Using ultrafast angio planewave ultrasensitive and conventional doppler imaging techniques to assess intramuscular blood perfusion in older adults.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Tiev Miller, Nonhlanhla Chambara, Michael Tin Cheung Ying, Marco Yiu Chung Pang
{"title":"Using ultrafast angio planewave ultrasensitive and conventional doppler imaging techniques to assess intramuscular blood perfusion in older adults.","authors":"Tiev Miller, Nonhlanhla Chambara, Michael Tin Cheung Ying, Marco Yiu Chung Pang","doi":"10.1186/s12880-024-01495-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Microvascular ultrasound imaging techniques such as Angio PLanewave UltraSensitive (Angio-PL.U.S.) have been used to detect microvascular blood flow in various organs and tissues. However, the advantage of Angio-PL.U.S. for assessing muscle microvascularity over other non-invasive imaging modalities has not been investigated. This cross-sectional study compared ultrafast Angio-PL.U.S. and conventional color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) techniques for assessing intramuscular blood perfusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-five older adults participated (age = 59.1 ± 7.6). The vascularity index (VI) was used to quantify intramuscular blood flow of the bilateral biceps brachii (BB) and medial gastrocnemius (MG). Intra-limb (difference in VI between CDFI and Angio-PL.U.S. techniques) and inter-limb differences [percent side-to-side differences (%SSD) in VI between dominant and non-dominant sides] were compared using Wilcoxon Signed Ranks and Mann-Whitney U tests, respectively. Associations between techniques were assessed using Spearman's rho (ρ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed between dominant and non-dominant BB (p ≥ 0.053) and MG (p ≥ 0.756) for both CDFI-VI and Angio-PL.U.S.-VI. Only VI measures for the non-dominant BB demonstrated significant intra-limb difference between techniques (p = 0.002). A significant %SSD between techniques was observed for BB (p = 0.022) but not MG (p = 0.225). Strong to very strong correlations were observed between CDFI-VI and Angio-PL.U.S.-VI across all muscles (ρ = 0.616-0.814, p ≤ 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultrafast Angio-PL.U.S. and conventional ultrasound imaging techniques were comparable when used in conjunction with the VI for quantifying resting intramuscular blood flow. Angio-PL.U.S. appeared to be more sensitive in detecting bilateral disparities in upper extremity muscles. However, further research is needed to validate these findings and investigate the potential clinical utility of this technique for characterizing disease progression in populations with global or unilateral musculoskeletal tissue alterations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"24 1","pages":"324"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11606232/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-024-01495-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Microvascular ultrasound imaging techniques such as Angio PLanewave UltraSensitive (Angio-PL.U.S.) have been used to detect microvascular blood flow in various organs and tissues. However, the advantage of Angio-PL.U.S. for assessing muscle microvascularity over other non-invasive imaging modalities has not been investigated. This cross-sectional study compared ultrafast Angio-PL.U.S. and conventional color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) techniques for assessing intramuscular blood perfusion.

Methods: Forty-five older adults participated (age = 59.1 ± 7.6). The vascularity index (VI) was used to quantify intramuscular blood flow of the bilateral biceps brachii (BB) and medial gastrocnemius (MG). Intra-limb (difference in VI between CDFI and Angio-PL.U.S. techniques) and inter-limb differences [percent side-to-side differences (%SSD) in VI between dominant and non-dominant sides] were compared using Wilcoxon Signed Ranks and Mann-Whitney U tests, respectively. Associations between techniques were assessed using Spearman's rho (ρ).

Results: No significant differences were observed between dominant and non-dominant BB (p ≥ 0.053) and MG (p ≥ 0.756) for both CDFI-VI and Angio-PL.U.S.-VI. Only VI measures for the non-dominant BB demonstrated significant intra-limb difference between techniques (p = 0.002). A significant %SSD between techniques was observed for BB (p = 0.022) but not MG (p = 0.225). Strong to very strong correlations were observed between CDFI-VI and Angio-PL.U.S.-VI across all muscles (ρ = 0.616-0.814, p ≤ 0.001).

Conclusion: Ultrafast Angio-PL.U.S. and conventional ultrasound imaging techniques were comparable when used in conjunction with the VI for quantifying resting intramuscular blood flow. Angio-PL.U.S. appeared to be more sensitive in detecting bilateral disparities in upper extremity muscles. However, further research is needed to validate these findings and investigate the potential clinical utility of this technique for characterizing disease progression in populations with global or unilateral musculoskeletal tissue alterations.

应用超快血管平面波超灵敏和常规多普勒成像技术评估老年人肌肉内血流灌注。
背景:微血管超声成像技术,如Angio PLanewave UltraSensitive (Angio- pl . us)已被用于检测各种器官和组织的微血管血流。然而,血管造影的优势。与其他非侵入性成像方式相比,评估肌肉微血管的方法尚未得到研究。本横断面研究比较了超快速血管造影。和常规彩色多普勒血流成像(CDFI)技术评估肌肉内血流灌注。方法:老年人45例(年龄= 59.1±7.6)。采用血管指数(VI)量化双侧肱二头肌(BB)和内侧腓肠肌(MG)的肌内血流量。CDFI与血管- pl - us的肢体内VI值差异。分别使用Wilcoxon sign rank和Mann-Whitney U检验比较优势侧和非优势侧的侧对侧差异百分比(%SSD)和肢间差异。使用Spearman's rho (ρ)评估技术之间的相关性。结果:CDFI-VI和Angio-PL.U.S.-VI在显性和非显性BB和MG之间无显著差异(p≥0.053)。只有非优势BB的VI测量显示不同技术之间存在显著的肢体内差异(p = 0.002)。两种技术之间,BB有显著的%SSD (p = 0.022), MG没有(p = 0.225)。在CDFI-VI和血管- pl - us之间观察到强到非常强的相关性。六世所有肌肉(ρ= 0.616 - -0.814,p≤0.001)。结论:超快速血管造影。与传统的超声成像技术相结合,当使用VI来量化静息肌内血流时,效果相当。Angio-PL.U.S。在检测双侧上肢肌肉差异时似乎更敏感。然而,需要进一步的研究来验证这些发现,并调查该技术在全球或单侧肌肉骨骼组织改变人群中表征疾病进展的潜在临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信