Comparative Effectiveness of Buprenorphine/Naloxone and Methadone on Methamphetamine/Amphetamine Use Among People with Opioid Use Disorder in Canada.

Jenna Langlois, Nadia Fairbairn, Didier Jutras-Aswad, Bernard Le Foll, Keith Ahamad, Ron Lim, M Eugenia Socías
{"title":"Comparative Effectiveness of Buprenorphine/Naloxone and Methadone on Methamphetamine/Amphetamine Use Among People with Opioid Use Disorder in Canada.","authors":"Jenna Langlois, Nadia Fairbairn, Didier Jutras-Aswad, Bernard Le Foll, Keith Ahamad, Ron Lim, M Eugenia Socías","doi":"10.1177/29767342241298044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It has been suggested that opioid agonist therapy (OAT) may have a secondary benefit of reducing methamphetamine/amphetamine use. However, current evidence is limited and conflicting, and little is known on the impacts of different OATs on methamphetamine/amphetamine use. The aim of this study was to examine the comparative effectiveness of buprenorphine/naloxone and methadone on methamphetamine/amphetamine use among individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) initiating OAT in Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data for this study were derived from a 24-week pan-Canadian pragmatic trial conducted between 2017 and 2020 comparing supervised methadone versus flexible take-home dosing buprenorphine/naloxone models of care among OUD. Generalized linear mixed models were used to evaluate the independent effect of treatment (ie, methadone or buprenorphine/naloxone) and time in treatment (ie, week 2 through 24, continuous) on methamphetamine/amphetamine use (measured by urine drug test and self-report using Timeline Follow-Back).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample included 210 participants that initiated OAT, of which 130 (61.9%) were using methamphetamine/amphetamine at baseline. In multivariable analysis, neither treatment nor time in treatment were significantly associated with the odds of methamphetamine/amphetamine use (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.34-1.08, <i>P</i> = .092; and AOR = 0.73, CI = 0.40-1.28, <i>P</i> = .283, respectively). No interaction between treatment and time in treatment was observed for methamphetamine/amphetamine use (<i>P</i> = .367).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Methamphetamine/amphetamine use was common among this sample of people with OUD initiating OAT in Canada. Over the 24-week study period, buprenorphine/naloxone and methadone were not associated with a quantifiable change in methamphetamine/amphetamine use among this sample population. The observation of less methamphetamine/amphetamine use in the buprenorphine/naloxone arm warrants further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":" ","pages":"29767342241298044"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance use & addiction journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342241298044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It has been suggested that opioid agonist therapy (OAT) may have a secondary benefit of reducing methamphetamine/amphetamine use. However, current evidence is limited and conflicting, and little is known on the impacts of different OATs on methamphetamine/amphetamine use. The aim of this study was to examine the comparative effectiveness of buprenorphine/naloxone and methadone on methamphetamine/amphetamine use among individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) initiating OAT in Canada.

Methods: Data for this study were derived from a 24-week pan-Canadian pragmatic trial conducted between 2017 and 2020 comparing supervised methadone versus flexible take-home dosing buprenorphine/naloxone models of care among OUD. Generalized linear mixed models were used to evaluate the independent effect of treatment (ie, methadone or buprenorphine/naloxone) and time in treatment (ie, week 2 through 24, continuous) on methamphetamine/amphetamine use (measured by urine drug test and self-report using Timeline Follow-Back).

Results: The sample included 210 participants that initiated OAT, of which 130 (61.9%) were using methamphetamine/amphetamine at baseline. In multivariable analysis, neither treatment nor time in treatment were significantly associated with the odds of methamphetamine/amphetamine use (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.34-1.08, P = .092; and AOR = 0.73, CI = 0.40-1.28, P = .283, respectively). No interaction between treatment and time in treatment was observed for methamphetamine/amphetamine use (P = .367).

Conclusion: Methamphetamine/amphetamine use was common among this sample of people with OUD initiating OAT in Canada. Over the 24-week study period, buprenorphine/naloxone and methadone were not associated with a quantifiable change in methamphetamine/amphetamine use among this sample population. The observation of less methamphetamine/amphetamine use in the buprenorphine/naloxone arm warrants further research.

丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮和美沙酮对加拿大阿片类药物使用障碍患者甲基苯丙胺/安非他明使用的比较效果
背景:有研究表明,阿片激动剂治疗(OAT)可能具有减少甲基苯丙胺/安非他明使用的次要益处。然而,目前的证据是有限和相互矛盾的,并且对不同燕麦对甲基苯丙胺/安非他明使用的影响知之甚少。本研究的目的是检查丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮和美沙酮对加拿大阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)患者启动OAT的甲基苯丙胺/安非他明使用的比较有效性。方法:本研究的数据来自于2017年至2020年期间进行的一项为期24周的泛加拿大实用试验,比较了OUD患者的监督美沙酮与灵活的带回家剂量丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮治疗模式。采用广义线性混合模型来评估治疗(即美沙酮或丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮)和治疗时间(即第2周至第24周,连续)对甲基苯丙胺/安非他明使用的独立影响(通过尿药检和使用时间线随访- back的自我报告来测量)。结果:样本包括210名开始OAT的参与者,其中130名(61.9%)在基线时使用甲基苯丙胺/安非他命。在多变量分析中,治疗和治疗时间与甲基苯丙胺/安非他明使用的几率均无显著相关(校正优势比[AOR] = 0.61, 95%可信区间[CI] = 0.34-1.08, P = 0.092;AOR = 0.73, CI = 0.40 ~ 1.28, P =。283年,分别)。在甲基苯丙胺/安非他明的使用中,治疗与治疗时间之间没有相互作用(P = .367)。结论:甲基苯丙胺/安非他明的使用在加拿大的OUD患者开始OAT的样本中很常见。在24周的研究期间,丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮和美沙酮与样本人群中甲基苯丙胺/安非他明使用的可量化变化无关。丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮组中甲基苯丙胺/安非他明使用较少的观察值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信