Patricia Puente , Balaji Rajagopalan , Laura E. Condon
{"title":"Understanding the temporal variability and predictability of streamflow signatures in the Colorado River Basin","authors":"Patricia Puente , Balaji Rajagopalan , Laura E. Condon","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>It is well established that streamflow regimes evolve over decadal time scales (i.e., low frequency) leading to long term shifts in distributions. Similar low frequency variations have also been documented in streamflow predictability. Here we explore connections between streamflow distribution attributes and predictability regimes in the Upper Colorado River Basin. We employ nonlinear dynamical time series analysis methods on streamflow timeseries covering the period 762 – 2019 for six locations in the basin. First, a wavelet spectral analysis is performed to obtain the quasi-periodic ‘signal’ of the streamflow. The wavelet analysis also provides the temporal variability of the variance of the signal time series. The signal time series is embedded in a <span><math><mi>D</mi></math></span>-dimensional space with appropriate lag to reconstruct the phase space of the dynamics – i.e. the attractor. Overall predictability is assessed by quantifying the average divergence trajectories in the phase space using Global Lyapunov Exponents and the temporal variability of predictability via the Local Lyapunov Exponents. Results show clear oscillations in streamflow predictability with periods of both high and low predictability occurring throughout the study period at all gauges. Comparing predictability timeseries across the stream gauges we find that general consistency in high and low predictability periods, although they do not perfectly align temporally. In general, higher (lower) predictability periods are characterized by lower (higher) streamflow variance. While there is not a clear relationship between streamflow magnitude and predictability in general, modern high predictability epochs are characterized by a slightly greater likelihood of dry years and lower likelihood of wet years than other epochs. These findings indicate the potential for statistically significant differences in streamflow signatures between high and low predictability periods. Exploring these fundings further with potential connections to large-scale climate can be helpful in exploiting them for skillful short and medium term flow projections.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"648 ","pages":"Article 132386"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169424017827","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
It is well established that streamflow regimes evolve over decadal time scales (i.e., low frequency) leading to long term shifts in distributions. Similar low frequency variations have also been documented in streamflow predictability. Here we explore connections between streamflow distribution attributes and predictability regimes in the Upper Colorado River Basin. We employ nonlinear dynamical time series analysis methods on streamflow timeseries covering the period 762 – 2019 for six locations in the basin. First, a wavelet spectral analysis is performed to obtain the quasi-periodic ‘signal’ of the streamflow. The wavelet analysis also provides the temporal variability of the variance of the signal time series. The signal time series is embedded in a -dimensional space with appropriate lag to reconstruct the phase space of the dynamics – i.e. the attractor. Overall predictability is assessed by quantifying the average divergence trajectories in the phase space using Global Lyapunov Exponents and the temporal variability of predictability via the Local Lyapunov Exponents. Results show clear oscillations in streamflow predictability with periods of both high and low predictability occurring throughout the study period at all gauges. Comparing predictability timeseries across the stream gauges we find that general consistency in high and low predictability periods, although they do not perfectly align temporally. In general, higher (lower) predictability periods are characterized by lower (higher) streamflow variance. While there is not a clear relationship between streamflow magnitude and predictability in general, modern high predictability epochs are characterized by a slightly greater likelihood of dry years and lower likelihood of wet years than other epochs. These findings indicate the potential for statistically significant differences in streamflow signatures between high and low predictability periods. Exploring these fundings further with potential connections to large-scale climate can be helpful in exploiting them for skillful short and medium term flow projections.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.