Beste Melek Atasoy, Gülşah Özden, Leyla Cinel, Dilek Gül, Ali Cemal Yumuşakhuylu, Zeynep Akdeniz Doğan
{"title":"The impact of worst patterns of invasion on survival outcomes in oral cavity cancer: implications for adjuvant therapy and prognostic stratification.","authors":"Beste Melek Atasoy, Gülşah Özden, Leyla Cinel, Dilek Gül, Ali Cemal Yumuşakhuylu, Zeynep Akdeniz Doğan","doi":"10.1007/s12094-024-03788-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine the impact of the worst patterns of invasion (WPOI) on survival outcomes and possible implications for adjuvant treatment decisions in squamous cell oral cavity cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The loco-regional progression-free survival (LRPFS) and the distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were calculated for 162 patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses were done according to prognostic predictors of stage (early/T1-2 or N0; locally advanced /T3-4 or N +), grade, depth of invasion, WPOI, perineural (PNI), and lymphovascular (LVI) invasion and margin status. WPOI-V, PNI, and LVI were also analyzed for their positive status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up was 46 months (3-77 months). A total of 32 events, as loco-regional (n = 16), systemic progression (n = 14), and second primary lung cancer (n = 2) were observed. The presence of locally advanced disease, PNI or LVI, and WPOI-V were significantly worse prognostic factors for LRFS and DMFS. The 5-year LRPFS (74% vs. 92.8%, p = 0.001) and DMFS (74% vs. 94%, p < 0.0001) were significantly worse in patients with WPOI-V present. In multivariate analysis, WPOI-V patients had a worse prognosis for loco-regional relapse (p = 0.037) in early-stage cancer. There were no triple-positive patients in the early-stage group. LRRFS (90.4% vs. 59.7%, p < 0.0001) and DMFS (97% vs. 42.9%, p = 0.013) were significantly better in triple-negative patients compared to triple-positive patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>WPOI-V indicates a poor prognosis for locoregional progression and distant metastasis. Survival outcomes are significantly worse in triple-positive patients. These results need further evidence for adjuvant radiotherapy for early and systemic therapy for triple-positive locally advanced-stage patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50685,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"2651-2657"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-024-03788-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To examine the impact of the worst patterns of invasion (WPOI) on survival outcomes and possible implications for adjuvant treatment decisions in squamous cell oral cavity cancer patients.
Methods: The loco-regional progression-free survival (LRPFS) and the distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were calculated for 162 patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses were done according to prognostic predictors of stage (early/T1-2 or N0; locally advanced /T3-4 or N +), grade, depth of invasion, WPOI, perineural (PNI), and lymphovascular (LVI) invasion and margin status. WPOI-V, PNI, and LVI were also analyzed for their positive status.
Results: The median follow-up was 46 months (3-77 months). A total of 32 events, as loco-regional (n = 16), systemic progression (n = 14), and second primary lung cancer (n = 2) were observed. The presence of locally advanced disease, PNI or LVI, and WPOI-V were significantly worse prognostic factors for LRFS and DMFS. The 5-year LRPFS (74% vs. 92.8%, p = 0.001) and DMFS (74% vs. 94%, p < 0.0001) were significantly worse in patients with WPOI-V present. In multivariate analysis, WPOI-V patients had a worse prognosis for loco-regional relapse (p = 0.037) in early-stage cancer. There were no triple-positive patients in the early-stage group. LRRFS (90.4% vs. 59.7%, p < 0.0001) and DMFS (97% vs. 42.9%, p = 0.013) were significantly better in triple-negative patients compared to triple-positive patients.
Conclusion: WPOI-V indicates a poor prognosis for locoregional progression and distant metastasis. Survival outcomes are significantly worse in triple-positive patients. These results need further evidence for adjuvant radiotherapy for early and systemic therapy for triple-positive locally advanced-stage patients.
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Translational Oncology is an international journal devoted to fostering interaction between experimental and clinical oncology. It covers all aspects of research on cancer, from the more basic discoveries dealing with both cell and molecular biology of tumour cells, to the most advanced clinical assays of conventional and new drugs. In addition, the journal has a strong commitment to facilitating the transfer of knowledge from the basic laboratory to the clinical practice, with the publication of educational series devoted to closing the gap between molecular and clinical oncologists. Molecular biology of tumours, identification of new targets for cancer therapy, and new technologies for research and treatment of cancer are the major themes covered by the educational series. Full research articles on a broad spectrum of subjects, including the molecular and cellular bases of disease, aetiology, pathophysiology, pathology, epidemiology, clinical features, and the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of cancer, will be considered for publication.