Encuesta Nacional sobre la Práctica Clínica en Analgesia Obstétrica en España

IF 0.9 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
L. Hernández González , N. Brogly , S. Manrique Muñoz , C. Suárez Castaño , G. Yerga Pozo , M. Raynard Ortiz , E. Guasch Arévalo
{"title":"Encuesta Nacional sobre la Práctica Clínica en Analgesia Obstétrica en España","authors":"L. Hernández González ,&nbsp;N. Brogly ,&nbsp;S. Manrique Muñoz ,&nbsp;C. Suárez Castaño ,&nbsp;G. Yerga Pozo ,&nbsp;M. Raynard Ortiz ,&nbsp;E. Guasch Arévalo","doi":"10.1016/j.redar.2024.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>A national survey was conducted among maternity hospitals nationwide to understand the variability in clinical practice for obstetric analgesia and to reach a consensus on optimal care in the future in Spain.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Spanish experts in obstetric anesthesiology designed a survey on the practice of obstetric analgesia during childbirth, following a Delphi process. The survey was sent to 195 Spanish maternity hospitals between April and September 2022 using Google Forms. A descriptive study of the results was performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Responses were obtained from 108 centers (55.4%), of which 88 (83.8%) were public hospitals. The most commonly used technique was epidural analgesia in 97 (92.4%) centers. Nine (8.6%) centers used the combined spinal-epidural (CSE) technique, 5 (4.8%) used spinal analgesia, and 3 (2.9%) used dural puncture epidural (DPE) analgesia. The most commonly used local anesthetic was levobupivacaine 0.1-0.25% in 82 (78.1%) centers. Fentanyl or sufentanil were added to the local anesthetic in 96 (91.4%) centers. Epidural maintenance was performed with continuous epidural infusion (CEI) + patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) or programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) + PCEA in 64 (60.9%) and 33 (30.5%) centers, respectively. Fifteen (14.3%) centers lacked alternative techniques to epidural analgesia and 25 (23.8%) did not follow obstetric analgesia protocols.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Despite the variability in clinical practice for obstetric analgesia in Spain, the vast majority of centers follow recommendations in this field. There is room for improvement, which should be considered a fundamental strategy for progressing towards excellence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46479,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion","volume":"71 10","pages":"Pages 732-739"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034935624001208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

A national survey was conducted among maternity hospitals nationwide to understand the variability in clinical practice for obstetric analgesia and to reach a consensus on optimal care in the future in Spain.

Materials and methods

Spanish experts in obstetric anesthesiology designed a survey on the practice of obstetric analgesia during childbirth, following a Delphi process. The survey was sent to 195 Spanish maternity hospitals between April and September 2022 using Google Forms. A descriptive study of the results was performed.

Results

Responses were obtained from 108 centers (55.4%), of which 88 (83.8%) were public hospitals. The most commonly used technique was epidural analgesia in 97 (92.4%) centers. Nine (8.6%) centers used the combined spinal-epidural (CSE) technique, 5 (4.8%) used spinal analgesia, and 3 (2.9%) used dural puncture epidural (DPE) analgesia. The most commonly used local anesthetic was levobupivacaine 0.1-0.25% in 82 (78.1%) centers. Fentanyl or sufentanil were added to the local anesthetic in 96 (91.4%) centers. Epidural maintenance was performed with continuous epidural infusion (CEI) + patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) or programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) + PCEA in 64 (60.9%) and 33 (30.5%) centers, respectively. Fifteen (14.3%) centers lacked alternative techniques to epidural analgesia and 25 (23.8%) did not follow obstetric analgesia protocols.

Conclusion

Despite the variability in clinical practice for obstetric analgesia in Spain, the vast majority of centers follow recommendations in this field. There is room for improvement, which should be considered a fundamental strategy for progressing towards excellence.
关于西班牙产科镇痛临床实践的全国调查
在全国妇产医院中进行了一项全国性调查,以了解产科镇痛临床实践的可变性,并就西班牙未来的最佳护理达成共识。材料和方法西班牙产科麻醉学专家设计了一项关于分娩期间产科镇痛实践的调查,遵循德尔菲过程。该调查于2022年4月至9月期间使用谷歌表格向西班牙195家妇产医院发送。对结果进行了描述性研究。结果共获得108个中心(55.4%)的反馈,其中公立医院88个(83.8%)。97个中心(92.4%)最常用的方法是硬膜外镇痛。9个中心(8.6%)采用脊髓-硬膜外联合(CSE)技术,5个中心(4.8%)采用脊髓镇痛,3个中心(2.9%)采用硬膜穿刺硬膜外(DPE)镇痛。82个中心(78.1%)最常用的局麻药为左布比卡因0.1 ~ 0.25%。96个中心(91.4%)在局麻药中添加芬太尼或舒芬太尼。在64个中心(60.9%)和33个中心(30.5%)分别采用连续硬膜外输液(CEI) +患者自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA)或计划性间歇硬膜外灌注(PIEB) + PCEA进行硬膜外维持。15个(14.3%)中心缺乏硬膜外镇痛的替代技术,25个(23.8%)中心没有遵循产科镇痛方案。结论:尽管西班牙产科镇痛的临床实践存在差异,但绝大多数中心都遵循这一领域的建议。还有改进的余地,这应该被视为迈向卓越的基本战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
113
审稿时长
82 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信