The Training Intensity Distribution of Marathon Runners Across Performance Levels

IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Daniel Muniz-Pumares, Ben Hunter, Samuel Meyler, Ed Maunder, Barry Smyth
{"title":"The Training Intensity Distribution of Marathon Runners Across Performance Levels","authors":"Daniel Muniz-Pumares, Ben Hunter, Samuel Meyler, Ed Maunder, Barry Smyth","doi":"10.1007/s40279-024-02137-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>The training characteristics and training intensity distribution (TID) of elite athletes have been extensively studied, but a comprehensive analysis of the TID across runners from different performance levels is lacking.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Training sessions from the 16 weeks preceding 151,813 marathons completed by 119,452 runners were analysed. The TID was quantified using a three-zone approach (Z1, Z2 and Z3), where critical speed defined the boundary between Z2 and Z3, and the transition between Z1 and Z2 was assumed to occur at 82.3% of critical speed. Training characteristics and TID were reported based on marathon finish time.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Training volume across all runners was 45.1 ± 26.4 km·week<sup>−1</sup>, but the fastest runners within the dataset (marathon time 120–150 min) accumulated &gt; three times more volume than slower runners. The amount of training time completed in Z2 and Z3 running remained relatively stable across performance levels, but the proportion of Z1 was higher in progressively faster groups. The most common TID approach was pyramidal, adopted by &gt; 80% of runners with the fastest marathon times. There were strong, negative correlations (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> ≥ 0.90) between marathon time and markers of training volume, and the proportion of training volume completed in Z1. However, the proportions of training completed in Z2 and Z3 were correlated (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> ≥ 0.85) with slower marathon times.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>The fastest runners in this dataset featured large training volumes, achieved primarily by increasing training volume in Z1. Marathon runners adopted a pyramidal TID approach, and the prevalence of pyramidal TID increased in the fastest runners.</p>","PeriodicalId":21969,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-024-02137-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The training characteristics and training intensity distribution (TID) of elite athletes have been extensively studied, but a comprehensive analysis of the TID across runners from different performance levels is lacking.

Methods

Training sessions from the 16 weeks preceding 151,813 marathons completed by 119,452 runners were analysed. The TID was quantified using a three-zone approach (Z1, Z2 and Z3), where critical speed defined the boundary between Z2 and Z3, and the transition between Z1 and Z2 was assumed to occur at 82.3% of critical speed. Training characteristics and TID were reported based on marathon finish time.

Results

Training volume across all runners was 45.1 ± 26.4 km·week−1, but the fastest runners within the dataset (marathon time 120–150 min) accumulated > three times more volume than slower runners. The amount of training time completed in Z2 and Z3 running remained relatively stable across performance levels, but the proportion of Z1 was higher in progressively faster groups. The most common TID approach was pyramidal, adopted by > 80% of runners with the fastest marathon times. There were strong, negative correlations (p < 0.01, R2 ≥ 0.90) between marathon time and markers of training volume, and the proportion of training volume completed in Z1. However, the proportions of training completed in Z2 and Z3 were correlated (p < 0.01, R2 ≥ 0.85) with slower marathon times.

Conclusion

The fastest runners in this dataset featured large training volumes, achieved primarily by increasing training volume in Z1. Marathon runners adopted a pyramidal TID approach, and the prevalence of pyramidal TID increased in the fastest runners.

马拉松运动员在不同表现水平上的训练强度分布
优秀运动员的训练特征和训练强度分布(TID)已被广泛研究,但缺乏对不同水平跑者训练强度分布的综合分析。方法分析了119,452名跑步者完成151,813场马拉松比赛前16周的训练时间。TID采用三区方法(Z1, Z2和Z3)进行量化,其中临界速度定义了Z2和Z3之间的边界,并且假设Z1和Z2之间的过渡发生在临界速度的82.3%。以马拉松跑完时间为基础,报告训练特征和TID。结果所有跑步者的训练量为45.1±26.4 km·week - 1,但数据集中跑得最快的人(马拉松时间120-150分钟)的累积量是跑得较慢的人的3倍。Z2和Z3跑步完成的训练时间在不同的表现水平上保持相对稳定,但Z1的比例在越来越快的组中更高。最常见的TID方法是金字塔式的,80%马拉松成绩最快的跑步者都采用了这种方法。马拉松时间与训练量指标、Z1中完成的训练量比例呈显著负相关(p < 0.01, R2≥0.90)。然而,在Z2和Z3完成的训练比例与较慢的马拉松成绩相关(p < 0.01, R2≥0.85)。该数据集中跑得最快的运动员训练量很大,主要通过增加Z1的训练量来实现。马拉松运动员采用金字塔型TID方法,跑得最快的运动员中金字塔型TID患病率增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sports Medicine
Sports Medicine 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
165
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sports Medicine focuses on providing definitive and comprehensive review articles that interpret and evaluate current literature, aiming to offer insights into research findings in the sports medicine and exercise field. The journal covers major topics such as sports medicine and sports science, medical syndromes associated with sport and exercise, clinical medicine's role in injury prevention and treatment, exercise for rehabilitation and health, and the application of physiological and biomechanical principles to specific sports. Types of Articles: Review Articles: Definitive and comprehensive reviews that interpret and evaluate current literature to provide rationale for and application of research findings. Leading/Current Opinion Articles: Overviews of contentious or emerging issues in the field. Original Research Articles: High-quality research articles. Enhanced Features: Additional features like slide sets, videos, and animations aimed at increasing the visibility, readership, and educational value of the journal's content. Plain Language Summaries: Summaries accompanying articles to assist readers in understanding important medical advances. Peer Review Process: All manuscripts undergo peer review by international experts to ensure quality and rigor. The journal also welcomes Letters to the Editor, which will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信