Development of a productivity model at a pharmacy consolidated service center.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Amelia Hornaday, Philipp Monterroyo, Lindsay Reulbach, Catherine Bishop, Harrison Jozefczyk
{"title":"Development of a productivity model at a pharmacy consolidated service center.","authors":"Amelia Hornaday, Philipp Monterroyo, Lindsay Reulbach, Catherine Bishop, Harrison Jozefczyk","doi":"10.1016/j.japh.2024.102298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health systems have implemented pharmacy consolidated service centers (PCSCs) to address increased patient volume, elevated drug costs, and decreased reimbursements. Assessing pharmacy productivity remains a challenge given that metrics have historically been determined by calculations of variables that do not capture the actual work. Several investigators have demonstrated improved labor outcomes in health-system pharmacy with the use of novel productivity models. However, the utility of a novel productivity model at a PCSC has not been assessed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop a productivity model with validation by comparison to past time periods to represent work at a PCSC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The amount of time needed to complete work was determined by performing time studies. A modified Delphi process was used to ensure an appropriate perception of workload. Time standards for each category were averaged to determine the specific relative value units, which were then multiplied by total biweekly orders and combined with fixed activities to determine the unit of service. Actual hours worked were obtained for 6 prior pay periods to compare tool productivity with actual productivity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Time studies were performed over a 3-month period. The total average hours per pay period calculated by the tool for repackaging was 167.4 or 2.1 full-time equivalents (FTEs) and for warehousing was 176.8 or 2.2 FTEs. Although tool productivity followed the same trends as historical calendar day productivity, it was consistently higher per pay period over the 12-week comparison.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By performing time studies, a productivity model was developed for a PCSC that generated productivity data that correlated with 12 weeks of data using a historical model. This study provides the ability to assess trends over time with a more precise evaluation of work leading to the discussion that this tool is superior to historical productivity models.</p>","PeriodicalId":50015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","volume":" ","pages":"102298"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2024.102298","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Health systems have implemented pharmacy consolidated service centers (PCSCs) to address increased patient volume, elevated drug costs, and decreased reimbursements. Assessing pharmacy productivity remains a challenge given that metrics have historically been determined by calculations of variables that do not capture the actual work. Several investigators have demonstrated improved labor outcomes in health-system pharmacy with the use of novel productivity models. However, the utility of a novel productivity model at a PCSC has not been assessed.

Objective: This study aimed to develop a productivity model with validation by comparison to past time periods to represent work at a PCSC.

Methods: The amount of time needed to complete work was determined by performing time studies. A modified Delphi process was used to ensure an appropriate perception of workload. Time standards for each category were averaged to determine the specific relative value units, which were then multiplied by total biweekly orders and combined with fixed activities to determine the unit of service. Actual hours worked were obtained for 6 prior pay periods to compare tool productivity with actual productivity.

Results: Time studies were performed over a 3-month period. The total average hours per pay period calculated by the tool for repackaging was 167.4 or 2.1 full-time equivalents (FTEs) and for warehousing was 176.8 or 2.2 FTEs. Although tool productivity followed the same trends as historical calendar day productivity, it was consistently higher per pay period over the 12-week comparison.

Conclusion: By performing time studies, a productivity model was developed for a PCSC that generated productivity data that correlated with 12 weeks of data using a historical model. This study provides the ability to assess trends over time with a more precise evaluation of work leading to the discussion that this tool is superior to historical productivity models.

某药房综合服务中心生产力模型的建立。
背景:卫生系统已经实施了药房综合服务中心,以解决患者数量增加、药品成本上升和报销减少的问题。评估药房生产力仍然是一个挑战,因为历史上的指标是通过计算变量来确定的,这些变量不能捕捉实际工作。一些研究人员已经证明了改善劳动结果在卫生系统药房与使用新的生产力模型。然而,一种新的生产力模型在药房综合服务中心的效用尚未得到评估。目的:开发一个生产力模型,并通过与过去的时间周期进行比较来验证,以代表药房综合服务中心的工作。方法:通过时间研究确定完成工作所需的时间。采用改进的德尔菲过程来确保适当的工作量感知。对每个类别的时间标准取平均值,以确定具体的相对价值单位,然后将其乘以两周总订单,并与固定活动相结合,以确定服务单位。在比较工具生产率与实际生产率之前,获得了六个工资期的实际工作时间。结果:时间研究在三个月的时间内进行。由重新包装工具计算的每个工资期的总平均工作时数为167.4或2.1全职等值工时,而仓储工作时数为176.8或2.2全职等值工时。虽然工具生产率遵循与历史日历日生产率相同的趋势,但在12周的比较中,每个付款期的生产率始终较高。结论:通过执行时间研究,为药房综合服务中心开发了一个生产力模型,该模型使用历史模型生成与12周数据相关的生产力数据。这项研究提供了通过更精确的工作评估来评估随时间变化的趋势的能力,从而导致了该工具优于历史生产力模型的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
336
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Pharmacists Association is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Pharmacists Association (APhA), providing information on pharmaceutical care, drug therapy, diseases and other health issues, trends in pharmacy practice and therapeutics, informed opinion, and original research. JAPhA publishes original research, reviews, experiences, and opinion articles that link science to contemporary pharmacy practice to improve patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信