Evaluation of the effects of maintaining a moderate humidity (50–60%) and increased air movement on litter moisture and footpad health in a commercial broiler house
IF 1.6 3区 农林科学Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
{"title":"Evaluation of the effects of maintaining a moderate humidity (50–60%) and increased air movement on litter moisture and footpad health in a commercial broiler house","authors":"C.T. Mou, M. Czarick III, B.D. Fairchild","doi":"10.1016/j.japr.2024.100476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>High litter moisture (>25%) strongly correlates with higher ammonia and increased footpad lesions. Although there are methods to help reduce the occurrence of high litter moisture, such as ventilation and proper drinker management, these methods need to evolve due to increasing consumer demands and more stringent animal welfare guidelines. A potentially cost-effective method may be ventilating houses to maintain a moderate RH level (60% or lower) and increasing the amount of air movement (150 ft/min) over the litter surface through circulation fans. This field study examined the possible effects of this combination on litter moisture and footpad health. The combination (TRT) had the greatest impact during the first 3 wk of a flock. The mean litter moisture was below 25% during this period in TRT houses. While litter moisture in the control (<strong>CTL</strong>) houses (no circulation fans- same RH) was 30% or greater. During the first 21 d, in 3 out of the 4 study flocks, less than 10% of birds had signs of lesions in the TRT house compared to up to 29% of birds in the CTL house. At the end of the flock, birds in the CTL house had, on average, a 23% higher rate of severe lesions than birds in the TRT house. These findings suggest moderate RH and supplemental air movement over the litter surface (150 ft/min) can benefit litter moisture control and footpad health.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Poultry Research","volume":"34 1","pages":"Article 100476"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Poultry Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056617124000746","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
High litter moisture (>25%) strongly correlates with higher ammonia and increased footpad lesions. Although there are methods to help reduce the occurrence of high litter moisture, such as ventilation and proper drinker management, these methods need to evolve due to increasing consumer demands and more stringent animal welfare guidelines. A potentially cost-effective method may be ventilating houses to maintain a moderate RH level (60% or lower) and increasing the amount of air movement (150 ft/min) over the litter surface through circulation fans. This field study examined the possible effects of this combination on litter moisture and footpad health. The combination (TRT) had the greatest impact during the first 3 wk of a flock. The mean litter moisture was below 25% during this period in TRT houses. While litter moisture in the control (CTL) houses (no circulation fans- same RH) was 30% or greater. During the first 21 d, in 3 out of the 4 study flocks, less than 10% of birds had signs of lesions in the TRT house compared to up to 29% of birds in the CTL house. At the end of the flock, birds in the CTL house had, on average, a 23% higher rate of severe lesions than birds in the TRT house. These findings suggest moderate RH and supplemental air movement over the litter surface (150 ft/min) can benefit litter moisture control and footpad health.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Applied Poultry Research (JAPR) publishes original research reports, field reports, and reviews on breeding, hatching, health and disease, layer management, meat bird processing and products, meat bird management, microbiology, food safety, nutrition, environment, sanitation, welfare, and economics. As of January 2020, JAPR will become an Open Access journal with no subscription charges, meaning authors who publish here can make their research immediately, permanently, and freely accessible worldwide while retaining copyright to their work. Papers submitted for publication after October 1, 2019 will be published as Open Access papers.
The readers of JAPR are in education, extension, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, veterinary medicine, management, production, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Nutritionists, breeder flock supervisors, production managers, microbiologists, laboratory personnel, food safety and sanitation managers, poultry processing managers, feed manufacturers, and egg producers use JAPR to keep up with current applied poultry research.