Informing Modern Models of Care: A Randomized, Sequential Trial of In-Person, Telehealth, and Telephone Appointments for Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1007/s10620-024-08750-w
Ciarán Galts, Braden Siempelkamp, Kia Duthie, Laura Wilson, Dustin E Loomes
{"title":"Informing Modern Models of Care: A Randomized, Sequential Trial of In-Person, Telehealth, and Telephone Appointments for Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.","authors":"Ciarán Galts, Braden Siempelkamp, Kia Duthie, Laura Wilson, Dustin E Loomes","doi":"10.1007/s10620-024-08750-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A significant shift toward virtual care has occurred for many patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). To date, there are no prospective studies assessing patients visits across different styles of appointments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomized IBD patients' appointments to in-person, video-assisted virtual, or telephone and subsequent appointments to the alternate style of visit in a single-center study in Victoria, Canada. Participants completed surveys after each appointment. Demographic data were collected and average scores were analyzed for potential associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-one patients were randomized to appointments, and 86 post-appointment surveys were completed, 30 in-person, 29 telephone, and 27 telehealth. The average age was 46.5 ± 18 years and 59% were female. The overall patient score (out of ten) by appointment type was 9.1 ± 1.0 for in-person, 7.8 ± 2.1 for telephone, and 8.0 ± 2.6 for telehealth without a statistically significant difference. While there was only a near statistically significant preference for in-person appointments compared with telehealth p = 0.055, it was statistically significant when comparing with phone appointments p = 0.014. The highest rated factors for preference of an in-person appointment were optimal communication and interaction with care provider (86%). For patients who preferred telehealth or telephone appointments, the highest rated factors were time and cost savings (71%, 43% and 58%, 33%, respectively). In-person appointments were associated with a significantly higher cost (p < 0.01), and longer time commitment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the increased cost and time commitment, in-person appointments were highly rated particularly in comparison to phone appointments. Based on this research, providers can be better informed on factors contributing to patients' preferred appointment style.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"128-135"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08750-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A significant shift toward virtual care has occurred for many patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). To date, there are no prospective studies assessing patients visits across different styles of appointments.

Methods: We randomized IBD patients' appointments to in-person, video-assisted virtual, or telephone and subsequent appointments to the alternate style of visit in a single-center study in Victoria, Canada. Participants completed surveys after each appointment. Demographic data were collected and average scores were analyzed for potential associations.

Results: Forty-one patients were randomized to appointments, and 86 post-appointment surveys were completed, 30 in-person, 29 telephone, and 27 telehealth. The average age was 46.5 ± 18 years and 59% were female. The overall patient score (out of ten) by appointment type was 9.1 ± 1.0 for in-person, 7.8 ± 2.1 for telephone, and 8.0 ± 2.6 for telehealth without a statistically significant difference. While there was only a near statistically significant preference for in-person appointments compared with telehealth p = 0.055, it was statistically significant when comparing with phone appointments p = 0.014. The highest rated factors for preference of an in-person appointment were optimal communication and interaction with care provider (86%). For patients who preferred telehealth or telephone appointments, the highest rated factors were time and cost savings (71%, 43% and 58%, 33%, respectively). In-person appointments were associated with a significantly higher cost (p < 0.01), and longer time commitment.

Conclusions: Despite the increased cost and time commitment, in-person appointments were highly rated particularly in comparison to phone appointments. Based on this research, providers can be better informed on factors contributing to patients' preferred appointment style.

告知现代护理模式:炎症性肠病患者面对面、远程医疗和电话预约的随机顺序试验。
背景:许多炎症性肠病(IBD)患者已经发生了向虚拟护理的重大转变。到目前为止,还没有前瞻性研究评估不同类型预约的患者就诊情况。方法:在加拿大维多利亚州的一项单中心研究中,我们将IBD患者的预约随机分为面对面、视频辅助虚拟或电话,随后的预约以其他方式进行。参与者在每次预约后完成调查。收集了人口统计数据,并对平均得分进行了潜在关联分析。结果:41例患者随机接受预约,完成预约后问卷调查86份,其中面对面问卷30份,电话问卷29份,远程问卷27份。平均年龄46.5±18岁,女性占59%。按预约类型划分的患者总得分(满分为10分),面对面医疗为9.1±1.0分,电话医疗为7.8±2.1分,远程医疗为8.0±2.6分,差异无统计学意义。虽然与远程医疗相比,面对面预约的偏好在统计学上只有接近显著的差异(p = 0.055),但与电话预约相比,这在统计学上是显著的(p = 0.014)。对亲自预约的偏好评分最高的因素是与护理提供者的最佳沟通和互动(86%)。对于倾向于远程医疗或电话预约的患者,评价最高的因素是节省时间和成本(分别为71%、43%和58%、33%)。结论:尽管增加了成本和时间投入,但与电话预约相比,面对面预约的评价很高。基于这项研究,提供者可以更好地了解影响患者首选预约方式的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Digestive Diseases and Sciences 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
420
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信