Revealing air quality impacts of the clean heating campaign in northern China

IF 13.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Yichao He , Huili Wang , Yixuan Zheng , Yueyi Feng , Xiaojun Chen , Ling Jin , Yu Lei
{"title":"Revealing air quality impacts of the clean heating campaign in northern China","authors":"Yichao He ,&nbsp;Huili Wang ,&nbsp;Yixuan Zheng ,&nbsp;Yueyi Feng ,&nbsp;Xiaojun Chen ,&nbsp;Ling Jin ,&nbsp;Yu Lei","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To mitigate air pollution caused by bulk coal burning for heating in northern China during winter, the Chinese government initiated a clean heating campaign in Beijing and the surrounding region starting in 2017. The impact of this historic campaign remained unclear at a fine spatial and temporal resolution. Based on the annually updated high spatial resolution surveyed coal substitution data, this study coupled the multi-period difference-in-differences (DID) model with the two-stage DID model and found that bulk coal substitution would have led to a spatially and temporally averaged reduction by 4.0 μg/m<sup>3</sup> in wintertime PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration over Beijing and the surrounding region. Furthermore, taking advantage of the spatially disaggregated data, spillover effects associated with air pollution transportation were further quantified. Considering these effects, the estimated air quality benefit would increase to 8.2 μg/m<sup>3</sup>. Additionally, these benefits exhibit sustainability, with the fourth year post-implementation 3.6 times greater than the initial year, suggesting cumulative effects of the policy. On average, every 1kt of bulk coal substitution resulted to 0.3 μg/m<sup>3</sup> PM<sub>2.5</sub> reduction at a 0.1° × 0.1° grid. These findings, validated through extensive robustness testing, underscore the effectiveness and sustainability of the clean heating campaign and would offer valuable insights for relevant policy formulation in China or other developing countries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"141 ","pages":"Article 108078"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324007874","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To mitigate air pollution caused by bulk coal burning for heating in northern China during winter, the Chinese government initiated a clean heating campaign in Beijing and the surrounding region starting in 2017. The impact of this historic campaign remained unclear at a fine spatial and temporal resolution. Based on the annually updated high spatial resolution surveyed coal substitution data, this study coupled the multi-period difference-in-differences (DID) model with the two-stage DID model and found that bulk coal substitution would have led to a spatially and temporally averaged reduction by 4.0 μg/m3 in wintertime PM2.5 concentration over Beijing and the surrounding region. Furthermore, taking advantage of the spatially disaggregated data, spillover effects associated with air pollution transportation were further quantified. Considering these effects, the estimated air quality benefit would increase to 8.2 μg/m3. Additionally, these benefits exhibit sustainability, with the fourth year post-implementation 3.6 times greater than the initial year, suggesting cumulative effects of the policy. On average, every 1kt of bulk coal substitution resulted to 0.3 μg/m3 PM2.5 reduction at a 0.1° × 0.1° grid. These findings, validated through extensive robustness testing, underscore the effectiveness and sustainability of the clean heating campaign and would offer valuable insights for relevant policy formulation in China or other developing countries.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信