Evaluating Productivity in Opencast Mines: A Machine Learning Analysis of Drill-Blast and Surface Miner Operations

IF 4.8 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Geleta Warkisa Deressa, Bhanwar Singh Choudhary
{"title":"Evaluating Productivity in Opencast Mines: A Machine Learning Analysis of Drill-Blast and Surface Miner Operations","authors":"Geleta Warkisa Deressa, Bhanwar Singh Choudhary","doi":"10.1007/s11053-024-10429-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Productivity in opencast mining, particularly in drill-blast (DB) and surface miner (SM) operations, is crucial for optimizing efficiency and reducing costs. These operations are directly affected by fragmentation, which in turn impacts equipment utilization, loading cycle times, and downstream operations. This study analyzed field data such as rock properties, machine parameters, blast design results, and post-blast fragmentation size (0.15–0.82 m), with 0.45 m identified as the optimal fragmentation size for a 12 m<sup>3</sup> shovel bucket. Traditional productivity assessments often use simplistic models that fail to capture the complexities of mining operations. To address this, an explainable machine learning (ML) model was developed, integrating fragmentation size, rock and machine parameters, and geometric factors to evaluate DB and SM operations in opencast coal mines. Various ML techniques, such as artificial neural network (ANN), random forest regression (RFR), gradient boosting regressor (GBT), and support vector regression (SVR), were employed to analyze these parameters. Among these, the RFR model demonstrated the highest accuracy, with a coefficients of determination (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>) of 99.5% for training and 99.2% for testing in DB datasets, and 99.9% for training and 99.5% for testing in SM datasets. Furthermore, the RFR model had the lowest root mean square error, mean absolute error, and mean absolute percentage error of 10.35, 4.788, and 2.1% for DB training datasets, and 5.53, 1.75, and 1.5% for SM training datasets, respectively, underscoring its superior performance. Using SHAP (Shapley Additive exPlanations), the study identified key productivity drivers: SM cycle time, diesel consumption, and coal face length. Fragmentation size, resulting from blasting, was also found to influence shovel efficiency and overall productivity significantly. This paper highlights the effectiveness of ensemble ML models in predicting and analyzing complex productivity dynamics in opencast mining.</p>","PeriodicalId":54284,"journal":{"name":"Natural Resources Research","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Resources Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-024-10429-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Productivity in opencast mining, particularly in drill-blast (DB) and surface miner (SM) operations, is crucial for optimizing efficiency and reducing costs. These operations are directly affected by fragmentation, which in turn impacts equipment utilization, loading cycle times, and downstream operations. This study analyzed field data such as rock properties, machine parameters, blast design results, and post-blast fragmentation size (0.15–0.82 m), with 0.45 m identified as the optimal fragmentation size for a 12 m3 shovel bucket. Traditional productivity assessments often use simplistic models that fail to capture the complexities of mining operations. To address this, an explainable machine learning (ML) model was developed, integrating fragmentation size, rock and machine parameters, and geometric factors to evaluate DB and SM operations in opencast coal mines. Various ML techniques, such as artificial neural network (ANN), random forest regression (RFR), gradient boosting regressor (GBT), and support vector regression (SVR), were employed to analyze these parameters. Among these, the RFR model demonstrated the highest accuracy, with a coefficients of determination (R2) of 99.5% for training and 99.2% for testing in DB datasets, and 99.9% for training and 99.5% for testing in SM datasets. Furthermore, the RFR model had the lowest root mean square error, mean absolute error, and mean absolute percentage error of 10.35, 4.788, and 2.1% for DB training datasets, and 5.53, 1.75, and 1.5% for SM training datasets, respectively, underscoring its superior performance. Using SHAP (Shapley Additive exPlanations), the study identified key productivity drivers: SM cycle time, diesel consumption, and coal face length. Fragmentation size, resulting from blasting, was also found to influence shovel efficiency and overall productivity significantly. This paper highlights the effectiveness of ensemble ML models in predicting and analyzing complex productivity dynamics in opencast mining.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Natural Resources Research
Natural Resources Research Environmental Science-General Environmental Science
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: This journal publishes quantitative studies of natural (mainly but not limited to mineral) resources exploration, evaluation and exploitation, including environmental and risk-related aspects. Typical articles use geoscientific data or analyses to assess, test, or compare resource-related aspects. NRR covers a wide variety of resources including minerals, coal, hydrocarbon, geothermal, water, and vegetation. Case studies are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信