Preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction: does novel proteomics reveal immunological possible candidate biomarkers?

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Marie Winther, Morten Hanefeld Dziegiel, Steffen Ullitz Thorsen
{"title":"Preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction: does novel proteomics reveal immunological possible candidate biomarkers?","authors":"Marie Winther, Morten Hanefeld Dziegiel, Steffen Ullitz Thorsen","doi":"10.1097/MOL.0000000000000965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of the review: </strong>The aim of this review is to explore a possible link between immunological candidate proteins, identified through modern proteomic techniques, and preeclampsia (PE) and fetal growth restriction (FGR).</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Proteomics has become a promising tool in the search for disease pathways, drug targets, and biomarkers. PE and FGR are adverse pregnancy complications with supposed immunological involvement in their pathogenesis, but no circulating immunological biomarkers are currently established for diagnosis and risk stratification. Several proteomic studies have aimed to identify PE and FGR biomarkers - often with varying results across studies. However, proteomics has revealed altered expression of human leukocyte antigen-I in PE cases, which is supported in Genome-wide association study (GWAS) studies. Proteomic results support the heterogeneous nature of PE by identification of molecular subgroups - including subgroups characterized by immune-related proteins e.g. CXCL10. No specific immunological markers are found on FGR, but differences in overall plasma proteomic signature have been suggested.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Proteomics certainly holds great potential. The immunological component in PE and FGR are still unclarified, but improvements in proteomic technologies may provide both definition of disease subgroups and subsequent discovery of biomarkers and targeted analysis within each subgroup.</p>","PeriodicalId":11109,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in lipidology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in lipidology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOL.0000000000000965","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of the review: The aim of this review is to explore a possible link between immunological candidate proteins, identified through modern proteomic techniques, and preeclampsia (PE) and fetal growth restriction (FGR).

Recent findings: Proteomics has become a promising tool in the search for disease pathways, drug targets, and biomarkers. PE and FGR are adverse pregnancy complications with supposed immunological involvement in their pathogenesis, but no circulating immunological biomarkers are currently established for diagnosis and risk stratification. Several proteomic studies have aimed to identify PE and FGR biomarkers - often with varying results across studies. However, proteomics has revealed altered expression of human leukocyte antigen-I in PE cases, which is supported in Genome-wide association study (GWAS) studies. Proteomic results support the heterogeneous nature of PE by identification of molecular subgroups - including subgroups characterized by immune-related proteins e.g. CXCL10. No specific immunological markers are found on FGR, but differences in overall plasma proteomic signature have been suggested.

Summary: Proteomics certainly holds great potential. The immunological component in PE and FGR are still unclarified, but improvements in proteomic technologies may provide both definition of disease subgroups and subsequent discovery of biomarkers and targeted analysis within each subgroup.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current opinion in lipidology
Current opinion in lipidology 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: With its easy-to-digest reviews on important advances in world literature, Current Opinion in Lipidology offers expert evaluation on a wide range of topics from six key disciplines including nutrition and metabolism, genetics and molecular biology, and hyperlipidaemia and cardiovascular disease. Published bimonthly, each issue covers in detail the most pertinent advances in these fields from the previous year. This is supplemented by a section of Bimonthly Updates, which deliver an insight into new developments at the cutting edge of the disciplines covered in the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信