Junhui Gong , Xiaolu Sun , Michael A. Delichatsios
{"title":"Accelerated piloted ignition on an edge of a PMMA cube","authors":"Junhui Gong , Xiaolu Sun , Michael A. Delichatsios","doi":"10.1016/j.firesaf.2024.104296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ignition on solid edges is easier compared to that on flat surfaces, featuring higher fire hazard. To reveal this unique ignition mechanism, an apparatus capable of emitting two horizontal perpendicular heat fluxes, defined as <em>q</em><sub><em>1</em></sub> and <em>q</em><sub><em>2</em></sub>, was built to conduct piloted ignition tests on vertical edges of PMMA cubes. Two sets of tests were designed: (1) <em>q</em><sub><em>1</em></sub> = <em>q</em><sub><em>2</em></sub>, denoted as SET1; (2) <em>q</em><sub><em>1</em></sub> remained unchanged while <em>q</em><sub><em>2</em></sub> varied, denoted as SET2. For comparison, 1D ignition tests of vertical samples were also performed. Edge and surface temperatures, mass loss rate (MLR), and ignition time (<em>t</em><sub><em>ig</em></sub>) were collected. Results showed that ignition on edge was accelerated compared to 1D ignition. The numerical solver neglecting edge regression captured measured surface temperature but overpredicted edge temperature. Attributed by the same reason, experimental MLRs and <em>t</em><sub><em>ig</em></sub> of SET1 and SET2 cannot be accurately estimated by the numerical model. Critical MLR in SET1 and SET2 declined with lower heat flux but remained unchanged in 1D ignition. Critical temperature was identified to be 656.4 ± 3.5 K. In SET1, <em>t</em><em><sub>ig</sub></em><em><sup>-0.5</sup></em> linearly depended on heat flux, whereas no such linearity existed in SET2. Using measured <em>t</em><sub><em>ig</em></sub> and analytical models, thermal inertia of PMMA and critical heat flux were estimated.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50445,"journal":{"name":"Fire Safety Journal","volume":"151 ","pages":"Article 104296"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fire Safety Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379711224002091","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Ignition on solid edges is easier compared to that on flat surfaces, featuring higher fire hazard. To reveal this unique ignition mechanism, an apparatus capable of emitting two horizontal perpendicular heat fluxes, defined as q1 and q2, was built to conduct piloted ignition tests on vertical edges of PMMA cubes. Two sets of tests were designed: (1) q1 = q2, denoted as SET1; (2) q1 remained unchanged while q2 varied, denoted as SET2. For comparison, 1D ignition tests of vertical samples were also performed. Edge and surface temperatures, mass loss rate (MLR), and ignition time (tig) were collected. Results showed that ignition on edge was accelerated compared to 1D ignition. The numerical solver neglecting edge regression captured measured surface temperature but overpredicted edge temperature. Attributed by the same reason, experimental MLRs and tig of SET1 and SET2 cannot be accurately estimated by the numerical model. Critical MLR in SET1 and SET2 declined with lower heat flux but remained unchanged in 1D ignition. Critical temperature was identified to be 656.4 ± 3.5 K. In SET1, tig-0.5 linearly depended on heat flux, whereas no such linearity existed in SET2. Using measured tig and analytical models, thermal inertia of PMMA and critical heat flux were estimated.
期刊介绍:
Fire Safety Journal is the leading publication dealing with all aspects of fire safety engineering. Its scope is purposefully wide, as it is deemed important to encourage papers from all sources within this multidisciplinary subject, thus providing a forum for its further development as a distinct engineering discipline. This is an essential step towards gaining a status equal to that enjoyed by the other engineering disciplines.