Robotization in microbiology.

Abderrazak Saddari, Said Ezrari, Elmostapha Benaissa, Yassine Ben Lahlou, Mostafa Elouennass, Adil Maleb
{"title":"Robotization in microbiology.","authors":"Abderrazak Saddari, Said Ezrari, Elmostapha Benaissa, Yassine Ben Lahlou, Mostafa Elouennass, Adil Maleb","doi":"10.1684/abc.2024.1922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since 1960, Williams and Trotman had dreamed of automating all technical manipulations in bacteriology. However, this switch to automation took several decades to realize. The high cost of instruments and the attachment to classical bacteriology were the main obstacles. Automation began with blood culture incubators, and paved the way for automation in other areas of bacteriology, notably cytology, culture, identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing. Medical laboratories have been quick to recognize the efficiency of these systems and their many advantages. The reduction in turnaround times for bacteriological examinations is one of the changes that have revolutionized laboratory practice. In addition, sensitivity, safety, traceability and quality are more assured with automation. The second revolution is the integration of artificial intelligence into the processing and interpretation of bacteriological analyses. We are currently witnessing the total automation of laboratories and a reduction in human intervention. In this article, we have attempted to address all aspects of bacteriology affected by automation, and the impact of this change on current laboratory practice and quality of healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":93870,"journal":{"name":"Annales de biologie clinique","volume":"82 5","pages":"489-499"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales de biologie clinique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1684/abc.2024.1922","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since 1960, Williams and Trotman had dreamed of automating all technical manipulations in bacteriology. However, this switch to automation took several decades to realize. The high cost of instruments and the attachment to classical bacteriology were the main obstacles. Automation began with blood culture incubators, and paved the way for automation in other areas of bacteriology, notably cytology, culture, identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing. Medical laboratories have been quick to recognize the efficiency of these systems and their many advantages. The reduction in turnaround times for bacteriological examinations is one of the changes that have revolutionized laboratory practice. In addition, sensitivity, safety, traceability and quality are more assured with automation. The second revolution is the integration of artificial intelligence into the processing and interpretation of bacteriological analyses. We are currently witnessing the total automation of laboratories and a reduction in human intervention. In this article, we have attempted to address all aspects of bacteriology affected by automation, and the impact of this change on current laboratory practice and quality of healthcare.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信