A new mathematical solution of convection-dispersion equation to describe solute transport in heterogeneous soils

Xiufu Shuai
{"title":"A new mathematical solution of convection-dispersion equation to describe solute transport in heterogeneous soils","authors":"Xiufu Shuai","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There was a long-time debate about the validation of the convection-dispersion equation (CDE) and its replacement with the well-known convective lognormal transfer function model (CLT) to describe solute transport in a heterogeneous soil with uniformity at the longitudinal water flow direction and nonuniformity at the transverse direction. The objective of this study is to prove that the CDE is valid and almost identical to the CLT. Gamma probability density function (pdf) was initially assumed in this study to describe the distribution of pore-water velocity across capillary tubes in a heterogeneous soil. The capillary bundle model was used to describe solute transport without transverse solute mixing between adjacent tubes. The inverse-gamma function, a new mathematical solution of the CDE differential equation with scale-dependent dispersivity, was initially derived from the capillary bundle model and the gamma pdf. The only difference between the inverse-gamma function and the CLT is that lognormal pdf of pore-water velocity is assumed in the CLT while the two pdfs are close to each other. The inverse-gamma function and the CLT were tested with the published data from the miscible displacement experiments on the two repacked soils with different aggregate sizes. Results show that both the inverse-gamma function and the CLT fit the measured breakthrough curves in the miscible displacement experiments. The estimates of the squared coefficient of variation of the pore-water velocity in the gamma pdf were 0.314 and 0.0582 for the two soils, and they were consistent with the lognormal pdf in the CLT.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.20794","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There was a long-time debate about the validation of the convection-dispersion equation (CDE) and its replacement with the well-known convective lognormal transfer function model (CLT) to describe solute transport in a heterogeneous soil with uniformity at the longitudinal water flow direction and nonuniformity at the transverse direction. The objective of this study is to prove that the CDE is valid and almost identical to the CLT. Gamma probability density function (pdf) was initially assumed in this study to describe the distribution of pore-water velocity across capillary tubes in a heterogeneous soil. The capillary bundle model was used to describe solute transport without transverse solute mixing between adjacent tubes. The inverse-gamma function, a new mathematical solution of the CDE differential equation with scale-dependent dispersivity, was initially derived from the capillary bundle model and the gamma pdf. The only difference between the inverse-gamma function and the CLT is that lognormal pdf of pore-water velocity is assumed in the CLT while the two pdfs are close to each other. The inverse-gamma function and the CLT were tested with the published data from the miscible displacement experiments on the two repacked soils with different aggregate sizes. Results show that both the inverse-gamma function and the CLT fit the measured breakthrough curves in the miscible displacement experiments. The estimates of the squared coefficient of variation of the pore-water velocity in the gamma pdf were 0.314 and 0.0582 for the two soils, and they were consistent with the lognormal pdf in the CLT.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信