{"title":"Viability of Extremely Premature neonates: clinical approaches and outcomes.","authors":"Esin Koc, Sezin Unal","doi":"10.1515/jpm-2024-0432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Viability refers to an infant's ability to survive outside the womb, which is influenced by both developmental maturity and the quality of medical care received. The concept of periviability, which has evolved alongside medical advancements, describes the stage between viability and nonviability, typically spanning from 20<sup>0/7</sup> to 25 <sup>6/7</sup> weeks of gestation. While the chances of survival are extremely low at the earlier end of this range, the possibility of surviving without significant long-term complications improves towards the later end. The effectiveness of various antenatal and postnatal care practices, particularly those considered to be part of an active approach, plays a crucial role in influencing survival rates and mitigating morbidities. However, the decision to provide such active care is heavily influenced by national guidelines as well as international standards. The variability in guideline recommendations from one country to another, coupled with differences based on gestational age or accompanying risk factors, prevents the establishment of a standardized global approach. This variability results in differing practices depending on the country or institution where the birth occurs. Consequently, healthcare providers must navigate these discrepancies, which often leads to complex ethical dilemmas regarding the balance between potential survival and the associated risks. This review article explores the evolution of the definition of viability, the vulnerabilities faced by periviable infants, and the advancements in medical care that have improved survival rates. Additionally, it examines the viability and periviability definitions, the care and outcomes of periviable infants and recommendations in guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":16704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2024-0432","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Viability refers to an infant's ability to survive outside the womb, which is influenced by both developmental maturity and the quality of medical care received. The concept of periviability, which has evolved alongside medical advancements, describes the stage between viability and nonviability, typically spanning from 200/7 to 25 6/7 weeks of gestation. While the chances of survival are extremely low at the earlier end of this range, the possibility of surviving without significant long-term complications improves towards the later end. The effectiveness of various antenatal and postnatal care practices, particularly those considered to be part of an active approach, plays a crucial role in influencing survival rates and mitigating morbidities. However, the decision to provide such active care is heavily influenced by national guidelines as well as international standards. The variability in guideline recommendations from one country to another, coupled with differences based on gestational age or accompanying risk factors, prevents the establishment of a standardized global approach. This variability results in differing practices depending on the country or institution where the birth occurs. Consequently, healthcare providers must navigate these discrepancies, which often leads to complex ethical dilemmas regarding the balance between potential survival and the associated risks. This review article explores the evolution of the definition of viability, the vulnerabilities faced by periviable infants, and the advancements in medical care that have improved survival rates. Additionally, it examines the viability and periviability definitions, the care and outcomes of periviable infants and recommendations in guidelines.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Perinatal Medicine (JPM) is a truly international forum covering the entire field of perinatal medicine. It is an essential news source for all those obstetricians, neonatologists, perinatologists and allied health professionals who wish to keep abreast of progress in perinatal and related research. Ahead-of-print publishing ensures fastest possible knowledge transfer. The Journal provides statements on themes of topical interest as well as information and different views on controversial topics. It also informs about the academic, organisational and political aims and objectives of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine.