: • Neurobiology • Neurology • Experimental Pharmacology • Clinical Pharmacology • Psychology • Behavioural Therapy • Epidemiology • Cancer Pain • Acute Pain • Clinical Trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信