Efficacy of esketamine nasal spray over quetiapine extended release over the short and long term: sensitivity analyses of ESCAPE-TRD, a randomised phase IIIb clinical trial

Allan H. Young, Pierre-Michel Llorca, Andrea Fagiolini, Peter Falkai, Narcís Cardoner, René E. Nielsen, Ola Blomqvist, Yordan Godinov, Benoît Rive, Joris Diels, Siobhán Mulhern-Haughey, Andreas Reif
{"title":"Efficacy of esketamine nasal spray over quetiapine extended release over the short and long term: sensitivity analyses of ESCAPE-TRD, a randomised phase IIIb clinical trial","authors":"Allan H. Young, Pierre-Michel Llorca, Andrea Fagiolini, Peter Falkai, Narcís Cardoner, René E. Nielsen, Ola Blomqvist, Yordan Godinov, Benoît Rive, Joris Diels, Siobhán Mulhern-Haughey, Andreas Reif","doi":"10.1192/bjp.2024.124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span>Background</span><p>In patients with treatment resistant depression (TRD), the ESCAPE-TRD study showed esketamine nasal spray was superior to quetiapine extended release.</p><span>Aims</span><p>To determine the robustness of the ESCAPE-TRD results and confirm the superiority of esketamine nasal spray over quetiapine extended release.</p><span>Method</span><p>ESCAPE-TRD was a randomised, open-label, rater-blinded, active-controlled phase IIIb trial. Patients had TRD (i.e. non-response to two or more antidepressive treatments within a major depressive episode). Patients were randomised 1:1 to flexibly dosed esketamine nasal spray or quetiapine extended release, while continuing an ongoing selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor/serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. The primary end-point was achieving a Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale score of ≤10 at Week 8, while the key secondary end-point was remaining relapse free through Week 32 after achieving remission at Week 8. Sensitivity analyses were performed on these end-points by varying the definition of remission based on timepoint, threshold and scale.</p><span>Results</span><p>Of 676 patients, 336 were randomised to esketamine nasal spray and 340 to quetiapine extended release. All sensitivity analyses on the primary and key secondary end-point favoured esketamine nasal spray over quetiapine extended release, with relative risks ranging from 1.462 to 1.737 and from 1.417 to 1.838, respectively (all <span>p</span> &lt; 0.05). Treatment with esketamine nasal spray shortened time to first and confirmed remission (hazard ratio: 1.711 [95% confidence interval 1.402, 2.087], <span>p</span> &lt; 0.001; 1.658 [1.337, 2.055], <span>p</span> &lt; 0.001).</p><span>Conclusion</span><p>Esketamine nasal spray consistently demonstrated significant superiority over quetiapine extended release using all pre-specified definitions for remission and relapse. Sensitivity analyses supported the conclusions of the primary ESCAPE-TRD analysis and demonstrated robustness of the results.</p>","PeriodicalId":22495,"journal":{"name":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2024.124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In patients with treatment resistant depression (TRD), the ESCAPE-TRD study showed esketamine nasal spray was superior to quetiapine extended release.

Aims

To determine the robustness of the ESCAPE-TRD results and confirm the superiority of esketamine nasal spray over quetiapine extended release.

Method

ESCAPE-TRD was a randomised, open-label, rater-blinded, active-controlled phase IIIb trial. Patients had TRD (i.e. non-response to two or more antidepressive treatments within a major depressive episode). Patients were randomised 1:1 to flexibly dosed esketamine nasal spray or quetiapine extended release, while continuing an ongoing selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor/serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. The primary end-point was achieving a Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale score of ≤10 at Week 8, while the key secondary end-point was remaining relapse free through Week 32 after achieving remission at Week 8. Sensitivity analyses were performed on these end-points by varying the definition of remission based on timepoint, threshold and scale.

Results

Of 676 patients, 336 were randomised to esketamine nasal spray and 340 to quetiapine extended release. All sensitivity analyses on the primary and key secondary end-point favoured esketamine nasal spray over quetiapine extended release, with relative risks ranging from 1.462 to 1.737 and from 1.417 to 1.838, respectively (all p < 0.05). Treatment with esketamine nasal spray shortened time to first and confirmed remission (hazard ratio: 1.711 [95% confidence interval 1.402, 2.087], p < 0.001; 1.658 [1.337, 2.055], p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Esketamine nasal spray consistently demonstrated significant superiority over quetiapine extended release using all pre-specified definitions for remission and relapse. Sensitivity analyses supported the conclusions of the primary ESCAPE-TRD analysis and demonstrated robustness of the results.

艾氯胺酮鼻喷雾剂的短期和长期疗效优于喹硫平缓释片:ESCAPE-TRD的敏感性分析,一项随机iii期临床试验
在难治性抑郁症(TRD)患者中,ESCAPE-TRD研究显示艾氯胺酮鼻腔喷雾剂优于喹硫平缓释片。目的确定ESCAPE-TRD结果的稳健性,确认艾氯胺酮鼻喷雾剂优于喹硫平缓释片。MethodESCAPE-TRD是一项随机、开放标签、非盲、主动对照的IIIb期试验。患者有TRD(即在一次重度抑郁发作中对两种或两种以上抗抑郁治疗无反应)。患者按1:1随机分配至灵活剂量的艾氯胺酮鼻喷雾剂或喹硫平缓释片,同时继续使用选择性5 -羟色胺再摄取抑制剂/ 5 -羟色胺去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂。主要终点是在第8周达到Montgomery -Åsberg抑郁评定量表得分≤10,而关键的次要终点是在第8周达到缓解后,在第32周保持无复发。通过改变基于时间点、阈值和量表的缓解定义,对这些终点进行敏感性分析。结果676例患者中,336例随机分为艾氯胺酮鼻腔喷雾剂组,340例随机分为喹硫平缓释组。所有主要终点和关键次要终点的敏感性分析均倾向于艾氯胺酮鼻喷雾剂而不是喹硫平缓释,相对风险分别为1.462至1.737和1.417至1.838(均p <;0.05)。艾氯胺酮鼻腔喷雾剂缩短了首次缓解和确诊缓解的时间(风险比:1.711[95%可信区间1.402,2.087],p <;0.001;1.658 [1.337, 2.055], p <;0.001)。结论艾氯胺酮鼻喷雾剂在缓解和复发方面均优于喹硫平缓释片。敏感性分析支持初步ESCAPE-TRD分析的结论,并证明了结果的稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信