Mowing in place of conventional grazing increased soil organic carbon stability and altered depth-dependent protection mechanisms

IF 5.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Bin Wei , Yuqi Wei , Hao Zhang , Tongtian Guo , Ruihuan Zhang , Yingjun Zhang , Nan Liu
{"title":"Mowing in place of conventional grazing increased soil organic carbon stability and altered depth-dependent protection mechanisms","authors":"Bin Wei ,&nbsp;Yuqi Wei ,&nbsp;Hao Zhang ,&nbsp;Tongtian Guo ,&nbsp;Ruihuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Yingjun Zhang ,&nbsp;Nan Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.catena.2024.108629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Conventional grazing with high grazing pressure can decrease soil organic carbon (SOC) stability by disrupting its protective mechanisms, eliciting soil depth-dependent responses. Grazing exclusion for hay-making by mowing is usually adopted to restore grassland. However, there is still a lack of systematic evaluation of SOC stability and its impact factors in different soil layers when mowing replaces conventional grazing. Here, based on an investigation of 15 paired sites from mowing vs. conventional grazing in a temperate grassland of northeast China, we found that mowing increased mean weight diameter of soil aggregates (MWD, 5.14 %), Fe/Al associated organic carbon (Fe/Al-OC, 12.20 %), and SOC stability (11.46 %) at topmost soil layer (0–10 cm) but only increased MWD (8.50 %) at subsurface soil (10–30 cm). Mowing increased root biomass of plant variables, soil bulk density and pH of soil properties, and microbial biomass carbon (MBC) of microbial properties at the topmost layer, collectively contributing to SOC protection. However, the reduction in soil nitrate nitrogen and increasing MBC induced by mowing drove the subsurface SOC protection. The protection mechanism for SOC stability shifted from a single physical protection dominance in mowing areas to joint physical and mineral protection in conventional grazing grasslands at the topmost depth. In contrast, subsurface SOC stability was consistently governed by mineral protection regardless of grazing. Our results imply that although grassland ecosystems can initiate more protection mechanisms to cope with disturbances, mowing induced the increase of physical and mineral protection resulting from the substantial promotion in plant C input quantity and microbial biomass, combined with alteration in soil properties, finally stabilized topmost SOC. The limited impact of management practices on the subsurface SOC stability indicates that the interaction of subsurface soil and microbial properties with SOC protection should be fully considered to forecast soil C dynamics and its resistance to disturbance accurately.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9801,"journal":{"name":"Catena","volume":"248 ","pages":"Article 108629"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catena","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0341816224008269","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conventional grazing with high grazing pressure can decrease soil organic carbon (SOC) stability by disrupting its protective mechanisms, eliciting soil depth-dependent responses. Grazing exclusion for hay-making by mowing is usually adopted to restore grassland. However, there is still a lack of systematic evaluation of SOC stability and its impact factors in different soil layers when mowing replaces conventional grazing. Here, based on an investigation of 15 paired sites from mowing vs. conventional grazing in a temperate grassland of northeast China, we found that mowing increased mean weight diameter of soil aggregates (MWD, 5.14 %), Fe/Al associated organic carbon (Fe/Al-OC, 12.20 %), and SOC stability (11.46 %) at topmost soil layer (0–10 cm) but only increased MWD (8.50 %) at subsurface soil (10–30 cm). Mowing increased root biomass of plant variables, soil bulk density and pH of soil properties, and microbial biomass carbon (MBC) of microbial properties at the topmost layer, collectively contributing to SOC protection. However, the reduction in soil nitrate nitrogen and increasing MBC induced by mowing drove the subsurface SOC protection. The protection mechanism for SOC stability shifted from a single physical protection dominance in mowing areas to joint physical and mineral protection in conventional grazing grasslands at the topmost depth. In contrast, subsurface SOC stability was consistently governed by mineral protection regardless of grazing. Our results imply that although grassland ecosystems can initiate more protection mechanisms to cope with disturbances, mowing induced the increase of physical and mineral protection resulting from the substantial promotion in plant C input quantity and microbial biomass, combined with alteration in soil properties, finally stabilized topmost SOC. The limited impact of management practices on the subsurface SOC stability indicates that the interaction of subsurface soil and microbial properties with SOC protection should be fully considered to forecast soil C dynamics and its resistance to disturbance accurately.
以割草代替传统放牧增加了土壤有机碳的稳定性,改变了依赖深度的保护机制
高放牧压力下的常规放牧会破坏土壤有机碳(SOC)的保护机制,引起土壤深度依赖性响应,从而降低土壤有机碳(SOC)稳定性。为了恢复草原,通常采用禁牧制草的方法。然而,目前还缺乏对刈割替代放牧时不同土层有机碳稳定性及其影响因子的系统评价。通过对东北温带草地15个刈割与常规放牧样地的对比研究,我们发现刈割增加了表层(0 ~ 10 cm)土壤团聚体的平均重径(MWD, 5.14%)、Fe/Al伴生有机碳(Fe/Al- oc, 12.20%)和有机碳稳定性(11.46%),但只增加了表层(10 ~ 30 cm)土壤的MWD(8.50%)。刈割增加了植物根系生物量、土壤容重和土壤性质pH值以及最表层微生物性质微生物生物量碳(MBC),共同促进了有机碳的保护。而刈割引起的土壤硝态氮的减少和MBC的增加则促进了土壤有机碳的保护。土壤有机碳稳定性的保护机制由刈割区单一的物理保护为主向常规放牧草地最深层的物理和矿物联合保护转变。相比之下,地下有机碳稳定性始终受矿物保护的支配,而不受放牧的影响。研究结果表明,尽管草地生态系统可以启动更多的保护机制来应对干扰,但刈割导致植物C输入量和微生物量的大幅增加,加上土壤性质的改变,导致了物理和矿物保护的增加,最终稳定了顶层有机碳。管理措施对地下有机碳稳定性的影响有限,表明应充分考虑地下土壤和微生物特性与有机碳保护的相互作用,以准确预测土壤碳动态及其对干扰的抵抗力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Catena
Catena 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
9.70%
发文量
816
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Catena publishes papers describing original field and laboratory investigations and reviews on geoecology and landscape evolution with emphasis on interdisciplinary aspects of soil science, hydrology and geomorphology. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and foster better understanding of the physical environment, of evolutionary sequences that have resulted in past and current landscapes, and of the natural processes that are likely to determine the fate of our terrestrial environment. Papers within any one of the above topics are welcome provided they are of sufficiently wide interest and relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信