Simultaneous approach in tandem occlusion: a safe, effective, and faster way to achieve recanalization.

IF 4.5 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Ruba Kiwan, Alonso Alvarado-Bolanos, Mosab Maree, Maria Bres-Bullrich, Annika Mascarenhas, Gökce Hatipoglu Majernik, Alistair Jukes, Lisa Xuan, Victor Yang, Michael Mayich, Manas Sharma, Melfort Boulton, Sachin K Pandey
{"title":"Simultaneous approach in tandem occlusion: a safe, effective, and faster way to achieve recanalization.","authors":"Ruba Kiwan, Alonso Alvarado-Bolanos, Mosab Maree, Maria Bres-Bullrich, Annika Mascarenhas, Gökce Hatipoglu Majernik, Alistair Jukes, Lisa Xuan, Victor Yang, Michael Mayich, Manas Sharma, Melfort Boulton, Sachin K Pandey","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2024-022440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is the standard of care for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and intracranial vessel occlusion. Tandem occlusions (TO) comprise 20% of all anterior circulation AIS and are related to a poorer prognosis. The optimal EVT treatment strategy remains controversial. Our main objective was to determine if simultaneous endovascular treatment of intracranial and extracranial occlusions in patients with TO results in faster recanalization times, with similar efficacy and safety, compared with the sequential approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single center, retrospective analysis of patients with TO undergoing EVT using the simultaneous or sequential technical approach. The primary outcome was puncture-to-final recanalization time. Secondary outcomes included modified Rankin scale (mRS) score at 3 months, 30 day mortality, and hemorrhagic transformation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 111 patients with TO (35 treated with the simultaneous approach and 76 treated with the sequential approach). Successful recanalization was achieved in 91.9% of cases, and the first pass effect was 50.5%, with no differences between groups. The simultaneous technique resulted in shorter puncture-to-final recanalization time (33.0 min (IQR 25.0-55.0) vs 52.0 (30.0-73.0), P=0.018), adjusting for number of passes, first pass effect, thrombolysis, age, and previous stroke (adjusted β -0.21 (95% CI -29.47 to -2.79); P=0.018). No significant differences were found in 30 day functional outcome, mortality, or rate of hemorrhagic transformation when comparing simultaneous and sequential techniques.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The simultaneous approach was effective, safe, and faster than the classic sequential approach in patients with TO. This result may obviate the debate over which occlusion should be addressed first during EVT.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2024-022440","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is the standard of care for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and intracranial vessel occlusion. Tandem occlusions (TO) comprise 20% of all anterior circulation AIS and are related to a poorer prognosis. The optimal EVT treatment strategy remains controversial. Our main objective was to determine if simultaneous endovascular treatment of intracranial and extracranial occlusions in patients with TO results in faster recanalization times, with similar efficacy and safety, compared with the sequential approach.

Methods: Single center, retrospective analysis of patients with TO undergoing EVT using the simultaneous or sequential technical approach. The primary outcome was puncture-to-final recanalization time. Secondary outcomes included modified Rankin scale (mRS) score at 3 months, 30 day mortality, and hemorrhagic transformation.

Results: We included 111 patients with TO (35 treated with the simultaneous approach and 76 treated with the sequential approach). Successful recanalization was achieved in 91.9% of cases, and the first pass effect was 50.5%, with no differences between groups. The simultaneous technique resulted in shorter puncture-to-final recanalization time (33.0 min (IQR 25.0-55.0) vs 52.0 (30.0-73.0), P=0.018), adjusting for number of passes, first pass effect, thrombolysis, age, and previous stroke (adjusted β -0.21 (95% CI -29.47 to -2.79); P=0.018). No significant differences were found in 30 day functional outcome, mortality, or rate of hemorrhagic transformation when comparing simultaneous and sequential techniques.

Conclusion: The simultaneous approach was effective, safe, and faster than the classic sequential approach in patients with TO. This result may obviate the debate over which occlusion should be addressed first during EVT.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
14.60%
发文量
291
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信