Shear versus flexural bond tests of Textile-Reinforced Mortar applied to masonry substrates

IF 3.4 3区 工程技术 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Paraskevi D. Askouni, Catherine G. Papanicolaou
{"title":"Shear versus flexural bond tests of Textile-Reinforced Mortar applied to masonry substrates","authors":"Paraskevi D. Askouni,&nbsp;Catherine G. Papanicolaou","doi":"10.1617/s11527-024-02529-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The existing recommendations for the experimental investigation of the bond characteristics along interfaces comprising Textile-Reinforced Mortar (TRM) overlays and various types of substrates ignore the effect of out-of-plane stresses. This study investigates the in-plane and out-of-plane bond of two TRM systems with masonry substrate, employing the Single-Lap/Single-Prism (SL/SP) and the Modified Hinged Beam (MHB) set-up, respectively. The two systems shared the same cementitious matrix and comprised either Alkali Resistant (AR)-glass or carbon dry fibers textile (named GTRM and CTRM, respectively), while they had comparable axial rigidity. The failure mode of the specimens was due to slippage of the textile form within the matrix, regardless of the examined TRM system as well as the used set-up. Based on the comparison of the maximum textile axial stress obtained from the SL/SP and MHB tests for each TRM system, it was found that the normal stresses developed during bending enhanced the bond capacity of the CTRM system by almost 30%, whereas they had no apparent effect on the bond capacity of the GTRM system. The results of the current and previous related studies suggest that the bending stiffness, <i>E</i><sub><i>fib</i></sub><i>I</i><sub><i>fib</i></sub>, of fibers is a parameter that could be correlated with the effect of the normal stress, in case dry fiber textiles are considered. Finally, it is concluded that for both adopted TRM systems the Cohesive Material Law calibrated based on the response curves obtained from the SL/SP and MHB tests is affected by the type of both the bond test and the textile’s fibers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":691,"journal":{"name":"Materials and Structures","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1617/s11527-024-02529-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The existing recommendations for the experimental investigation of the bond characteristics along interfaces comprising Textile-Reinforced Mortar (TRM) overlays and various types of substrates ignore the effect of out-of-plane stresses. This study investigates the in-plane and out-of-plane bond of two TRM systems with masonry substrate, employing the Single-Lap/Single-Prism (SL/SP) and the Modified Hinged Beam (MHB) set-up, respectively. The two systems shared the same cementitious matrix and comprised either Alkali Resistant (AR)-glass or carbon dry fibers textile (named GTRM and CTRM, respectively), while they had comparable axial rigidity. The failure mode of the specimens was due to slippage of the textile form within the matrix, regardless of the examined TRM system as well as the used set-up. Based on the comparison of the maximum textile axial stress obtained from the SL/SP and MHB tests for each TRM system, it was found that the normal stresses developed during bending enhanced the bond capacity of the CTRM system by almost 30%, whereas they had no apparent effect on the bond capacity of the GTRM system. The results of the current and previous related studies suggest that the bending stiffness, EfibIfib, of fibers is a parameter that could be correlated with the effect of the normal stress, in case dry fiber textiles are considered. Finally, it is concluded that for both adopted TRM systems the Cohesive Material Law calibrated based on the response curves obtained from the SL/SP and MHB tests is affected by the type of both the bond test and the textile’s fibers.

Abstract Image

用于砌筑基材的纺织增强砂浆的剪切与弯曲粘结试验
现有的关于纺织品增强砂浆(TRM)覆盖层与各种类型基材界面粘结特性的实验研究建议忽略了面外应力的影响。本研究分别采用单搭接/单棱镜(SL/SP)和改进铰接梁(MHB)设置,研究了两种带有砌体基板的TRM系统的面内和面外键合。这两种体系具有相同的胶凝基质,由抗碱(AR)玻璃或碳干纤维纺织品(分别命名为GTRM和CTRM)组成,同时它们具有相当的轴向刚度。试样的失效模式是由于织物形式在基体内的滑移,无论检查TRM系统以及使用的设置。通过对比各TRM体系在SL/SP和MHB试验中获得的最大纺织轴向应力,发现弯曲过程中产生的正应力使CTRM体系的粘结能力提高了近30%,而对GTRM体系的粘结能力没有明显影响。目前和以往的相关研究结果表明,对于干纤维纺织品,纤维的弯曲刚度EfibIfib是一个可以与正应力影响相关的参数。最后得出结论,对于两种采用TRM的体系,基于SL/SP和MHB测试获得的响应曲线校准的内聚材料定律受到粘合测试和纺织品纤维类型的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Materials and Structures
Materials and Structures 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
222
审稿时长
5.9 months
期刊介绍: Materials and Structures, the flagship publication of the International Union of Laboratories and Experts in Construction Materials, Systems and Structures (RILEM), provides a unique international and interdisciplinary forum for new research findings on the performance of construction materials. A leader in cutting-edge research, the journal is dedicated to the publication of high quality papers examining the fundamental properties of building materials, their characterization and processing techniques, modeling, standardization of test methods, and the application of research results in building and civil engineering. Materials and Structures also publishes comprehensive reports prepared by the RILEM’s technical committees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信