Onset of Type 2 diabetes in adults aged 50 and older in Europe: an intersectional multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Julie Lorraine O'Sullivan, Enrique Alonso-Perez, Francesca Färber, Georg Fuellen, Henrik Rudolf, Jan Paul Heisig, Michaela Kreyenfeld, Paul Gellert
{"title":"Onset of Type 2 diabetes in adults aged 50 and older in Europe: an intersectional multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy.","authors":"Julie Lorraine O'Sullivan, Enrique Alonso-Perez, Francesca Färber, Georg Fuellen, Henrik Rudolf, Jan Paul Heisig, Michaela Kreyenfeld, Paul Gellert","doi":"10.1186/s13098-024-01533-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Disparities in the development of Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) are associated with various social determinants, including sex/gender, migration background, living arrangement, education, and household income. This study applied an intersectional perspective to map social disparities and investigate intersectional effects regarding the onset of T2D among older adults across Europe.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the Survey of Health and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) to conduct an Intersectional Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy (I-MAIHDA) of T2D onset. Individuals aged 50 years or older without known T2D at Wave 4 (2011, baseline) were included and followed through Waves 5 (2013), 6 (2015), 7 (2016), and 8 (2019-2020). Intersectional models were used to estimate additive main effects of sex/gender, migration background, living arrangement, education level, and household income and intersectional interactions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 39,108 individuals were included (age at baseline M = 65.18 years (SD = 9.62), 57.4% women). T2D onset was reported for 9.2% of the sample over the 9-year observation period. In the fully adjusted model, all social determinants showed significant additive associations with T2D onset, while the discriminatory accuracy of the social strata was found to be low (Variance Partition Coefficient = 0.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides a comprehensive mapping of intersectional disparities in onset of T2D among older adults in Europe. The results highlight the risk heterogeneity within the population and show social disadvantages faced by certain groups. However, while the T2D risks were higher in some strata than in others, the intersectional effects were small overall and mostly attributable to the additive main effects. The results suggest that public health strategies to prevent T2D should be universal but tailored to meet the specific situation of the different intersectional strata.</p>","PeriodicalId":11106,"journal":{"name":"Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome","volume":"16 1","pages":"291"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11605936/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-024-01533-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Disparities in the development of Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) are associated with various social determinants, including sex/gender, migration background, living arrangement, education, and household income. This study applied an intersectional perspective to map social disparities and investigate intersectional effects regarding the onset of T2D among older adults across Europe.

Methods: We used data from the Survey of Health and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) to conduct an Intersectional Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy (I-MAIHDA) of T2D onset. Individuals aged 50 years or older without known T2D at Wave 4 (2011, baseline) were included and followed through Waves 5 (2013), 6 (2015), 7 (2016), and 8 (2019-2020). Intersectional models were used to estimate additive main effects of sex/gender, migration background, living arrangement, education level, and household income and intersectional interactions.

Results: A total of 39,108 individuals were included (age at baseline M = 65.18 years (SD = 9.62), 57.4% women). T2D onset was reported for 9.2% of the sample over the 9-year observation period. In the fully adjusted model, all social determinants showed significant additive associations with T2D onset, while the discriminatory accuracy of the social strata was found to be low (Variance Partition Coefficient = 0.3%).

Conclusions: This study provides a comprehensive mapping of intersectional disparities in onset of T2D among older adults in Europe. The results highlight the risk heterogeneity within the population and show social disadvantages faced by certain groups. However, while the T2D risks were higher in some strata than in others, the intersectional effects were small overall and mostly attributable to the additive main effects. The results suggest that public health strategies to prevent T2D should be universal but tailored to meet the specific situation of the different intersectional strata.

欧洲50岁及以上成人2型糖尿病发病:个体异质性和歧视性准确性的交叉多水平分析
背景:2型糖尿病(T2D)发展的差异与各种社会决定因素有关,包括性别/性别、移民背景、生活安排、教育程度和家庭收入。本研究采用交叉视角绘制社会差异图,并调查欧洲老年人T2D发病的交叉效应。方法:我们使用来自欧洲健康和退休调查(SHARE)的数据,对T2D发病的个体异质性和歧视性准确性(I-MAIHDA)进行交叉多水平分析。纳入了在第4期(2011年基线)没有已知T2D的50岁或以上的个体,并随访了第5期(2013年)、第6期(2015年)、第7期(2016年)和第8期(2019-2020年)。交叉模型用于估计性别/性别、迁移背景、居住安排、教育水平和家庭收入的加性主效应和交叉交互作用。结果:共纳入39,108例个体(基线年龄M = 65.18岁(SD = 9.62), 57.4%为女性)。在9年的观察期间,9.2%的样本报告了T2D发病。在完全调整后的模型中,所有社会决定因素都与T2D发病表现出显著的加性关联,而社会阶层的区分准确性较低(方差分割系数= 0.3%)。结论:本研究提供了欧洲老年人T2D发病交叉差异的综合图谱。研究结果强调了人群内部的风险异质性,并显示了某些群体面临的社会劣势。然而,虽然某些地层的T2D风险高于其他地层,但总体上交叉效应较小,主要归因于加性主效应。结果表明,预防T2D的公共卫生策略应具有普遍性,但应根据不同交叉阶层的具体情况进行调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome publishes articles on all aspects of the pathophysiology of diabetes and metabolic syndrome. By publishing original material exploring any area of laboratory, animal or clinical research into diabetes and metabolic syndrome, the journal offers a high-visibility forum for new insights and discussions into the issues of importance to the relevant community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信