Association Between Monounsaturated Fatty Acid Intake and Risk of Total Stroke and Its Subtypes: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Amirmasoud Mehrabani, Moharam Jalalzadeh, Nooshin Jannati, Keyhan Lotfi, Pishva Arzhang, Leila Azadbakht
{"title":"Association Between Monounsaturated Fatty Acid Intake and Risk of Total Stroke and Its Subtypes: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.","authors":"Amirmasoud Mehrabani, Moharam Jalalzadeh, Nooshin Jannati, Keyhan Lotfi, Pishva Arzhang, Leila Azadbakht","doi":"10.1093/nutrit/nuae185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>There are contradictory results regarding the relationship between dietary intakes of monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) and risk of stroke.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to review the existing body of research on the relationship between MUFA consumption and stroke risk through a systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Data source: </strong>PubMed, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science were all systematically searched up to January 2023.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>A total of 11 prospective cohort studies that investigated MUFA consumption in relation to stroke risk were included.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>Relative risk (RR) and 95% CIs for the highest vs lowest category of dietary MUFA intake were combined using a random-effects model. Linear and nonlinear dose-response relations were assessed through 1-stage weighted mixed-effects meta-analysis. These studies included 475 207 participants and 8438 cases. In highest vs lowest consumption analysis, MUFA intake was inversely associated with total stroke (RR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.67, 0.96; I2 =65.2%, Q-test P = .001; n = 11) and hemorrhagic stroke (RR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.68, 0.95; I2 = 0.0%, Q-test P = .77; n = 5) risk. Conversely, this association was not significant for ischemic stroke (RR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.69, 1.07; I2 =62.3%, Q-test P = .01; n = 8). An inverse association was observed between each 10-g/d MUFA intake and hemorrhagic stroke (RR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.65, 0.96) but not total and ischemic stroke. We did not find any evidence for a nonlinear association between MUFA intake and total stroke and its subtypes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis shows that higher MUFA intake could lower the risk of total and hemorrhagic, but not ischemic, stroke. This could be important for public health.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO registration no. CRD42023458555.</p>","PeriodicalId":19469,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuae185","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: There are contradictory results regarding the relationship between dietary intakes of monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) and risk of stroke.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to review the existing body of research on the relationship between MUFA consumption and stroke risk through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data source: PubMed, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science were all systematically searched up to January 2023.

Data extraction: A total of 11 prospective cohort studies that investigated MUFA consumption in relation to stroke risk were included.

Data analysis: Relative risk (RR) and 95% CIs for the highest vs lowest category of dietary MUFA intake were combined using a random-effects model. Linear and nonlinear dose-response relations were assessed through 1-stage weighted mixed-effects meta-analysis. These studies included 475 207 participants and 8438 cases. In highest vs lowest consumption analysis, MUFA intake was inversely associated with total stroke (RR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.67, 0.96; I2 =65.2%, Q-test P = .001; n = 11) and hemorrhagic stroke (RR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.68, 0.95; I2 = 0.0%, Q-test P = .77; n = 5) risk. Conversely, this association was not significant for ischemic stroke (RR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.69, 1.07; I2 =62.3%, Q-test P = .01; n = 8). An inverse association was observed between each 10-g/d MUFA intake and hemorrhagic stroke (RR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.65, 0.96) but not total and ischemic stroke. We did not find any evidence for a nonlinear association between MUFA intake and total stroke and its subtypes.

Conclusion: This meta-analysis shows that higher MUFA intake could lower the risk of total and hemorrhagic, but not ischemic, stroke. This could be important for public health.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42023458555.

单不饱和脂肪酸摄入与总卒中及其亚型风险之间的关系:前瞻性队列研究的系统回顾和剂量反应荟萃分析。
背景:关于膳食摄入单不饱和脂肪酸(MUFAs)与中风风险之间的关系,有相互矛盾的结果。目的:本研究的目的是通过系统回顾和荟萃分析来回顾MUFA消费与卒中风险之间关系的现有研究。数据来源:系统检索PubMed、Scopus和ISI Web of Science,截止到2023年1月。数据提取:共纳入了11项前瞻性队列研究,调查了MUFA摄入与卒中风险的关系。数据分析:采用随机效应模型,将最高和最低膳食中多游离脂肪酸摄入量的相对风险(RR)和95% ci相结合。通过1期加权混合效应meta分析评估线性和非线性剂量-反应关系。这些研究包括475 207名参与者和8438例病例。在最高与最低摄入分析中,MUFA摄入量与总卒中呈负相关(RR: 0.80;95% ci: 0.67, 0.96;I2 =65.2%, q检验P = .001;n = 11)和出血性卒中(RR: 0.80;95% ci: 0.68, 0.95;I2 = 0.0%, q检验P = 0.77;N = 5)风险。相反,这种关联在缺血性卒中中不显著(RR: 0.86;95% ci: 0.69, 1.07;I2 =62.3%, q检验P = 0.01;n = 8)。每10 g/d MUFA摄入量与出血性卒中呈负相关(RR: 0.79;95% CI: 0.65, 0.96),但不包括全脑卒中和缺血性卒中。我们没有发现任何证据表明多足脂肪酸摄入量与总卒中及其亚型之间存在非线性关联。结论:这项荟萃分析显示,较高的MUFA摄入量可以降低全卒中和出血性卒中的风险,但不能降低缺血性卒中的风险。这可能对公众健康很重要。系统评审注册:普洛斯彼罗注册号。CRD42023458555。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutrition reviews
Nutrition reviews 医学-营养学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition Reviews is a highly cited, monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that specializes in the publication of authoritative and critical literature reviews on current and emerging topics in nutrition science, food science, clinical nutrition, and nutrition policy. Readers of Nutrition Reviews include nutrition scientists, biomedical researchers, clinical and dietetic practitioners, and advanced students of nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信