Protocol: Complementarity between informal care and formal care to adults: Knowledge mapping through a scoping review of the literature

IF 4 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Marta Osório de Matos, Elzbieta Bobrowicz-Campos, Rosa Silva, Francisca Castanheira, Diana Santos
{"title":"Protocol: Complementarity between informal care and formal care to adults: Knowledge mapping through a scoping review of the literature","authors":"Marta Osório de Matos,&nbsp;Elzbieta Bobrowicz-Campos,&nbsp;Rosa Silva,&nbsp;Francisca Castanheira,&nbsp;Diana Santos","doi":"10.1002/cl2.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The aim of this scoping review is to map, describe and characterize the available evidence on the role that formal care might have in complementing informal caregivers role – romantic partners, parallel family members (e.g., [step]siblings, cousins or in-laws) or descendants (e.g., the care-receivers are [step]parents, [step]aunts/uncles, [step]grandparents or in-laws) – when providing care to adults with acquired diseases (physical or neurologic) in domestic settings and will set the ground for future research on this topic. The scoping review questions are the following: (i) What is the existing literature on the complementarity between formal and informal care? (ii) Which are the types of formal cares' services/interventions that have been described in the literature as complementary to informal care, provided to the informal caregiver and/or to the adult being cared for? (iii) Which outcomes have been assessed in the caregiver's physical, psychological, and social health domains, and how have they been measured?</p>","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"20 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.70004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cl2.70004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The aim of this scoping review is to map, describe and characterize the available evidence on the role that formal care might have in complementing informal caregivers role – romantic partners, parallel family members (e.g., [step]siblings, cousins or in-laws) or descendants (e.g., the care-receivers are [step]parents, [step]aunts/uncles, [step]grandparents or in-laws) – when providing care to adults with acquired diseases (physical or neurologic) in domestic settings and will set the ground for future research on this topic. The scoping review questions are the following: (i) What is the existing literature on the complementarity between formal and informal care? (ii) Which are the types of formal cares' services/interventions that have been described in the literature as complementary to informal care, provided to the informal caregiver and/or to the adult being cared for? (iii) Which outcomes have been assessed in the caregiver's physical, psychological, and social health domains, and how have they been measured?

协议:成人非正式护理和正式护理之间的互补性:通过文献范围审查的知识图谱
这是坎贝尔系统评价的方案。这项范围审查的目的是绘制、描述和描述关于正式照顾可能在补充非正式照顾者角色方面的作用的现有证据——浪漫的伴侣、平行的家庭成员(例如,[继]兄弟姐妹、表亲或姻亲)或后代(例如,照顾接受者是[继]父母、[继]阿姨/叔叔、[继]父母、[继]兄弟姐妹或姻亲)。[继]祖父母或姻亲)-在家庭环境中照顾患有获得性疾病(身体或神经系统)的成年人时,并将为该主题的未来研究奠定基础。范围审查问题如下:(i)关于正式护理和非正式护理之间互补性的现有文献是什么?(ii)哪些类型的正式护理服务/干预措施在文献中被描述为非正式护理的补充,提供给非正式护理者和/或被照顾的成年人?(三)在照顾者的身体、心理和社会健康方面评估了哪些结果,以及如何衡量这些结果?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Campbell Systematic Reviews
Campbell Systematic Reviews Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
21.90%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信