Predictive modeling of river blockage severity from debris flows: Integrating statistical and machine learning approaches with insights from Sichuan Province, China

IF 5.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Wei Zhou, Yaping Zhou, Renwen Liu, Huaqiang Yin, Haowen Nie
{"title":"Predictive modeling of river blockage severity from debris flows: Integrating statistical and machine learning approaches with insights from Sichuan Province, China","authors":"Wei Zhou,&nbsp;Yaping Zhou,&nbsp;Renwen Liu,&nbsp;Huaqiang Yin,&nbsp;Haowen Nie","doi":"10.1016/j.catena.2024.108576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>River blockages caused by debris flows pose serious threats to the environment and infrastructure. This study introduces the river blockage index (<em>RBI</em>) as a key measure of river blockage severity. We collected data from 60 debris flow events to build a comprehensive dataset. To enhance model robustness and accuracy, we optimized variable selection using multicollinearity analysis and the Akaike information criterion (<em>AIC</em>). Four statistical models were developed, including multiple linear, logarithmic, power, and exponential regressions. We also constructed models based on machine learning algorithms, including random forests and gradient boosting decision trees, and tested them using 5-fold cross-validation. After confirming that the training dataset met linear statistical assumptions, we built robust regression models. We tested the significance of the regression equations and coefficients using <em>F</em>-tests and <em>t</em>-tests. Hyperparameters of the machine learning algorithms were optimized through Bayesian methods. Model performance was evaluated using metrics such as <em>R</em><sup>2</sup>, adjusted <em>R</em><sup>2</sup>, mean absolute error (<em>MAE</em>), mean relative error (<em>MRE</em>), and root mean square error (<em>RMSE</em>). Results show that the most important factors influencing <em>RBI</em> are catchment area (<em>A</em>) and the discharge ratio between the debris flow and the main river (<em>Q</em>). Among the statistical models, the logarithmic and power models performed best due to their simplicity and efficiency. The random forest model demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy and stability overall. By combining statistical methods with machine learning, we improved prediction accuracy and provided practical guidance for disaster prevention strategies. This approach overcomes the limitations of numerical simulations and experimental studies, offering a more flexible and efficient method for <em>RBI</em> prediction. Future work will extend these findings to other geological settings to further enhance model adaptability and performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9801,"journal":{"name":"Catena","volume":"248 ","pages":"Article 108576"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catena","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0341816224007732","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

River blockages caused by debris flows pose serious threats to the environment and infrastructure. This study introduces the river blockage index (RBI) as a key measure of river blockage severity. We collected data from 60 debris flow events to build a comprehensive dataset. To enhance model robustness and accuracy, we optimized variable selection using multicollinearity analysis and the Akaike information criterion (AIC). Four statistical models were developed, including multiple linear, logarithmic, power, and exponential regressions. We also constructed models based on machine learning algorithms, including random forests and gradient boosting decision trees, and tested them using 5-fold cross-validation. After confirming that the training dataset met linear statistical assumptions, we built robust regression models. We tested the significance of the regression equations and coefficients using F-tests and t-tests. Hyperparameters of the machine learning algorithms were optimized through Bayesian methods. Model performance was evaluated using metrics such as R2, adjusted R2, mean absolute error (MAE), mean relative error (MRE), and root mean square error (RMSE). Results show that the most important factors influencing RBI are catchment area (A) and the discharge ratio between the debris flow and the main river (Q). Among the statistical models, the logarithmic and power models performed best due to their simplicity and efficiency. The random forest model demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy and stability overall. By combining statistical methods with machine learning, we improved prediction accuracy and provided practical guidance for disaster prevention strategies. This approach overcomes the limitations of numerical simulations and experimental studies, offering a more flexible and efficient method for RBI prediction. Future work will extend these findings to other geological settings to further enhance model adaptability and performance.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Catena
Catena 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
9.70%
发文量
816
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Catena publishes papers describing original field and laboratory investigations and reviews on geoecology and landscape evolution with emphasis on interdisciplinary aspects of soil science, hydrology and geomorphology. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and foster better understanding of the physical environment, of evolutionary sequences that have resulted in past and current landscapes, and of the natural processes that are likely to determine the fate of our terrestrial environment. Papers within any one of the above topics are welcome provided they are of sufficiently wide interest and relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信