Multisocietal Consensus on the Use of Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC for the Treatment of Diffuse Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma: A GRADE Approach for Evidence Evaluation and Recommendation.
Shigeki Kusamura, Michela Cinquini, David Morris, Pompiliu Piso, Hedy Kindler, Andreas Brandl, Edward Levine, Olivier Glehen, Vahan Kepenekian, Olivia Sgarbura, Paul H Sugarbaker, Dario Baratti, Guaglio Marcello, Deraco Marcello
{"title":"Multisocietal Consensus on the Use of Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC for the Treatment of Diffuse Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma: A GRADE Approach for Evidence Evaluation and Recommendation.","authors":"Shigeki Kusamura, Michela Cinquini, David Morris, Pompiliu Piso, Hedy Kindler, Andreas Brandl, Edward Levine, Olivier Glehen, Vahan Kepenekian, Olivia Sgarbura, Paul H Sugarbaker, Dario Baratti, Guaglio Marcello, Deraco Marcello","doi":"10.1002/jso.27947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) previously issued a recommendation endorsing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for treating diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM). However, broader acceptance of this approach, particularly within some segments of medical oncology, remains limited. To address this, PSOGI initiated a multisociety consensus effort, involving multidisciplinary International Societies, to strengthen and expand the endorsement of CRS-HIPEC for DMPM. Using the GRADE ADOLOPMENT approach, the expert panel systematically reviewed existing guidelines and evaluated the available evidence to reinforce the recommendation. The panel unanimously recommended CRS-HIPEC for a carefully selected subset of DMPM patients, emphasizing that this approach offers the best potential for improved survival compared to systemic chemotherapy alone. Despite the very low certainty of evidence, a strong recommendation was issued, reflecting the panel's recognition of the life-threatening feature of DMPM and the limited efficacy of systemic chemotherapy. This consensus also highlights the importance of centralized and expert-driven care. The recommendation aligns with previous guidelines and underscores the critical need for broader acceptance of this treatment strategy in managing this rare and aggressive malignancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27947","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) previously issued a recommendation endorsing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for treating diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM). However, broader acceptance of this approach, particularly within some segments of medical oncology, remains limited. To address this, PSOGI initiated a multisociety consensus effort, involving multidisciplinary International Societies, to strengthen and expand the endorsement of CRS-HIPEC for DMPM. Using the GRADE ADOLOPMENT approach, the expert panel systematically reviewed existing guidelines and evaluated the available evidence to reinforce the recommendation. The panel unanimously recommended CRS-HIPEC for a carefully selected subset of DMPM patients, emphasizing that this approach offers the best potential for improved survival compared to systemic chemotherapy alone. Despite the very low certainty of evidence, a strong recommendation was issued, reflecting the panel's recognition of the life-threatening feature of DMPM and the limited efficacy of systemic chemotherapy. This consensus also highlights the importance of centralized and expert-driven care. The recommendation aligns with previous guidelines and underscores the critical need for broader acceptance of this treatment strategy in managing this rare and aggressive malignancy.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.