Resource-Efficient Solvent Utilization: Solvent Selection Criteria Based on Solvent Swap Characteristics

IF 7.1 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Stephanie Peper, Andrés González de Castilla, Thomas Kochenburger, Julius Hillenbrand, Jörg Gries, Dieter Förtsch
{"title":"Resource-Efficient Solvent Utilization: Solvent Selection Criteria Based on Solvent Swap Characteristics","authors":"Stephanie Peper, Andrés González de Castilla, Thomas Kochenburger, Julius Hillenbrand, Jörg Gries, Dieter Förtsch","doi":"10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c05521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several solvent selection guides were developed and published in the past, which take health, safety, and environmental aspects into account. Despite their valuable contribution to more sustainable solvent use in chemical manufacturing, the evaluations of these guides are essentially based on the characteristics of pure solvents. However, since also mixtures of solvents are often handled in a multistep manufacturing process, such a pure solvent evaluation often falls short since it does not capture important process-intrinsic aspects. To improve the preselection of solvents, we provide in this contribution new supplemental process-related indicators which quantify the effort arising from a solvent swap procedure considering the separability of mixtures of solvents. These new separation feasibility indicators (SFIs) are based on calculations which not only account for real (nonideal) thermodynamic properties of binary solvent mixtures but also include three key results of a simulated “standard” solvent swap procedure: the number of solvent swap steps needed to achieve the required purity, the specific mass of lost swap solvent, and the required specific energy of the solvent swap procedure. The calculations were carried out for 57 solvents that are commonly used in the pharmaceutical industry or currently discussed as “green solvents” in recent publications. These 57 solvents yield 1596 binary solvent mixtures and 3192 possible solvent swap combinations. We demonstrate with specific examples that simple evaluations based on boiling point comparisons or relative volatilities can be misleading in the preselection of solvents. The classification of solvent combinations based on the calculated SFIs aids in the design of a resource-efficient manufacturing process in terms of solvent and energy consumption already at an early stage of process development, supporting a “first-time-right” approach with limited additional effort.","PeriodicalId":25,"journal":{"name":"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering","volume":"81 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c05521","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several solvent selection guides were developed and published in the past, which take health, safety, and environmental aspects into account. Despite their valuable contribution to more sustainable solvent use in chemical manufacturing, the evaluations of these guides are essentially based on the characteristics of pure solvents. However, since also mixtures of solvents are often handled in a multistep manufacturing process, such a pure solvent evaluation often falls short since it does not capture important process-intrinsic aspects. To improve the preselection of solvents, we provide in this contribution new supplemental process-related indicators which quantify the effort arising from a solvent swap procedure considering the separability of mixtures of solvents. These new separation feasibility indicators (SFIs) are based on calculations which not only account for real (nonideal) thermodynamic properties of binary solvent mixtures but also include three key results of a simulated “standard” solvent swap procedure: the number of solvent swap steps needed to achieve the required purity, the specific mass of lost swap solvent, and the required specific energy of the solvent swap procedure. The calculations were carried out for 57 solvents that are commonly used in the pharmaceutical industry or currently discussed as “green solvents” in recent publications. These 57 solvents yield 1596 binary solvent mixtures and 3192 possible solvent swap combinations. We demonstrate with specific examples that simple evaluations based on boiling point comparisons or relative volatilities can be misleading in the preselection of solvents. The classification of solvent combinations based on the calculated SFIs aids in the design of a resource-efficient manufacturing process in terms of solvent and energy consumption already at an early stage of process development, supporting a “first-time-right” approach with limited additional effort.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1470
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering is a prestigious weekly peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the American Chemical Society. Dedicated to advancing the principles of green chemistry and green engineering, it covers a wide array of research topics including green chemistry, green engineering, biomass, alternative energy, and life cycle assessment. The journal welcomes submissions in various formats, including Letters, Articles, Features, and Perspectives (Reviews), that address the challenges of sustainability in the chemical enterprise and contribute to the advancement of sustainable practices. Join us in shaping the future of sustainable chemistry and engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信