Addressing data gaps in deriving aquatic life ambient water quality criteria for contaminants of emerging concern: Challenges and the potential of in silico methods

IF 12.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Weigang Liang, Xiaoli Zhao, Xiaolei Wang, Xiao Zhang, Xia Wang
{"title":"Addressing data gaps in deriving aquatic life ambient water quality criteria for contaminants of emerging concern: Challenges and the potential of in silico methods","authors":"Weigang Liang, Xiaoli Zhao, Xiaolei Wang, Xiao Zhang, Xia Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.136770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The international community is becoming increasingly aware of the threats posed by contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) for ecological security. Aquatic life ambient water quality criteria (WQC) are essential for the formulation of risk prevention and control strategies for pollutants by regulatory agencies. Accordingly, we systematically evaluated the current status of WQC development for typical CECs through literature review. The results revealed substantial disparities in the WQC for the same chemical, with the coefficients of variation for all CECs exceeding 0.3. The reliance on low-quality data, high-uncertainty derivation methods, and limited species diversity highlights a substantial data gap. Newly developed <em>in silico</em> methods, with potential to predict the toxicity of untested chemicals, species, and conditions, were classified and integrated into a traditional WQC derivation framework to address the data gap for CECs. However, several challenges remain before such methods can achieve widespread acceptance. These include unstable model performance, the inability to predict chronic toxicity, undefined model applicability, difficulties in specifying toxicity effects and predicting toxicity for certain key species. Future research should prioritize: 1) improving model accuracy by developing specialized models trained with relevant, chemical-specific data or integrating chemical-related features into interspecies models; 2) enhancing species generalizability by developing multispecies models; 3) facilitating the derivation of environmentally relevant WQC by incorporating condition-related features into models; and 4) improving the regulatory acceptability of <em>in silico</em> methods by evaluating the reliability of “black-box” models.","PeriodicalId":361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hazardous Materials","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hazardous Materials","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.136770","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The international community is becoming increasingly aware of the threats posed by contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) for ecological security. Aquatic life ambient water quality criteria (WQC) are essential for the formulation of risk prevention and control strategies for pollutants by regulatory agencies. Accordingly, we systematically evaluated the current status of WQC development for typical CECs through literature review. The results revealed substantial disparities in the WQC for the same chemical, with the coefficients of variation for all CECs exceeding 0.3. The reliance on low-quality data, high-uncertainty derivation methods, and limited species diversity highlights a substantial data gap. Newly developed in silico methods, with potential to predict the toxicity of untested chemicals, species, and conditions, were classified and integrated into a traditional WQC derivation framework to address the data gap for CECs. However, several challenges remain before such methods can achieve widespread acceptance. These include unstable model performance, the inability to predict chronic toxicity, undefined model applicability, difficulties in specifying toxicity effects and predicting toxicity for certain key species. Future research should prioritize: 1) improving model accuracy by developing specialized models trained with relevant, chemical-specific data or integrating chemical-related features into interspecies models; 2) enhancing species generalizability by developing multispecies models; 3) facilitating the derivation of environmentally relevant WQC by incorporating condition-related features into models; and 4) improving the regulatory acceptability of in silico methods by evaluating the reliability of “black-box” models.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Journal of Hazardous Materials 工程技术-工程:环境
CiteScore
25.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
3059
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hazardous Materials serves as a global platform for promoting cutting-edge research in the field of Environmental Science and Engineering. Our publication features a wide range of articles, including full-length research papers, review articles, and perspectives, with the aim of enhancing our understanding of the dangers and risks associated with various materials concerning public health and the environment. It is important to note that the term "environmental contaminants" refers specifically to substances that pose hazardous effects through contamination, while excluding those that do not have such impacts on the environment or human health. Moreover, we emphasize the distinction between wastes and hazardous materials in order to provide further clarity on the scope of the journal. We have a keen interest in exploring specific compounds and microbial agents that have adverse effects on the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信