Validez de la velocidad estimada de onda de pulso aórtica medida durante la prueba de caminata de 6 minutos para predecir la capacidad anaeróbica antes de la cirugía mayor no cardiaca
J. Ripollés-Melchor , M.I. Monge García , A. Ruiz-Escobar , E. Sáez-Ruiz , B. Algar-Yañez , A. Abad-Motos , A. Abad-Gurumeta
{"title":"Validez de la velocidad estimada de onda de pulso aórtica medida durante la prueba de caminata de 6 minutos para predecir la capacidad anaeróbica antes de la cirugía mayor no cardiaca","authors":"J. Ripollés-Melchor , M.I. Monge García , A. Ruiz-Escobar , E. Sáez-Ruiz , B. Algar-Yañez , A. Abad-Motos , A. Abad-Gurumeta","doi":"10.1016/j.redar.2024.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study aimed to assess the efficacy of estimated preoperative aortic pulse wave velocity (AoPWV) to discriminate between low and high 6<!--> <!-->min walk test (6MWT) distance in patients awaiting major non-cardiac surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Prospective observational study in 133 patients ungergoing non cardiac surgery. AoPWV and the distance walked during a 6MWT were assessed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine two different AoPWV cut-points for predicting a distance of 427 m in the 6MWT. We also calculated lower and upper AoPWV cut-points (probability ≥<!--> <!-->0.75) for predicting a distance of <<!--> <!-->427<!--> <!-->m, ≥<!--> <!-->427<!--> <!-->m, and also 563<!--> <!-->m in the 6MWT.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The ROC curve analysis for the <<!--> <!-->427<!--> <!-->m distance revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.68 (95% confidence interval: 0.56–-0.79) and an AUC of 0.72 (95% confidence interval: 0.61-0.83) for ><!--> <!-->563<!--> <!-->m. Patients with AoPWV ><!--> <!-->10.97<!--> <!-->m/s should be considered higher risk, while those with <<!--> <!-->9.42<!--> <!-->m/s can be considered low risk.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>AoPWV is a simple, non-invasive, useful clinical tool for identifying and stratifying patients awaiting major non-cardiac surgery. In situations of clinical uncertainty, additional measures should be taken to assess the risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46479,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion","volume":"71 10","pages":"Pages 710-718"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034935624000999","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
This study aimed to assess the efficacy of estimated preoperative aortic pulse wave velocity (AoPWV) to discriminate between low and high 6 min walk test (6MWT) distance in patients awaiting major non-cardiac surgery.
Methods
Prospective observational study in 133 patients ungergoing non cardiac surgery. AoPWV and the distance walked during a 6MWT were assessed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine two different AoPWV cut-points for predicting a distance of 427 m in the 6MWT. We also calculated lower and upper AoPWV cut-points (probability ≥ 0.75) for predicting a distance of < 427 m, ≥ 427 m, and also 563 m in the 6MWT.
Results
The ROC curve analysis for the < 427 m distance revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.68 (95% confidence interval: 0.56–-0.79) and an AUC of 0.72 (95% confidence interval: 0.61-0.83) for > 563 m. Patients with AoPWV > 10.97 m/s should be considered higher risk, while those with < 9.42 m/s can be considered low risk.
Conclusions
AoPWV is a simple, non-invasive, useful clinical tool for identifying and stratifying patients awaiting major non-cardiac surgery. In situations of clinical uncertainty, additional measures should be taken to assess the risk.