Increasing variability in resource supply over time disrupts plant–pollinator interactions

IF 7.1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Deanne Redr, Alyssa R. Cirtwill, Riikka Kaartinen, Anna Grunsky, Ian Hogg, Donald McLennan, Claus Rasmussen, Niels Martin Schmidt, Mikko Tiusanen, Johann Wagner, Helena Wirta, Tomas Roslin
{"title":"Increasing variability in resource supply over time disrupts plant–pollinator interactions","authors":"Deanne Redr, Alyssa R. Cirtwill, Riikka Kaartinen, Anna Grunsky, Ian Hogg, Donald McLennan, Claus Rasmussen, Niels Martin Schmidt, Mikko Tiusanen, Johann Wagner, Helena Wirta, Tomas Roslin","doi":"10.1002/ecm.1637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Insect–plant interactions are key determinants of plant and insect fitness, providing important ecosystem services around the world—including the Arctic region. Recently, it has been suggested that climate warming causes rifts between flower and pollinator phenology. To what extent the progression of pollinators matches the availability of flowers in the Arctic season is poorly known. In this study, we aimed to characterize the community phenology of flowers and insects in a rapidly changing Arctic environment from a descriptive and functional perspective. To this end, we inferred changes in resource availability from both a plant and an insect point of view, by connecting resource and consumer species through a metaweb of all the plant–insect interactions ever observed at a site. Specifically, we: (1) characterized species-specific phenology among plants and insects at two High-Arctic sites—Cambridge Bay in Nunavut, Canada, and Zackenberg in Northeast Greenland; (2) quantified competition for flowers using sticky flower mimics; (3) used information on plant–pollinator interactions to quantify supply and demand for pollinator services versus flower resources during the summer; and (4) compared patterns observed within a focal summer at each site to patterns of long-term change at Zackenberg, using a 25-year time series of plant flowering and insect phenology. Within summers, we found evidence of a general mismatch between supply and demand. Over the 25-year time series, the number of weeks per summer when resource supply fell below a standardized threshold increased significantly over time. In addition, variation in resource availability increased significantly over years. We suggest that the number of resource-poor weeks per year is increasing and becoming less predictable in the High Arctic. This will have important implications for plant pollination, pollinator fitness, and the future of the Arctic ecosystem, as both plants and their pollinators are faced with widening resource gaps.","PeriodicalId":11505,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Monographs","volume":"207 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1637","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Insect–plant interactions are key determinants of plant and insect fitness, providing important ecosystem services around the world—including the Arctic region. Recently, it has been suggested that climate warming causes rifts between flower and pollinator phenology. To what extent the progression of pollinators matches the availability of flowers in the Arctic season is poorly known. In this study, we aimed to characterize the community phenology of flowers and insects in a rapidly changing Arctic environment from a descriptive and functional perspective. To this end, we inferred changes in resource availability from both a plant and an insect point of view, by connecting resource and consumer species through a metaweb of all the plant–insect interactions ever observed at a site. Specifically, we: (1) characterized species-specific phenology among plants and insects at two High-Arctic sites—Cambridge Bay in Nunavut, Canada, and Zackenberg in Northeast Greenland; (2) quantified competition for flowers using sticky flower mimics; (3) used information on plant–pollinator interactions to quantify supply and demand for pollinator services versus flower resources during the summer; and (4) compared patterns observed within a focal summer at each site to patterns of long-term change at Zackenberg, using a 25-year time series of plant flowering and insect phenology. Within summers, we found evidence of a general mismatch between supply and demand. Over the 25-year time series, the number of weeks per summer when resource supply fell below a standardized threshold increased significantly over time. In addition, variation in resource availability increased significantly over years. We suggest that the number of resource-poor weeks per year is increasing and becoming less predictable in the High Arctic. This will have important implications for plant pollination, pollinator fitness, and the future of the Arctic ecosystem, as both plants and their pollinators are faced with widening resource gaps.
随着时间的推移,资源供应的变异性不断增加,破坏了植物与传粉者的相互作用
昆虫与植物的相互作用是植物和昆虫适合度的关键决定因素,在世界各地(包括北极地区)提供重要的生态系统服务。最近,有人提出,气候变暖导致了花和传粉者物候之间的裂痕。在多大程度上,传粉媒介的进展与北极季节的花卉供应相匹配,目前尚不清楚。在这项研究中,我们旨在从描述和功能的角度来描述快速变化的北极环境中花和昆虫的群落物候特征。为此,我们从植物和昆虫的角度推断资源可用性的变化,通过在一个地点观察到的所有植物-昆虫相互作用的元网络将资源和消费物种联系起来。具体而言,我们:(1)在加拿大努纳武特(Nunavut)的剑桥湾(cambridge Bay)和格陵兰岛东北部的扎肯伯格(Zackenberg)这两个高北极地点对植物和昆虫的物种特异性物候进行了研究;(2)利用粘花模拟物对花卉进行量化竞争;(3)利用植物-传粉媒介相互作用信息,量化夏季传粉媒介服务与花卉资源的供需关系;(4)利用25年植物开花和昆虫物候的时间序列,将每个站点在焦点夏季观测到的模式与Zackenberg的长期变化模式进行了比较。在夏季,我们发现了供应和需求之间普遍不匹配的证据。在25年的时间序列中,每年夏季资源供应低于标准化阈值的周数随着时间的推移而显著增加。此外,多年来资源可用性的变化显著增加。我们认为,在高北极地区,每年资源贫乏周的数量正在增加,并且变得越来越难以预测。这将对植物授粉、传粉者适应性和北极生态系统的未来产生重要影响,因为植物及其传粉者都面临着不断扩大的资源缺口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Monographs
Ecological Monographs 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The vision for Ecological Monographs is that it should be the place for publishing integrative, synthetic papers that elaborate new directions for the field of ecology. Original Research Papers published in Ecological Monographs will continue to document complex observational, experimental, or theoretical studies that by their very integrated nature defy dissolution into shorter publications focused on a single topic or message. Reviews will be comprehensive and synthetic papers that establish new benchmarks in the field, define directions for future research, contribute to fundamental understanding of ecological principles, and derive principles for ecological management in its broadest sense (including, but not limited to: conservation, mitigation, restoration, and pro-active protection of the environment). Reviews should reflect the full development of a topic and encompass relevant natural history, observational and experimental data, analyses, models, and theory. Reviews published in Ecological Monographs should further blur the boundaries between “basic” and “applied” ecology. Concepts and Synthesis papers will conceptually advance the field of ecology. These papers are expected to go well beyond works being reviewed and include discussion of new directions, new syntheses, and resolutions of old questions. In this world of rapid scientific advancement and never-ending environmental change, there needs to be room for the thoughtful integration of scientific ideas, data, and concepts that feeds the mind and guides the development of the maturing science of ecology. Ecological Monographs provides that room, with an expansive view to a sustainable future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信