Yishan Chen , Jingsong Yi , Shunhe Lin , Xi Xie , Xishi Liu , Sun-Wei Guo
{"title":"Reproductive outcomes of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation and myomectomy for uterine fibroids: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Yishan Chen , Jingsong Yi , Shunhe Lin , Xi Xie , Xishi Liu , Sun-Wei Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Research question</h3><div>Does high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation have comparable reproductive outcomes to myomectomy for patients with uterine fibroids?</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A systematic review and a meta-analysis of data extracted from published studies up to March 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Through a more structured analysis, HIFU treatment yielded a pooled pregnancy rate of 23.3% (95% CI 11.5 to 37.6%) and a pooled live birth rate (LBR) of 17.3% (95% CI 7.8 to 29.3%), significantly lower than those after myomectomy, which had a pooled pregnancy rate of 56.9% (95% CI 45.6 to 67.9%) and a pooled LBR of 44.1% (95% CI 34.9 to 53.4%) (<em>P</em> = 0.0001 and <em>P</em> = 0.0003, respectively). After controlling for patient age, ultrasound-guided HIFU studies reported significantly lower pregnancy rate and LBR compared with myomectomy. Moreover, studies enrolling younger patients and explicitly recruiting those desiring to conceive reported better reproductive outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients with uterine fibroids undergoing HIFU treatment and desiring to preserve their uteri resulted in poorer reproductive outcomes compared with myomectomy. Although uterine fibroids are now the number one disease that receives HIFU treatment worldwide, the overall quality in design and execution of HIFU studies on reproductive outcomes for women with uterine fibroids leaves much room for improvement. Above all, comparative trials against the standard of care are badly needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21134,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive biomedicine online","volume":"50 1","pages":"Article 104436"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive biomedicine online","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472648324006254","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Research question
Does high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation have comparable reproductive outcomes to myomectomy for patients with uterine fibroids?
Design
A systematic review and a meta-analysis of data extracted from published studies up to March 2024.
Results
Through a more structured analysis, HIFU treatment yielded a pooled pregnancy rate of 23.3% (95% CI 11.5 to 37.6%) and a pooled live birth rate (LBR) of 17.3% (95% CI 7.8 to 29.3%), significantly lower than those after myomectomy, which had a pooled pregnancy rate of 56.9% (95% CI 45.6 to 67.9%) and a pooled LBR of 44.1% (95% CI 34.9 to 53.4%) (P = 0.0001 and P = 0.0003, respectively). After controlling for patient age, ultrasound-guided HIFU studies reported significantly lower pregnancy rate and LBR compared with myomectomy. Moreover, studies enrolling younger patients and explicitly recruiting those desiring to conceive reported better reproductive outcomes.
Conclusions
Patients with uterine fibroids undergoing HIFU treatment and desiring to preserve their uteri resulted in poorer reproductive outcomes compared with myomectomy. Although uterine fibroids are now the number one disease that receives HIFU treatment worldwide, the overall quality in design and execution of HIFU studies on reproductive outcomes for women with uterine fibroids leaves much room for improvement. Above all, comparative trials against the standard of care are badly needed.
期刊介绍:
Reproductive BioMedicine Online covers the formation, growth and differentiation of the human embryo. It is intended to bring to public attention new research on biological and clinical research on human reproduction and the human embryo including relevant studies on animals. It is published by a group of scientists and clinicians working in these fields of study. Its audience comprises researchers, clinicians, practitioners, academics and patients.
Context:
The period of human embryonic growth covered is between the formation of the primordial germ cells in the fetus until mid-pregnancy. High quality research on lower animals is included if it helps to clarify the human situation. Studies progressing to birth and later are published if they have a direct bearing on events in the earlier stages of pregnancy.