Sriya Sunil, Sarah I Murphy, Ruixi Chen, Wei Chen, Joseph Guinness, Li-Qun Zhang, Renata Ivanek, Martin Wiedmann
{"title":"Application of Mechanistic Models and the Gaussian Process Model to Predict Bacterial Growth on Baby Spinach During Refrigerated Storage.","authors":"Sriya Sunil, Sarah I Murphy, Ruixi Chen, Wei Chen, Joseph Guinness, Li-Qun Zhang, Renata Ivanek, Martin Wiedmann","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Models that predict bacterial growth in food products can help industry with decision-making with regard to microbial food spoilage. Such models have recently been developed using machine learning (ML) rather than a mechanistic understanding of bacterial growth. Thus, our aim was to compare the performance of mechanistic (M) models and the Gaussian process (GP) model (i.e., an ML approach) for predicting bacterial growth on spinach from a US-based supply chain as well as a China-based supply chain; models were developed using previously published data, as well as new data collected in this study from the China-based supply chain. For the packaged spinach collected in this study from the China-based supply chain, the mean net growth of aerobic, mesophilic bacteria over 10 days of shelf life was 1.16 log<sub>10</sub> (n = 11, local distribution) and 1.29 log<sub>10</sub> (n = 8, eCommerce distribution); bacterial growth on spinach did not differ significantly by distribution channel. The data obtained in this study, as well as previously published data on the growth of (i) individual bacterial strains (i.e., strain-level growth) and (ii) the overall bacterial population on baby spinach (i.e., population-level growth), were used to fit models. Specifically, GP models were fit to population-level growth data only, while M models were fit to strain-level and population-level growth data. The RMSE values for the M models (i.e., 0.72, 0.77 and 1.09 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g, for three M models assessed here) and GP models (i.e., 0.68 and 0.81 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g, for the two GP models assessed here) are similar, which suggests that both M and GP models show comparable accuracy at predicting bacterial growth on spinach.</p>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":" ","pages":"100417"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100417","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Models that predict bacterial growth in food products can help industry with decision-making with regard to microbial food spoilage. Such models have recently been developed using machine learning (ML) rather than a mechanistic understanding of bacterial growth. Thus, our aim was to compare the performance of mechanistic (M) models and the Gaussian process (GP) model (i.e., an ML approach) for predicting bacterial growth on spinach from a US-based supply chain as well as a China-based supply chain; models were developed using previously published data, as well as new data collected in this study from the China-based supply chain. For the packaged spinach collected in this study from the China-based supply chain, the mean net growth of aerobic, mesophilic bacteria over 10 days of shelf life was 1.16 log10 (n = 11, local distribution) and 1.29 log10 (n = 8, eCommerce distribution); bacterial growth on spinach did not differ significantly by distribution channel. The data obtained in this study, as well as previously published data on the growth of (i) individual bacterial strains (i.e., strain-level growth) and (ii) the overall bacterial population on baby spinach (i.e., population-level growth), were used to fit models. Specifically, GP models were fit to population-level growth data only, while M models were fit to strain-level and population-level growth data. The RMSE values for the M models (i.e., 0.72, 0.77 and 1.09 log10 CFU/g, for three M models assessed here) and GP models (i.e., 0.68 and 0.81 log10 CFU/g, for the two GP models assessed here) are similar, which suggests that both M and GP models show comparable accuracy at predicting bacterial growth on spinach.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with:
Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain;
Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality;
Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation;
Food fermentations and food-related probiotics;
Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers;
Risk assessments for food-related hazards;
Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods;
Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.