Cardiac Amyloidosis Versus Other Restrictive Cardiomyopathies: A Retrospective Analysis of Cardiovascular Outcomes and Arrhythmic Burden.

IF 2.3 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology Pub Date : 2024-11-26 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11795468241302006
Andrew Sagalov, Waqas Ullah, Yevgeniy Brailovsky, Michael Buhnerkempe, Steve Scaife, Abhishek Kulkarni, Mohamed Labedi, Shruti Hegde
{"title":"Cardiac Amyloidosis Versus Other Restrictive Cardiomyopathies: A Retrospective Analysis of Cardiovascular Outcomes and Arrhythmic Burden.","authors":"Andrew Sagalov, Waqas Ullah, Yevgeniy Brailovsky, Michael Buhnerkempe, Steve Scaife, Abhishek Kulkarni, Mohamed Labedi, Shruti Hegde","doi":"10.1177/11795468241302006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The arrhythmic burden and cardiovascular risks of cardiac amyloidosis compared with other types of restrictive cardiomyopathies (RCM), such as hemochromatosis and cardiac sarcoid, have not been well characterized in the literature. An increase in emphasis on screening has resulted in more diagnoses of cardiac amyloidosis and a larger data pool to analyze the cardiovascular outcomes of this cardiomyopathy.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We queried the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database to identify all adult patients diagnosed with cardiac amyloidosis or other RCM between the years 2016 and 2019. Discharge-weighted analysis using survey regressions accounts for discharge weights and characteristics found to be significantly different between groups. A total sample size of 13 345 patients was obtained, including cardiac amyloidosis (N = 8365; 62.7%) and other RCM (N = 4980; 37.3%). Cardiac amyloidosis was associated with a significantly increased risk of stroke (Odds ratio = 3.91: 95% confidence interval = [2.15, 7.11], <i>P</i> < .001) and ventricular tachycardia (1.98 [1.35-2.91], <i>P</i> < .001). Cardiac amyloidosis had a decreased risk of atrial fibrillation (0.56 [0.47-0.68], <i>P</i> < .001). Significant differences in risk were not observed among the different types of heart block and supraventricular arrhythmias. In-hospital mortality was similar between the 2 groups (<i>P</i> = .72).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cardiac amyloidosis was associated with an increased risk of stroke and ventricular tachycardia compared to other types of RCM. Significant differences in in-hospital mortality, bundle branch blocks, and supraventricular arrhythmias were not appreciated. A subgroup analysis comparing light chain (AL) and wild-type transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis outcomes would further delineate the cardiovascular risks of cardiac amyloidosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":10419,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology","volume":"18 ","pages":"11795468241302006"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11603480/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11795468241302006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The arrhythmic burden and cardiovascular risks of cardiac amyloidosis compared with other types of restrictive cardiomyopathies (RCM), such as hemochromatosis and cardiac sarcoid, have not been well characterized in the literature. An increase in emphasis on screening has resulted in more diagnoses of cardiac amyloidosis and a larger data pool to analyze the cardiovascular outcomes of this cardiomyopathy.

Methods and results: We queried the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database to identify all adult patients diagnosed with cardiac amyloidosis or other RCM between the years 2016 and 2019. Discharge-weighted analysis using survey regressions accounts for discharge weights and characteristics found to be significantly different between groups. A total sample size of 13 345 patients was obtained, including cardiac amyloidosis (N = 8365; 62.7%) and other RCM (N = 4980; 37.3%). Cardiac amyloidosis was associated with a significantly increased risk of stroke (Odds ratio = 3.91: 95% confidence interval = [2.15, 7.11], P < .001) and ventricular tachycardia (1.98 [1.35-2.91], P < .001). Cardiac amyloidosis had a decreased risk of atrial fibrillation (0.56 [0.47-0.68], P < .001). Significant differences in risk were not observed among the different types of heart block and supraventricular arrhythmias. In-hospital mortality was similar between the 2 groups (P = .72).

Conclusions: Cardiac amyloidosis was associated with an increased risk of stroke and ventricular tachycardia compared to other types of RCM. Significant differences in in-hospital mortality, bundle branch blocks, and supraventricular arrhythmias were not appreciated. A subgroup analysis comparing light chain (AL) and wild-type transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis outcomes would further delineate the cardiovascular risks of cardiac amyloidosis.

心脏淀粉样变与其他限制性心肌病:心血管结局和心律失常负担的回顾性分析。
背景:与其他类型的限制性心肌病(RCM),如血色素沉着症和心脏肉瘤相比,心脏淀粉样变性的心律失常负担和心血管风险尚未在文献中得到很好的表征。对筛查的重视增加导致更多的心脏淀粉样变诊断和更大的数据池来分析这种心肌病的心血管结果。方法和结果:我们查询了国家住院患者样本(NIS)数据库,以确定2016年至2019年期间诊断为心脏淀粉样变性或其他RCM的所有成年患者。使用调查回归的流量加权分析解释了组间发现的显著差异的流量权重和特征。总样本量为13345例,包括心脏淀粉样变性(N = 8365;62.7%)和其他RCM (N = 4980;37.3%)。心脏淀粉样变性与卒中风险显著增加相关(优势比= 3.91:95%可信区间= [2.15,7.11],P P P P = 0.72)。结论:与其他类型的RCM相比,心脏淀粉样变性与卒中和室性心动过速的风险增加有关。住院死亡率、束支阻滞和室上性心律失常的显著差异未被发现。一项比较轻链(AL)和野生型转甲状腺素(ATTR)淀粉样变结果的亚组分析将进一步描述心脏淀粉样变的心血管风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology
Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
16
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信