Motor cortex excitability in restless legs syndrome: A systematic review and insights into pathophysiology via transcranial magnetic stimulation

IF 11.2 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Giuseppe Lanza , Maria Paola Mogavero , Raffaele Ferri , Tapas Pani
{"title":"Motor cortex excitability in restless legs syndrome: A systematic review and insights into pathophysiology via transcranial magnetic stimulation","authors":"Giuseppe Lanza ,&nbsp;Maria Paola Mogavero ,&nbsp;Raffaele Ferri ,&nbsp;Tapas Pani","doi":"10.1016/j.smrv.2024.102027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) is a neurological disorder characterized by a complex and only partially understood pathophysiology. Numerous studies have investigated motor cortex excitability in RLS using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), but a comprehensive systematic review assessing their methodological quality and synthesizing their findings is lacking. A systematic search of PubMed focused on various TMS parameters, including resting and active motor thresholds, motor evoked potential characteristics, contralateral and ipsilateral silent periods, and multiple measures of intracortical inhibition and facilitation. The quality of each study was evaluated using custom checklists and the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Out of the studies screened, 21 (comprising 319 RLS patients and 278 healthy controls) met the inclusion criteria. Despite considerable variability in TMS methodologies—such as differences in the muscles tested, interstimulus intervals, testing timing, and the potential confounding effects of medications—a consistent finding was a reduction in short-interval intracortical inhibition, a key indicator of central inhibitory GABAergic activity. Additionally, altered post-exercise facilitation and delayed facilitation suggest abnormal motor plasticity in RLS patients. These findings suggest that despite the methodological heterogeneity, TMS abnormalities may play a crucial role in the pathophysiology of RLS. In this context, RLS symptoms are likely to originate at different levels within a complex neural network, ultimately leading to altered, possibly transient and circadian, excitability in a multifaceted neurophysiological system. While further rigorous research and reproducible evidence are needed, these insights may contribute to the identification of new diagnostic markers and the development of innovative therapeutic strategies for RLS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49513,"journal":{"name":"Sleep Medicine Reviews","volume":"79 ","pages":"Article 102027"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep Medicine Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S108707922400131X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) is a neurological disorder characterized by a complex and only partially understood pathophysiology. Numerous studies have investigated motor cortex excitability in RLS using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), but a comprehensive systematic review assessing their methodological quality and synthesizing their findings is lacking. A systematic search of PubMed focused on various TMS parameters, including resting and active motor thresholds, motor evoked potential characteristics, contralateral and ipsilateral silent periods, and multiple measures of intracortical inhibition and facilitation. The quality of each study was evaluated using custom checklists and the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Out of the studies screened, 21 (comprising 319 RLS patients and 278 healthy controls) met the inclusion criteria. Despite considerable variability in TMS methodologies—such as differences in the muscles tested, interstimulus intervals, testing timing, and the potential confounding effects of medications—a consistent finding was a reduction in short-interval intracortical inhibition, a key indicator of central inhibitory GABAergic activity. Additionally, altered post-exercise facilitation and delayed facilitation suggest abnormal motor plasticity in RLS patients. These findings suggest that despite the methodological heterogeneity, TMS abnormalities may play a crucial role in the pathophysiology of RLS. In this context, RLS symptoms are likely to originate at different levels within a complex neural network, ultimately leading to altered, possibly transient and circadian, excitability in a multifaceted neurophysiological system. While further rigorous research and reproducible evidence are needed, these insights may contribute to the identification of new diagnostic markers and the development of innovative therapeutic strategies for RLS.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sleep Medicine Reviews
Sleep Medicine Reviews 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
20.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Sleep Medicine Reviews offers global coverage of sleep disorders, exploring their origins, diagnosis, treatment, and implications for related conditions at both individual and public health levels. Articles comprehensively review clinical information from peer-reviewed journals across various disciplines in sleep medicine, encompassing pulmonology, psychiatry, psychology, physiology, otolaryngology, pediatrics, geriatrics, cardiology, dentistry, nursing, neurology, and general medicine. The journal features narrative reviews, systematic reviews, and editorials addressing areas of controversy, debate, and future research within the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信