Vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a protocol for a single-center doubled-blind randomized sham-controlled clinical trial. VOPE2.
Mikkel Ø Andersen, Andreas K Andresen, Jan Hartvigsen, A Pernille Hermann, Jan Sørensen, Leah Y Carreon
{"title":"Vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a protocol for a single-center doubled-blind randomized sham-controlled clinical trial. VOPE2.","authors":"Mikkel Ø Andersen, Andreas K Andresen, Jan Hartvigsen, A Pernille Hermann, Jan Sørensen, Leah Y Carreon","doi":"10.1186/s13018-024-05301-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One in three women and one in five men over the age of 50 will experience an osteoporotic fracture. Vertebral fractures can be very painful, affect patients' daily function, and in severe cases require hospitalization. Traditionally, fracture pain is treated conservatively with analgesics, and bracing. Vertebral augmentation, also known as vertebroplasty, has been used during the last three decades as a minimally invasive treatment option for vertebral compression fractures, but the evidence base for its efficacy is weak. We describe a double-blind randomized sham-controlled clinical trial to assess the impact of vertebroplasty on self-reported clinical outcomes in patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and vertebral oedema.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two hundred and forty patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures and MRI verified oedema will be randomized in a prospective, double-blind, single-center, clinical trial to either vertebroplasty or a sham procedure, with the possibility of crossover 12 weeks after randomization and operation. The primary outcome will be difference in self-reported pain 12 weeks after treatment between the vertebroplasty and sham group. Secondary outcomes will be patient-reported disability, health-related quality of life, societal costs of treatment and complications. Analysis will be based on intention-to-treat. Repeated measures ANCOVA with baseline ODI, Numerical Pain Rating Scale, EQ-5D-5 L, and number of levels involved as co-variates will be performed.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>With an aging population, the prevalence of osteoporosis and related complications such as vertebral compression fractures is expected to increase. Therefore, there is a growing need for evidence-based fracture treatments. This study fills a gap in the evidence base for treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures and will likely influence future treatment guidelines.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study has been evaluated and approved by the Regional Committees on Health Research for Southern Denmark October 9 2023 (Projekt-ID S-20230058) and the Danish Data Protection Agency 23/40,938. The protocol has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with trial registration number NCT06141187 November 21, 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"19 1","pages":"813"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11607804/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05301-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: One in three women and one in five men over the age of 50 will experience an osteoporotic fracture. Vertebral fractures can be very painful, affect patients' daily function, and in severe cases require hospitalization. Traditionally, fracture pain is treated conservatively with analgesics, and bracing. Vertebral augmentation, also known as vertebroplasty, has been used during the last three decades as a minimally invasive treatment option for vertebral compression fractures, but the evidence base for its efficacy is weak. We describe a double-blind randomized sham-controlled clinical trial to assess the impact of vertebroplasty on self-reported clinical outcomes in patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and vertebral oedema.
Methods: Two hundred and forty patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures and MRI verified oedema will be randomized in a prospective, double-blind, single-center, clinical trial to either vertebroplasty or a sham procedure, with the possibility of crossover 12 weeks after randomization and operation. The primary outcome will be difference in self-reported pain 12 weeks after treatment between the vertebroplasty and sham group. Secondary outcomes will be patient-reported disability, health-related quality of life, societal costs of treatment and complications. Analysis will be based on intention-to-treat. Repeated measures ANCOVA with baseline ODI, Numerical Pain Rating Scale, EQ-5D-5 L, and number of levels involved as co-variates will be performed.
Discussion: With an aging population, the prevalence of osteoporosis and related complications such as vertebral compression fractures is expected to increase. Therefore, there is a growing need for evidence-based fracture treatments. This study fills a gap in the evidence base for treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures and will likely influence future treatment guidelines.
Trial registration: The study has been evaluated and approved by the Regional Committees on Health Research for Southern Denmark October 9 2023 (Projekt-ID S-20230058) and the Danish Data Protection Agency 23/40,938. The protocol has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with trial registration number NCT06141187 November 21, 2023.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues.
Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications.
JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.