Liver volumetry improves evaluation of treatment response to hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy in uveal melanoma patients with liver metastases.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Radiology and Oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-28 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.2478/raon-2024-0063
Sebastian Zensen, Hannah L Steinberg-Vorhoff, Aleksandar Milosevic, Heike Richly, Jens T Siveke, Marcel Opitz, Johannes Haubold, Yan Li, Michael Forsting, Benedikt Michael Schaarschmidt
{"title":"Liver volumetry improves evaluation of treatment response to hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy in uveal melanoma patients with liver metastases.","authors":"Sebastian Zensen, Hannah L Steinberg-Vorhoff, Aleksandar Milosevic, Heike Richly, Jens T Siveke, Marcel Opitz, Johannes Haubold, Yan Li, Michael Forsting, Benedikt Michael Schaarschmidt","doi":"10.2478/raon-2024-0063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In uveal melanoma patients, short-term evaluation of treatment response to hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria is challenging due to the diffuse metastatic spread. As liver enlargement can frequently be observed, this study aims to compare RECIST 1.1 and liver volumetry (LV) for the evaluation of HAIC treatment response.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Treatment response was evaluated in 143 patients (mean age 65.1 ± 10.9 years, 54% female) treated by HAIC by RECIST 1.1 and LV on CT imaging performed before and after HAIC. In LV, different increases in liver volume were evaluated to set an effective threshold to distinguish between stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD). Overall survival (OS) was calculated as the time from first HAIC to patient death using Kaplan-Meier test and multivariate analysis was performed for RECIST 1.1 and LV.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the overall population, median OS (mOS) was 13.5 months (95% CI 11.2-15.8 months). In LV, a threshold of 10% increase in liver volume was suited to identify patients with significantly reduced OS (SD: 103/143 patients, mOS 15.9 months; PD: 40/143 patients, 6.6 months; p < 0.001). Compared to RECIST 1.1, LV was the only significant prognostic factor that was able to identify a decreased OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In uveal melanoma patients with liver metastases, LV with a threshold for liver volume increase of 10% was suitable to evaluate treatment response and would be able to be used as a valuable add-on or even alternative to RECIST 1.1.</p>","PeriodicalId":21034,"journal":{"name":"Radiology and Oncology","volume":"58 4","pages":"509-516"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11604257/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2024-0063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In uveal melanoma patients, short-term evaluation of treatment response to hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria is challenging due to the diffuse metastatic spread. As liver enlargement can frequently be observed, this study aims to compare RECIST 1.1 and liver volumetry (LV) for the evaluation of HAIC treatment response.

Patients and methods: Treatment response was evaluated in 143 patients (mean age 65.1 ± 10.9 years, 54% female) treated by HAIC by RECIST 1.1 and LV on CT imaging performed before and after HAIC. In LV, different increases in liver volume were evaluated to set an effective threshold to distinguish between stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD). Overall survival (OS) was calculated as the time from first HAIC to patient death using Kaplan-Meier test and multivariate analysis was performed for RECIST 1.1 and LV.

Results: In the overall population, median OS (mOS) was 13.5 months (95% CI 11.2-15.8 months). In LV, a threshold of 10% increase in liver volume was suited to identify patients with significantly reduced OS (SD: 103/143 patients, mOS 15.9 months; PD: 40/143 patients, 6.6 months; p < 0.001). Compared to RECIST 1.1, LV was the only significant prognostic factor that was able to identify a decreased OS.

Conclusions: In uveal melanoma patients with liver metastases, LV with a threshold for liver volume increase of 10% was suitable to evaluate treatment response and would be able to be used as a valuable add-on or even alternative to RECIST 1.1.

肝容量测定提高了葡萄膜黑色素瘤伴肝转移患者肝动脉输注化疗的疗效评价。
背景:在葡萄膜黑色素瘤患者中,由于弥漫性转移扩散,使用实体瘤反应评估标准(RECIST) 1.1标准对肝动脉输注化疗(HAIC)治疗反应的短期评估具有挑战性。由于经常可以观察到肝脏肿大,本研究旨在比较RECIST 1.1和肝容量测定(LV)来评估HAIC治疗反应。患者和方法:对143例接受HAIC治疗的患者(平均年龄65.1±10.9岁,54%为女性)的治疗效果进行评估,采用RECIST 1.1和HAIC前后CT成像的LV。在LV中,评估不同的肝体积增加,以设定区分稳定疾病(SD)和进展疾病(PD)的有效阈值。使用Kaplan-Meier检验计算总生存期(OS)为首次HAIC至患者死亡的时间,并对RECIST 1.1和LV进行多变量分析。结果:在总体人群中,中位OS (mOS)为13.5个月(95% CI 11.2-15.8个月)。在LV中,肝容量增加10%的阈值适合于识别OS显著降低的患者(SD: 103/143例患者,mOS 15.9个月;PD: 40/143例,6.6个月;P < 0.001)。与RECIST 1.1相比,LV是唯一能够识别OS降低的重要预后因素。结论:在伴有肝转移的葡萄膜黑色素瘤患者中,肝容量增加阈值为10%的LV适合用于评估治疗反应,并可作为RECIST 1.1的有价值的附加甚至替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiology and Oncology
Radiology and Oncology ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiology and Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal devoted to the publishing original and high quality scientific papers and review articles, pertinent to diagnostic and interventional radiology, computerized tomography, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, nuclear medicine, radiotherapy, clinical and experimental oncology, radiobiology, medical physics and radiation protection. Therefore, the scope of the journal is to cover beside radiology the diagnostic and therapeutic aspects in oncology, which distinguishes it from other journals in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信