Cognitive testing in 19 countries to refine WHO's Sexual Health Assessment of Practices and Experiences.

IF 8.4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Bulletin of the World Health Organization Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-31 DOI:10.2471/BLT.23.291162
Erin C Hunter, Elizabeth Fine, Kirsten Black, Jacqueline Henriks, Fahmida Tofail, Chelsea Morroni, María Makuch, Kathleen Deering, Rocío Murad, Kwasi Torpey, Mamadou Dioulde Balde, Siswanto Agus Wilopo, Filippo Maria Nimbi, Beatrice Maina, Noor Ani Ahmad, Lalla Fatouma Traore, Thae Maung Maung, Adesola Olumide, Farina Abrejo, Dusita Phuengsamran, George William Ddaaki, Nicolás Brunet, Vanessa Brizuela, Lianne Gonsalves
{"title":"Cognitive testing in 19 countries to refine WHO's Sexual Health Assessment of Practices and Experiences.","authors":"Erin C Hunter, Elizabeth Fine, Kirsten Black, Jacqueline Henriks, Fahmida Tofail, Chelsea Morroni, María Makuch, Kathleen Deering, Rocío Murad, Kwasi Torpey, Mamadou Dioulde Balde, Siswanto Agus Wilopo, Filippo Maria Nimbi, Beatrice Maina, Noor Ani Ahmad, Lalla Fatouma Traore, Thae Maung Maung, Adesola Olumide, Farina Abrejo, Dusita Phuengsamran, George William Ddaaki, Nicolás Brunet, Vanessa Brizuela, Lianne Gonsalves","doi":"10.2471/BLT.23.291162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To refine a standard questionnaire on sexual practices, experiences and health-related outcomes to improve its cross-cultural applicability and interpretability. We aimed to explore participants' willingness and ability to answer the draft questionnaire items, and determine whether items were interpreted as intended across diverse geographic and cultural environments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted cognitive interviews (<i>n</i> = 645) in three iterative waves of data collection across 19 countries during March 2022-March 2023, with participants of diverse sex, gender, age and geography. Interviewers used a semi-structured field guide to elicit narratives from participants about their questionnaire item interpretation and response processes. Local study teams completed data analysis frameworks, and we conducted joint analysis meetings between data collection waves to identify question failures.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Overall, we observed that participants were willing to respond to even the most sensitive questionnaire items on sexual biography and practices. We identified issues with the original questionnaire that (i) affected the willingness (acceptability) and ability (knowledge barriers) of participants to respond fully; and/or (ii) prevented participants from interpreting the questions as intended, including poor wording (source question error), cultural portability and very rarely translation error. Our revisions included adjusting item order and wording, adding preambles and implementation guidance, and removing items with limited cultural portability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We have demonstrated that a questionnaire exploring sexual practices, experiences and health-related outcomes can be comprehensible and acceptable by the general population in diverse global contexts, and have highlighted the importance of rigorous processes for the translation and cognitive testing of such a questionnaire.</p>","PeriodicalId":9465,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the World Health Organization","volume":"102 12","pages":"861-872"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11601188/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the World Health Organization","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.23.291162","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To refine a standard questionnaire on sexual practices, experiences and health-related outcomes to improve its cross-cultural applicability and interpretability. We aimed to explore participants' willingness and ability to answer the draft questionnaire items, and determine whether items were interpreted as intended across diverse geographic and cultural environments.

Methods: We conducted cognitive interviews (n = 645) in three iterative waves of data collection across 19 countries during March 2022-March 2023, with participants of diverse sex, gender, age and geography. Interviewers used a semi-structured field guide to elicit narratives from participants about their questionnaire item interpretation and response processes. Local study teams completed data analysis frameworks, and we conducted joint analysis meetings between data collection waves to identify question failures.

Findings: Overall, we observed that participants were willing to respond to even the most sensitive questionnaire items on sexual biography and practices. We identified issues with the original questionnaire that (i) affected the willingness (acceptability) and ability (knowledge barriers) of participants to respond fully; and/or (ii) prevented participants from interpreting the questions as intended, including poor wording (source question error), cultural portability and very rarely translation error. Our revisions included adjusting item order and wording, adding preambles and implementation guidance, and removing items with limited cultural portability.

Conclusion: We have demonstrated that a questionnaire exploring sexual practices, experiences and health-related outcomes can be comprehensible and acceptable by the general population in diverse global contexts, and have highlighted the importance of rigorous processes for the translation and cognitive testing of such a questionnaire.

在19个国家进行认知测试,以完善世卫组织性健康做法和经验评估。
目的:完善一份关于性行为、性经历和健康相关结果的标准问卷,以提高其跨文化适用性和可解释性。我们的目的是探索参与者回答问卷草案项目的意愿和能力,并确定项目是否在不同的地理和文化环境中被解释为有意的。方法:我们于2022年3月至2023年3月在19个国家进行了三次迭代数据收集的认知访谈(n = 645),参与者具有不同的性别、性别、年龄和地理位置。采访者使用半结构化的现场指南来引出参与者关于他们的问卷项目解释和反应过程的叙述。当地研究小组完成数据分析框架,我们在数据收集波之间进行联合分析会议,以识别问题失败。结果:总的来说,我们观察到参与者愿意回答关于性传记和性实践的最敏感的问卷项目。我们确定了原始问卷的问题:(i)影响参与者充分回答的意愿(可接受性)和能力(知识障碍);和/或(ii)阻止参与者按预期解释问题,包括措辞不当(源问题错误)、文化可移植性和极少数翻译错误。我们的修订包括调整项目顺序和措辞,增加序言和实施指导,以及删除文化可移植性有限的项目。结论:我们已经证明,在不同的全球背景下,一份探讨性行为、性经历和与健康有关的结果的调查问卷可以被一般人群理解和接受,并强调了对这种调查问卷的翻译和认知测试进行严格程序的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of the World Health Organization
Bulletin of the World Health Organization 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
0.90%
发文量
317
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Bulletin of the World Health Organization Journal Overview: Leading public health journal Peer-reviewed monthly journal Special focus on developing countries Global scope and authority Top public and environmental health journal Impact factor of 6.818 (2018), according to Web of Science ranking Audience: Essential reading for public health decision-makers and researchers Provides blend of research, well-informed opinion, and news
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信