Viability of Extremely Premature neonates: clinical approaches and outcomes.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Esin Koc, Sezin Unal
{"title":"Viability of Extremely Premature neonates: clinical approaches and outcomes.","authors":"Esin Koc, Sezin Unal","doi":"10.1515/jpm-2024-0432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Viability refers to an infant's ability to survive outside the womb, which is influenced by both developmental maturity and the quality of medical care received. The concept of periviability, which has evolved alongside medical advancements, describes the stage between viability and nonviability, typically spanning from 20<sup>0/7</sup> to 25 <sup>6/7</sup> weeks of gestation. While the chances of survival are extremely low at the earlier end of this range, the possibility of surviving without significant long-term complications improves towards the later end. The effectiveness of various antenatal and postnatal care practices, particularly those considered to be part of an active approach, plays a crucial role in influencing survival rates and mitigating morbidities. However, the decision to provide such active care is heavily influenced by national guidelines as well as international standards. The variability in guideline recommendations from one country to another, coupled with differences based on gestational age or accompanying risk factors, prevents the establishment of a standardized global approach. This variability results in differing practices depending on the country or institution where the birth occurs. Consequently, healthcare providers must navigate these discrepancies, which often leads to complex ethical dilemmas regarding the balance between potential survival and the associated risks. This review article explores the evolution of the definition of viability, the vulnerabilities faced by periviable infants, and the advancements in medical care that have improved survival rates. Additionally, it examines the viability and periviability definitions, the care and outcomes of periviable infants and recommendations in guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":16704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2024-0432","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Viability refers to an infant's ability to survive outside the womb, which is influenced by both developmental maturity and the quality of medical care received. The concept of periviability, which has evolved alongside medical advancements, describes the stage between viability and nonviability, typically spanning from 200/7 to 25 6/7 weeks of gestation. While the chances of survival are extremely low at the earlier end of this range, the possibility of surviving without significant long-term complications improves towards the later end. The effectiveness of various antenatal and postnatal care practices, particularly those considered to be part of an active approach, plays a crucial role in influencing survival rates and mitigating morbidities. However, the decision to provide such active care is heavily influenced by national guidelines as well as international standards. The variability in guideline recommendations from one country to another, coupled with differences based on gestational age or accompanying risk factors, prevents the establishment of a standardized global approach. This variability results in differing practices depending on the country or institution where the birth occurs. Consequently, healthcare providers must navigate these discrepancies, which often leads to complex ethical dilemmas regarding the balance between potential survival and the associated risks. This review article explores the evolution of the definition of viability, the vulnerabilities faced by periviable infants, and the advancements in medical care that have improved survival rates. Additionally, it examines the viability and periviability definitions, the care and outcomes of periviable infants and recommendations in guidelines.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Perinatal Medicine
Journal of Perinatal Medicine 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatal Medicine (JPM) is a truly international forum covering the entire field of perinatal medicine. It is an essential news source for all those obstetricians, neonatologists, perinatologists and allied health professionals who wish to keep abreast of progress in perinatal and related research. Ahead-of-print publishing ensures fastest possible knowledge transfer. The Journal provides statements on themes of topical interest as well as information and different views on controversial topics. It also informs about the academic, organisational and political aims and objectives of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信