Energy transformation and industrial closures: Lessons for just transitions from the nationalized British coal industry

IF 3.6 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Andrew Perchard , Keith Gildart
{"title":"Energy transformation and industrial closures: Lessons for just transitions from the nationalized British coal industry","authors":"Andrew Perchard ,&nbsp;Keith Gildart","doi":"10.1016/j.exis.2024.101576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This viewpoint draws on our major historical study of the nationalised British coal industry (1947–1994), the largest state-owned enterprise outside the Soviet bloc upon its formation, to explore the potential of history in better understanding ‘just transitions’. It explores the value of history to explicating such complex processes and also the pitfalls in history's misuse. It also explains what it is to think historically and the perspectives and methods that historians utilise, highlighting the benefits of consilience across history and the social sciences, before exploring what the evidence from nationalised British coal offers to understandings of ‘just transitions’. It concludes with a number of implications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47848,"journal":{"name":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 101576"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X24001722","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This viewpoint draws on our major historical study of the nationalised British coal industry (1947–1994), the largest state-owned enterprise outside the Soviet bloc upon its formation, to explore the potential of history in better understanding ‘just transitions’. It explores the value of history to explicating such complex processes and also the pitfalls in history's misuse. It also explains what it is to think historically and the perspectives and methods that historians utilise, highlighting the benefits of consilience across history and the social sciences, before exploring what the evidence from nationalised British coal offers to understandings of ‘just transitions’. It concludes with a number of implications.
能源转型与工业关闭:英国国有化煤炭工业转型的经验教训
这一观点借鉴了我们对国有化的英国煤炭工业(1947-1994)的主要历史研究,这是苏联集团之外最大的国有企业,在其形成之初,探索历史的潜力,以更好地理解“公正的过渡”。它探讨了历史对解释这一复杂过程的价值,以及历史误用的陷阱。它还解释了什么是历史思考,以及历史学家使用的观点和方法,强调了历史和社会科学之间一致性的好处,然后探索了英国煤炭国有化的证据为理解“公正过渡”提供了什么。它总结了一些暗示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信