Bulk density and coarse fragment content of the French soil monitoring network for better assessment of changes of soil organic carbon stocks

IF 5.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
José-Luis Munera-Echeverri, Line Boulonne, Dominique Arrouays, Nicolas Saby, Nicolas Soler-Dominguez, Céline Ratié, Claudy Jolivet, Manuel P. Martin
{"title":"Bulk density and coarse fragment content of the French soil monitoring network for better assessment of changes of soil organic carbon stocks","authors":"José-Luis Munera-Echeverri,&nbsp;Line Boulonne,&nbsp;Dominique Arrouays,&nbsp;Nicolas Saby,&nbsp;Nicolas Soler-Dominguez,&nbsp;Céline Ratié,&nbsp;Claudy Jolivet,&nbsp;Manuel P. Martin","doi":"10.1016/j.catena.2024.108609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Bulk density (BD) and coarse fragments (CF) are often missing in soil monitoring networks. In the French Soil Quality Monitoring Network BD and CF have been measured in two campaigns in sites distributed in a grid over mainland France. The objective of this work is to evaluate i) how BD and CF have changed, ii) how volumetric methods and land use affect the observed trends, and iii) to simulate the impact of BD and CF changes on the estimations of changes of soil organic carbon stocks (SOCS). The results showed no significant change of (Δ) CF between campaigns in either the topsoil or subsoil, while there was a significant decrease of BD only in the topsoil (−3.1 ± 0.9 %). When methods were constant in both campaigns, BD decreased in croplands and grasslands topsoil and it did not change in forests. We could explain a rather low part of the ΔBD variance (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.21), mostly linked to the within-site variability of CF and to changes in some methodological aspects between campaigns. We simulated changes in topsoil SOCS, assuming SOC content constant over time; we found negative estimates that were the largest in soils with low CF content (−0.2 ± 0.06 % yr<sup>−1</sup> an<sup>-1</sup>) as well as differences between using site-specific average CF values over both campaigns and using site-specific values of each campaign [-0.17 ± 0.04 % yr<sup>−1</sup> vs −0.05 ± 0.06 % yr<sup>−1</sup>, respectively]. These differences were caused by rocky soils, and were not significant when using only sites with low CF content. Our work highlights some limitations in assessing BD changes using broad-scale soil monitoring networks. These findings have important consequences on the methods used to assess changes in SOCS and their uncertainties at broad-scale. They are timely and relevant given the current proposals to implement soil health monitoring at national, continental and global scale.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9801,"journal":{"name":"Catena","volume":"248 ","pages":"Article 108609"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catena","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0341816224008063","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bulk density (BD) and coarse fragments (CF) are often missing in soil monitoring networks. In the French Soil Quality Monitoring Network BD and CF have been measured in two campaigns in sites distributed in a grid over mainland France. The objective of this work is to evaluate i) how BD and CF have changed, ii) how volumetric methods and land use affect the observed trends, and iii) to simulate the impact of BD and CF changes on the estimations of changes of soil organic carbon stocks (SOCS). The results showed no significant change of (Δ) CF between campaigns in either the topsoil or subsoil, while there was a significant decrease of BD only in the topsoil (−3.1 ± 0.9 %). When methods were constant in both campaigns, BD decreased in croplands and grasslands topsoil and it did not change in forests. We could explain a rather low part of the ΔBD variance (R2 = 0.21), mostly linked to the within-site variability of CF and to changes in some methodological aspects between campaigns. We simulated changes in topsoil SOCS, assuming SOC content constant over time; we found negative estimates that were the largest in soils with low CF content (−0.2 ± 0.06 % yr−1 an-1) as well as differences between using site-specific average CF values over both campaigns and using site-specific values of each campaign [-0.17 ± 0.04 % yr−1 vs −0.05 ± 0.06 % yr−1, respectively]. These differences were caused by rocky soils, and were not significant when using only sites with low CF content. Our work highlights some limitations in assessing BD changes using broad-scale soil monitoring networks. These findings have important consequences on the methods used to assess changes in SOCS and their uncertainties at broad-scale. They are timely and relevant given the current proposals to implement soil health monitoring at national, continental and global scale.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Catena
Catena 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
9.70%
发文量
816
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Catena publishes papers describing original field and laboratory investigations and reviews on geoecology and landscape evolution with emphasis on interdisciplinary aspects of soil science, hydrology and geomorphology. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and foster better understanding of the physical environment, of evolutionary sequences that have resulted in past and current landscapes, and of the natural processes that are likely to determine the fate of our terrestrial environment. Papers within any one of the above topics are welcome provided they are of sufficiently wide interest and relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信