Verbal fluency in Greek: Performance differences between L1Greek-L2English late bilingual and Greek monolingual speakers

IF 2.5 1区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Dimitra Lazaridou-Chatzigoga, Artemis Alexiadou
{"title":"Verbal fluency in Greek: Performance differences between L1Greek-L2English late bilingual and Greek monolingual speakers","authors":"Dimitra Lazaridou-Chatzigoga, Artemis Alexiadou","doi":"10.1017/s1366728924000671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Verbal fluency data for semantic (animals, fruit and vegetables and objects) and formal fluency (<span>X</span> [Chi], <span>Σ</span> [Sigma] <span>Α</span> [Alpha]) were collected from 32 L1Greek-L2English late bilingual speakers and 32 Greek monolinguals. The verbal fluency task has been used in both language attrition and bilingualism studies. Language attrition studies, which mostly employ only the semantic task, show that bilinguals perform worse than monolinguals. In bilingualism studies, which employ both the semantic and formal tasks, we find greater variance and the results are mixed (bilinguals perform similarly, better or poorly compared to monolinguals). In our study, we investigated quantitative measures (number of correct responses) and strategic processes (clustering, switching). In the quantitative measures, monolinguals outperformed bilinguals in both tasks with the difference being more pronounced in the semantic task. In clustering, both groups behaved similarly, while in switching monolinguals performed better than bilinguals. The implications of these results are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":8758,"journal":{"name":"Bilingualism: Language and Cognition","volume":"77 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bilingualism: Language and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728924000671","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Verbal fluency data for semantic (animals, fruit and vegetables and objects) and formal fluency (X [Chi], Σ [Sigma] Α [Alpha]) were collected from 32 L1Greek-L2English late bilingual speakers and 32 Greek monolinguals. The verbal fluency task has been used in both language attrition and bilingualism studies. Language attrition studies, which mostly employ only the semantic task, show that bilinguals perform worse than monolinguals. In bilingualism studies, which employ both the semantic and formal tasks, we find greater variance and the results are mixed (bilinguals perform similarly, better or poorly compared to monolinguals). In our study, we investigated quantitative measures (number of correct responses) and strategic processes (clustering, switching). In the quantitative measures, monolinguals outperformed bilinguals in both tasks with the difference being more pronounced in the semantic task. In clustering, both groups behaved similarly, while in switching monolinguals performed better than bilinguals. The implications of these results are discussed.

希腊语的语言流畅性:希腊-英语晚期双语者和希腊单语者的表现差异
本文收集了32名希腊-英语晚期双语者和32名希腊单语者的语义(动物、水果、蔬菜和物体)和形式流畅性(X [Chi], Σ [Sigma] Α [Alpha])的语言流畅性数据。语言流畅性任务在语言消耗和双语研究中都有应用。语言消耗研究,大多只采用语义任务,表明双语者比单语者表现更差。在使用语义和形式任务的双语研究中,我们发现更大的差异和结果是混合的(与单语者相比,双语者的表现相似,更好或更差)。在我们的研究中,我们调查了定量措施(正确回答的数量)和战略过程(聚类,切换)。在定量测试中,单语者在两项任务中的表现均优于双语者,但在语义任务中差异更为明显。在聚类方面,两组表现相似,而在转换方面,单语者比双语者表现更好。讨论了这些结果的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
86
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信