Is Axillary Lymph Node Dissection Needed? Clinicopathological Correlation in a Series of 224 Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy-Treated Node-Positive Breast Cancers.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Sean M Hacking, Dongling Wu, Charu Taneja, Theresa Graves, Liang Cheng, Yihong Wang
{"title":"Is Axillary Lymph Node Dissection Needed? Clinicopathological Correlation in a Series of 224 Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy-Treated Node-Positive Breast Cancers.","authors":"Sean M Hacking, Dongling Wu, Charu Taneja, Theresa Graves, Liang Cheng, Yihong Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.clbc.2024.11.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Axillary lymph node status is valuable in determining systemic and radiation therapy. Following neoadjuvant therapy for patients with clinically involved axillary nodes, the role of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) following a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a subject of controversy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 224 neoadjuvant chemotherapy-treated node-positive breast cancer cases and evaluated the role of ALND in optimizing staging accuracy and treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 63 (27.8%) underwent ALND based on post neoadjuvant persistent positive lymph nodes on exam /imaging. SLNBs were performed in 161 (71.9%) patients as initial surgical planning; 67 (41.6%) patients had positive SLNB results, and 51 (76.1%) underwent further ALND. In patients with 1 positive sentinel lymph node, follow-up ALND yielded additional positive lymph nodes in 10.5% of cases, whereas in patients with 2 or more positive sentinel lymph nodes, follow-up ALND yielded additional positive lymph nodes in 87.5% of cases. The presence of 2 positive macro-metastatic sentinel lymph nodes significantly predicts additional nodal involvement, especially in patients without a pathologic complete response.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>De-escalation of axillary surgery to SLNB alone in this context may be safely considered in neoadjuvant-treated clinical node positive patient with <2 positive sentinel lymph nodes. Our findings help guide surgeons to appropriately select patients who can potentially benefit from ALND for locoregional control and recommendation for adjuvant radiation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10197,"journal":{"name":"Clinical breast cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical breast cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2024.11.007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Axillary lymph node status is valuable in determining systemic and radiation therapy. Following neoadjuvant therapy for patients with clinically involved axillary nodes, the role of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) following a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a subject of controversy.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 224 neoadjuvant chemotherapy-treated node-positive breast cancer cases and evaluated the role of ALND in optimizing staging accuracy and treatment outcomes.

Results: About 63 (27.8%) underwent ALND based on post neoadjuvant persistent positive lymph nodes on exam /imaging. SLNBs were performed in 161 (71.9%) patients as initial surgical planning; 67 (41.6%) patients had positive SLNB results, and 51 (76.1%) underwent further ALND. In patients with 1 positive sentinel lymph node, follow-up ALND yielded additional positive lymph nodes in 10.5% of cases, whereas in patients with 2 or more positive sentinel lymph nodes, follow-up ALND yielded additional positive lymph nodes in 87.5% of cases. The presence of 2 positive macro-metastatic sentinel lymph nodes significantly predicts additional nodal involvement, especially in patients without a pathologic complete response.

Conclusion: De-escalation of axillary surgery to SLNB alone in this context may be safely considered in neoadjuvant-treated clinical node positive patient with <2 positive sentinel lymph nodes. Our findings help guide surgeons to appropriately select patients who can potentially benefit from ALND for locoregional control and recommendation for adjuvant radiation.

腋窝淋巴结是否需要清扫?224例新辅助化疗治疗淋巴结阳性乳腺癌的临床病理相关性
背景:腋窝淋巴结状态在决定全身和放射治疗中是有价值的。对临床累及腋窝淋巴结的患者进行新辅助治疗后,前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)阳性后腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND)的作用是一个有争议的话题。材料和方法:我们回顾性分析了224例新辅助化疗治疗的淋巴结阳性乳腺癌病例,并评估了ALND在优化分期准确性和治疗结果中的作用。结果:约63例(27.8%)患者接受了基于新辅助后检查/影像学持续阳性淋巴结的ALND。161例(71.9%)患者作为初始手术计划接受了slnb;67例(41.6%)SLNB阳性,51例(76.1%)进一步行ALND。在有1个前哨淋巴结阳性的患者中,随访ALND产生额外阳性淋巴结的病例占10.5%,而在有2个或更多前哨淋巴结阳性的患者中,随访ALND产生额外阳性淋巴结的病例占87.5%。2个阳性大转移前哨淋巴结的存在明显预示着额外的淋巴结累及,特别是在没有病理完全缓解的患者中。结论:在这种情况下,在新佐剂治疗的临床淋巴结阳性患者中,可以安全考虑将腋窝手术降级为单独的SLNB
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical breast cancer
Clinical breast cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
174
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Breast Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of breast cancer. Clinical Breast Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of breast cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to breast cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research reports from various therapeutic modalities, cancer genetics, drug sensitivity and resistance, novel imaging, tumor genomics, biomarkers, and chemoprevention strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信