Reproductive outcomes of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation and myomectomy for uterine fibroids: a systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Yishan Chen , Jingsong Yi , Shunhe Lin , Xi Xie , Xishi Liu , Sun-Wei Guo
{"title":"Reproductive outcomes of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation and myomectomy for uterine fibroids: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Yishan Chen ,&nbsp;Jingsong Yi ,&nbsp;Shunhe Lin ,&nbsp;Xi Xie ,&nbsp;Xishi Liu ,&nbsp;Sun-Wei Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Research question</h3><div>Does high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation have comparable reproductive outcomes to myomectomy for patients with uterine fibroids?</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A systematic review and a meta-analysis of data extracted from published studies up to March 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Through a more structured analysis, HIFU treatment yielded a pooled pregnancy rate of 23.3% (95% CI 11.5 to 37.6%) and a pooled live birth rate (LBR) of 17.3% (95% CI 7.8 to 29.3%), significantly lower than those after myomectomy, which had a pooled pregnancy rate of 56.9% (95% CI 45.6 to 67.9%) and a pooled LBR of 44.1% (95% CI 34.9 to 53.4%) (<em>P</em> = 0.0001 and <em>P</em> = 0.0003, respectively). After controlling for patient age, ultrasound-guided HIFU studies reported significantly lower pregnancy rate and LBR compared with myomectomy. Moreover, studies enrolling younger patients and explicitly recruiting those desiring to conceive reported better reproductive outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients with uterine fibroids undergoing HIFU treatment and desiring to preserve their uteri resulted in poorer reproductive outcomes compared with myomectomy. Although uterine fibroids are now the number one disease that receives HIFU treatment worldwide, the overall quality in design and execution of HIFU studies on reproductive outcomes for women with uterine fibroids leaves much room for improvement. Above all, comparative trials against the standard of care are badly needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21134,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive biomedicine online","volume":"50 1","pages":"Article 104436"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive biomedicine online","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472648324006254","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research question

Does high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation have comparable reproductive outcomes to myomectomy for patients with uterine fibroids?

Design

A systematic review and a meta-analysis of data extracted from published studies up to March 2024.

Results

Through a more structured analysis, HIFU treatment yielded a pooled pregnancy rate of 23.3% (95% CI 11.5 to 37.6%) and a pooled live birth rate (LBR) of 17.3% (95% CI 7.8 to 29.3%), significantly lower than those after myomectomy, which had a pooled pregnancy rate of 56.9% (95% CI 45.6 to 67.9%) and a pooled LBR of 44.1% (95% CI 34.9 to 53.4%) (P = 0.0001 and P = 0.0003, respectively). After controlling for patient age, ultrasound-guided HIFU studies reported significantly lower pregnancy rate and LBR compared with myomectomy. Moreover, studies enrolling younger patients and explicitly recruiting those desiring to conceive reported better reproductive outcomes.

Conclusions

Patients with uterine fibroids undergoing HIFU treatment and desiring to preserve their uteri resulted in poorer reproductive outcomes compared with myomectomy. Although uterine fibroids are now the number one disease that receives HIFU treatment worldwide, the overall quality in design and execution of HIFU studies on reproductive outcomes for women with uterine fibroids leaves much room for improvement. Above all, comparative trials against the standard of care are badly needed.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reproductive biomedicine online
Reproductive biomedicine online 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.50%
发文量
391
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Reproductive BioMedicine Online covers the formation, growth and differentiation of the human embryo. It is intended to bring to public attention new research on biological and clinical research on human reproduction and the human embryo including relevant studies on animals. It is published by a group of scientists and clinicians working in these fields of study. Its audience comprises researchers, clinicians, practitioners, academics and patients. Context: The period of human embryonic growth covered is between the formation of the primordial germ cells in the fetus until mid-pregnancy. High quality research on lower animals is included if it helps to clarify the human situation. Studies progressing to birth and later are published if they have a direct bearing on events in the earlier stages of pregnancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信