Comparison of Anaerobic Culture Methods for Detecting Clostridioides difficile in Bovine Faeces.

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Laurel E Redding, Scott G Daniel, Alexander Smith, Orlaith Keenan, Denise Barnhart, Joseph P Zackular
{"title":"Comparison of Anaerobic Culture Methods for Detecting Clostridioides difficile in Bovine Faeces.","authors":"Laurel E Redding, Scott G Daniel, Alexander Smith, Orlaith Keenan, Denise Barnhart, Joseph P Zackular","doi":"10.1002/vms3.70085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The study of the epidemiology of Clostridioides difficile in populations is greatly facilitated by the ability to isolate and further characterize individual organisms, which requires effective culture protocols. In cattle, where little is known about the epidemiology of C. difficile, no studies have assessed or compared the performance of different assays for detecting C. difficile.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study compared two culture protocols for detecting C. difficile in bovine faeces from 121 gestating cows and 70 of their neonatal calves, while situating results obtained with each protocol relative to those obtained with shotgun metagenomic sequencing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Protocol 1 involved direct plating enrichment onto taurocholine-cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar (TCCFA), while Protocol 2 included an ethanol shock step before plating on CCFA/ChromID agar. For both protocols, one aliquot underwent broth enrichment prior to plating, while the other aliquot did not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clostridioides difficile was detected following broth enrichment in two of the same calf samples using both protocols, and an additional cow sample was found to be positive with Protocol 2, though the difference in detection rates was not statistically significant (p = 1.0).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The detection of C. difficile in a much high number of these samples by shotgun metagenomics, albeit at low levels of relative abundance, suggests that neither of these culture protocols is sensitive when levels of abundance are low.</p>","PeriodicalId":23543,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Medicine and Science","volume":"11 1","pages":"e70085"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11605475/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Medicine and Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.70085","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The study of the epidemiology of Clostridioides difficile in populations is greatly facilitated by the ability to isolate and further characterize individual organisms, which requires effective culture protocols. In cattle, where little is known about the epidemiology of C. difficile, no studies have assessed or compared the performance of different assays for detecting C. difficile.

Objectives: This study compared two culture protocols for detecting C. difficile in bovine faeces from 121 gestating cows and 70 of their neonatal calves, while situating results obtained with each protocol relative to those obtained with shotgun metagenomic sequencing.

Methods: Protocol 1 involved direct plating enrichment onto taurocholine-cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar (TCCFA), while Protocol 2 included an ethanol shock step before plating on CCFA/ChromID agar. For both protocols, one aliquot underwent broth enrichment prior to plating, while the other aliquot did not.

Results: Clostridioides difficile was detected following broth enrichment in two of the same calf samples using both protocols, and an additional cow sample was found to be positive with Protocol 2, though the difference in detection rates was not statistically significant (p = 1.0).

Conclusions: The detection of C. difficile in a much high number of these samples by shotgun metagenomics, albeit at low levels of relative abundance, suggests that neither of these culture protocols is sensitive when levels of abundance are low.

牛粪便中艰难梭菌厌氧培养检测方法的比较。
背景:艰难梭菌在群体中的流行病学研究很大程度上得益于分离和进一步描述个体生物的能力,这需要有效的培养方案。在牛中,人们对艰难梭菌的流行病学知之甚少,没有研究评估或比较检测艰难梭菌的不同检测方法的性能。目的:本研究比较了121头奶牛和70头新生牛犊粪便中艰难梭菌的两种培养方案,并将每种方案获得的结果与霰弹枪宏基因组测序结果进行了比较。方法:方案1涉及直接在牛磺酸胆碱-环丝氨酸-头孢西丁-果糖琼脂(TCCFA)上进行富集,而方案2包括在CCFA/ChromID琼脂上镀前的乙醇冲击步骤。在这两种方案中,一种样品在镀前进行了肉汤浓缩,而另一种样品没有。结果:使用两种方案在两个相同的小牛样本中进行肉汤富集后检测到艰难梭菌,并且在方案2中发现另外一个牛样本呈阳性,尽管检出率差异无统计学意义(p = 1.0)。结论:霰弹枪宏基因组学在大量样本中检测到艰难梭菌,尽管相对丰度较低,但这表明当丰度较低时,这两种培养方案都不敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary Medicine and Science
Veterinary Medicine and Science Veterinary-General Veterinary
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
296
期刊介绍: Veterinary Medicine and Science is the peer-reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of research in all areas of veterinary medicine and science. The journal aims to serve the research community by providing a vehicle for authors wishing to publish interesting and high quality work in both fundamental and clinical veterinary medicine and science. Veterinary Medicine and Science publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper. We aim to be a truly global forum for high-quality research in veterinary medicine and science, and believe that the best research should be published and made widely accessible as quickly as possible. Veterinary Medicine and Science publishes papers submitted directly to the journal and those referred from a select group of prestigious journals published by Wiley-Blackwell. Veterinary Medicine and Science is a Wiley Open Access journal, one of a new series of peer-reviewed titles publishing quality research with speed and efficiency. For further information visit the Wiley Open Access website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信