Intraoperative optical coherence tomography imaging for assessment of anterior chamber gas fill.

IF 0.9
Frontiers in ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-11-14 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fopht.2024.1488764
Michael Tseng, Avrey Thau, Carla Berkowitz, Abhijit Ramaprasad, Surendra Basti
{"title":"Intraoperative optical coherence tomography imaging for assessment of anterior chamber gas fill.","authors":"Michael Tseng, Avrey Thau, Carla Berkowitz, Abhijit Ramaprasad, Surendra Basti","doi":"10.3389/fopht.2024.1488764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>During endothelial keratoplasty, anterior chamber gas is titrated to a desired fill, which is difficult to optimize by visualization alone. This study evaluates how an anterior chamber gas fill correlates with intraocular pressure (IOP) and iris-angle configuration as identified by optical coherence tomography (OCT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven cadaveric eyes were studied in three configurations: baseline, air-fill just spanning limbus-to-limbus (\"full-fill\"), and air-fill maximally filling the anterior chamber (\"overfill\"). At each configuration, IOP was measured by Tonopen and iris-angle was determined by analyzing OCT images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No differences in IOP or irisangles were identified between baseline and full-fill configurations (p=0.113 and p=0.152, respectively). When compared to overfill configuration, differences in IOP and iris-angles were identified for baseline (p<0.001 and p=0.001, respectively) and full-fill configuration (p=0.001 and p=0.039, respectively).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings highlight that en-face visualization of full-fill may not be indicative of IOP elevation. A significant difference in IOP and iris-angle exists between full-fill and overfill configurations. Intraoperative OCT can serve as a useful surrogate to identify the extent of fill.</p>","PeriodicalId":73096,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in ophthalmology","volume":"4 ","pages":"1488764"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11602447/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fopht.2024.1488764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: During endothelial keratoplasty, anterior chamber gas is titrated to a desired fill, which is difficult to optimize by visualization alone. This study evaluates how an anterior chamber gas fill correlates with intraocular pressure (IOP) and iris-angle configuration as identified by optical coherence tomography (OCT).

Methods: Eleven cadaveric eyes were studied in three configurations: baseline, air-fill just spanning limbus-to-limbus ("full-fill"), and air-fill maximally filling the anterior chamber ("overfill"). At each configuration, IOP was measured by Tonopen and iris-angle was determined by analyzing OCT images.

Results: No differences in IOP or irisangles were identified between baseline and full-fill configurations (p=0.113 and p=0.152, respectively). When compared to overfill configuration, differences in IOP and iris-angles were identified for baseline (p<0.001 and p=0.001, respectively) and full-fill configuration (p=0.001 and p=0.039, respectively).

Discussion: These findings highlight that en-face visualization of full-fill may not be indicative of IOP elevation. A significant difference in IOP and iris-angle exists between full-fill and overfill configurations. Intraoperative OCT can serve as a useful surrogate to identify the extent of fill.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

术中光学相干断层成像评估前房气体充盈。
在内皮角膜移植术中,前房气体被滴定到所需的填充,这很难通过单独的可视化来优化。本研究评估了通过光学相干断层扫描(OCT)识别的前房气体填充与眼内压(IOP)和虹膜角度结构的相关性。方法:对11只尸体眼进行三种形态的研究:基线、充气刚好跨越眼缘到眼缘(“全充”)和充气最大程度地填充前房(“过充”)。在每种构型下,通过Tonopen测量IOP,通过分析OCT图像确定虹膜角度。结果:在基线和全填充配置之间,IOP和虹膜没有差异(p=0.113和p=0.152)。当与过填充配置进行比较时,确定了IOP和虹膜角度的基线差异(讨论:这些研究结果强调,满填充的正面可视化可能不能指示IOP升高。全补眼和过补眼在IOP和虹膜角度上存在显著差异。术中OCT可作为确定填充程度的有用替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信